Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

валечка пишет...❤️

@ai_and_data

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

146subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002181614140
TypeChannel
Username@ai_and_data
DescriptionКино, книги и повседневная жизнь🩷
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/ai_and_data

Growth

1466 August 2026 — 146 subscribers8 August 2026 — 146 subscribers6 August 20268 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 145–147 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 20:46146no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:04146first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 22 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
636.8%
avg views ÷ 146 subscribers
Avg views / post
930
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.15%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held19 (22 April 20262 August 2026)
Views total2,789
Reactions total32
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 20:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
144
Videos
18
Links
45

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

226 reactions across 19 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍10044.2%
5223.0%
🔥5122.6%
😁187.96%
🙏31.33%
🤣20.885%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 226reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 22 April 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 11:30 UTC≈2,420 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Американский социолог Эрик Кляйненберг в своем масштабном исследовании "Жизнь соло" (книгу я уже рекомендовала ранее на канале) доказал,бум одиночества - это не признак упадка общества. Это признак его богатства, безопасности и развития. Впервые в истории человечества нам не нужно сбиваться в пары просто ради того, чтобы физически и экономически выжить. Кроме вышеуказанной книги, есть еще одно крупное исследование б

5👍3🔥2😁1

25 Jul 2026, 14:11 UTC168 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Соавтор исследования, доктор Джо Уиттакер, старший преподаватель криминологии в Университете Суонси, сказал: В последнее время инцелы оказались в центре общественных дискуссий – отчасти благодаря сериалу Netflix «Подростковый возраст», который стал мировым феноменом. Хотя драма может быть полезным инструментом для стимулирования общественных дебатов, важно также иметь под собой прочную научную основу. Наше исследова

👍43🔥1

16 Jul 2026, 12:01 UTC201 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Только сегодня заметила, что в Samsung Notes есть возможность делать простые расчёты: пишешь от руки - и он сразу выдаёт результат. Сложение, вычитание, умножение, логарифмы... Как оказалось, многих это удивляет. Хотя на самом деле подобные вещи существовали давно, просто без распознавания рукописного текста и на гораздо более продвинутом уровне. Например, Mathcad. 🤷🏼‍♀Я почему-то была уверена, что про него все зна

🔥74👍2

11 Jul 2026, 07:16 UTC230 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Сегодня, листая короткие видео, поймала себя на мысли: у зумеров и молодых миллениалов появилась мода ностальгировать по эпохам, в которых они никогда не жили (например, 50-80-е). Винтаж, музыка 80-х, сталинки, антикварная мебель - откуда берется эта фантомная ностальгия? 🤩1. Медиа как источник ложных воспоминаний. Личность во многом формируется в детстве. А что смотрело поколение 90-х и нулевых? Фильмы с эстетикой

👍8🔥54

2 Jul 2026, 12:03 UTC205 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁135👍5

30 Jun 2026, 06:26 UTC≈3,280 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

7 вариантов жизни по Владимиру Дружинину: по сути, вся психология в одной книге. Психолог Владимир Дружинин в книге "Варианты жизни. Очерки экзистенциальной психологии" предлагает простую, но точную типологию того, как мы живем. 🛑Каждый в этом списочке найдет себя и свой сценарий💯👇. 1. Жизнь как предисловие. Откладывание на потом. Ребенок ждет, когда пойдёт в школу, студент, когда начнет работать, взрослый, когда з

6👍4🔥3

19 Jun 2026, 08:15 UTC206 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

В книге Расса Хэрриса "Ловушка счастья", где он разбирает "мифы о счастье + избегание неприятных чувств вместо движения к ценностям" есть интересные приёмы по принятию тревоги, которые не пытаются выключить эмоции, а учат с ними сосуществовать и двигаться к своим целям. 📍удерживая фокус на теле, вернуть внимание к текущему действию - вкус еды, детали рабочего задания, ощущения рук на клавиатуре.🍨 📍когнитивное разде

👍54🔥2

30 May 2026, 14:26 UTC250 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🗡️Кажется, я нашла самый древний кейс по брендингу, который вообще можно себе представить. Археологи с 1960-х вытаскивают из рек и курганов мечи 9-11 веков (раскиданы по всей Европе от Волги до Испании). На них выковано - ULFBERHT. Сталь прекрасная, с низким содержанием шлака и высоким углерода. Везли материалы из Индии. А дальше начинается чистый маркетинг тёмных веков. Видимо, существовала мастерская (где-то в р

👍10

30 May 2026, 09:18 UTC182 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Вход в бухту Золотой Рог. Красота😍 Жара🍹

5👍4🔥4

27 May 2026, 14:05 UTC193 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Купила очень удобный стол с подъемным механизмом. Можно работать стоя.

👍5🔥4

26 May 2026, 13:45 UTC207 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Читаю сейчас книгу по КПТ «Разум рулит настроением». Кому интересна тема когнитивно-поведенческой терапии, книга обязательна к прочтению. Разбираются основные методы КПТ: 📍дневник мыслей для пошагового разбора негативных мыслей (с процентовкой - сбылось или нет) кстати, для позитивных тоже так работает. Со временем, вы обучите свой мозг не видеть мир в чёрно-белых тонах 📍поиск когнитивных искажений. Подробно в св

👍8🔥3

12 May 2026, 10:02 UTC207 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🌸5 основных идей из книги «Быть собой:новая теория сознания» 1. Сознание - это галлюцинация. Мозг строит прогнозы о мире и корректирует их на основе сенсорных данных. Всё, что мы переживаем - цвета, звуки, боль - это лишь интерпретация нервных импульсов, а не прямое отражение реальности. 2. Главная цель мозга - выживание огранизма. Сознание возникло не для познания истины. Поэтому человек, как правило, отстаива

👍9🔥7

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @ai_and_data. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 168,653 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“валечка пишет...❤️” (@ai_and_data), 146 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ai_and_data.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.