Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for AI for teachers

Channel

AI for teachers

@ai4elt

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Citations · Declared links · Cite this entry

102subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002435433399
TypeChannel
Username@ai4elt
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ai4elt

Growth

1001021018 August 2026 — 100 subscribers8 August 2026 — 101 subscribers9 August 2026 — 101 subscribers16 August 2026 — 102 subscribers8 August 202616 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 8 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 100–102 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 16:06102+1
9 Aug 2026, 10:31101no change
8 Aug 2026, 23:31101+1
8 Aug 2026, 04:15100first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 4 May 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

27 reactions across 10 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
933.3%
🔥622.2%
💯518.5%
👏414.8%
👍311.1%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 May 2025 to 23 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
5.00%
1 of 20 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
175
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
194
over 18 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
CQH36pWzJppiHZiqN7xg6DPGiqqyL3yX8hQoo6ND4dQqQX11 November 20251 November 2025

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 May 2025 to 23 November 2025. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

23 Nov 2025, 09:54 UTC275 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

better late than never ⚠️🚉🚀🤙

💯5

Signed Max Oulassevich

23 Nov 2025, 09:53 UTC790 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

https://dzen.ru/video/watch/6922d799937b3048ddfa3330

🔥4

Signed Max Oulassevich

22 Nov 2025, 14:21 UTC259 viewsread 9 August 2026

I was planning to send out a video, but got de-railed : ) Will do so later

Signed Max Oulassevich

22 Nov 2025, 11:29 UTC686 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Example of using Claude.ai when preparing Reading Comprehension Exercises 👀📜📗 The workflow: 👉 Provide Claude with ANY quality text (articles, book excerpts, etc.) 👉 Specify your exercise types and requirements 👉 Get professionally formatted materials with answer keys Example prompt: "Create T/F/NS questions and paragraph matching exercises from this text. Focus on inference and paraphrasing, not simple recall. I

👍2🔥1

Signed Max Oulassevich

22 Nov 2025, 11:25 UTC575 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
File

📚 Transform quality texts into sophisticated comprehension exercises in minutes! Here's what Claude.ai just did for me with a Freakonomics excerpt: ✅ Analyzed a complex text and created 10 inference-based True/False/Not Stated questions ✅ Designed paragraph matching exercises with strategically crafted titles ✅ Used paraphrasing and synonyms throughout (no simple fact-checking) ✅ Generated comprehensive answer keys

2👏1

Signed Max Oulassevich

4 Nov 2025, 11:28 UTC194 viewsread 9 August 2026

https://dzen.ru/video/watch/6909de642317255bf343ede0

Signed Max Oulassevich

4 Nov 2025, 11:27 UTC177 viewsread 9 August 2026

This is a general article, but I also recorded a "how to"video

Signed Max Oulassevich

4 Nov 2025, 11:27 UTC169 viewsread 9 August 2026

I am a big fan these days of detailed lesson reviews and personalised homework. With AI I figured out how I can do that for my students super easily. This is the sort of feedback that I can provide in just a few minutes - a 15 page doc which is specific to everything that a student said during the last lesson!

Signed Max Oulassevich

1 Nov 2025, 15:16 UTCviews —

AI for teachers pinned «Как сэкономить до 70% времени на подготовке уроков и сделать занятия ярче с помощью ИИ? Подготовка к урокам затягивается до ночи, бесконечный поиск материалов, проверки, отчёты... Знакомая ситуация? Теперь есть решение, которое сохранит ваше время и силы.…»

1 Nov 2025, 08:21 UTC175 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Advertisementerid CQH36pWzJppiHZiqN7xg6DPGiqqyL3yX8hQoo6ND4dQqQXForwarded from @relod_official

Как сэкономить до 70% времени на подготовке уроков и сделать занятия ярче с помощью ИИ? Подготовка к урокам затягивается до ночи, бесконечный поиск материалов, проверки, отчёты... Знакомая ситуация? Теперь есть решение, которое сохранит ваше время и силы. Мы создали «Путеводитель по ИИ для учителей иностранных языков» — каталог из 150+ инструментов, которые действительно упрощают вашу работу: ✨ генерация диалогов

1

Signed Max Oulassevich

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ai4elt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

4 May 2025, 06:32 UTCAnonymous Quiz8 voters

What do you think the most common use of AI was in 2025 according to the analysis done by Marc Zao-Sanders for Harvard Business Review? The answer may surprise you...

  1. Enhance learning13%
  2. Infromation search13%
  3. Code generation and checking0%
  4. Content creation63%
  5. Therapy and companionship13%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 May 2025 to 23 November 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 829,794 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“AI for teachers” (@ai4elt), 102 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ai4elt.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.