Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Записки агронома Романа Потапова🌻

@agronote

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

632subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001264065289
TypeChannel
Username@agronote
DescriptionAgronotes
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/agronote

Growth

6327 Aug 2026, 20:07 — 632 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 02:50 — 632 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 20:078 Aug 2026, 02:50
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 631–633 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 02:50632no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:07632first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 15 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
38.3%
avg views ÷ 632 subscribers
Avg views / post
242
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.31%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026
Posts held19 (15 July 20261 August 2026)
Views total4,594
Reactions total83
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 02:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
364
Videos
47
Links
425

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
8m 49s
Average length
2m 12s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

83 reactions across 15 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3238.6%
👏1416.9%
🔥1113.3%
910.8%
😱78.43%
😭56.02%
🤯33.61%
🙈11.20%
🤮11.20%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 83reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 09:29 UTC156 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Это не корпоративный канал Лаборатории и не официальный паблик. Это мой личный блог, поэтому, иногда тут будут посты не связанные напрямую ни с блогом на ютубе, ни с работой лаборатории. Сегодня, как раз такой случай, и я хочу порекомендовать вам фильм "Бугония" 2025 года - это черная комедия, социальная и политическая сатира построенная на конфликте пчеловодов и огромной фарм и пестицидной корпорации (близкая нам те

👍4

30 Jul 2026, 10:39 UTC194 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @npk_ximiaVideo

Ваши CЗР работают не в полную силу? Исправьте это с ВЕГА 90! Наш ПАВ меняет правила игры: ✅ Равномерное покрытие: ни одного «сухого» участка на листе. ✅ Глубокое проникновение: пробивает даже плотный восковой слой. ✅ Экономия: повышает эффективность препаратов на 30–40%. ✅ Стойкость: защита от смывания дождем и быстрого испарения. ВЕГА 90 — это надежная фиксация, мощная защита и уверенный результат в любых погодных

👍52

30 Jul 2026, 10:39 UTC197 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Моя лаборатория работает с 2023 года, за это время было проведено немало испытаний: регуляторы роста, адъюванты, гербициды, протравители, десиканты и т.д. Но были и необычные запросы. Например, с производителем торфа мы испытывали разные смеси торфа, с почвой и агроперлитом и влияние этих смесей на скорость появления всходов. Недавно, тоже был необычный запрос от компании НПК Химия (поставщик пестицидов). Нужно было,

👍2

29 Jul 2026, 15:00 UTC219 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Я стою в поле, среди бесконечных колосьев, полных и спелых. Срываю один и растираю между ладонями. Мелкие ости впиваются в грубую, пыльную кожу мозолистых рук. Ладони раскрываются, я выдыхаю в них жаркий августовский воздух плотный, тягучий. В руках остались золотые зерна - это хлеб. Вот результат большого труда, вот его конец и награда! Беру одно семя, и с трудом разгрызаю пополам - поспело! Жую, это же хлеб! Не вку

👏91

28 Jul 2026, 19:38 UTC210 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026

☝️Ужасная трагедия случилась с нашим коллегой, ученым из Екатеринбурга. Дети катались на квадроциклах по полям Аграрного ВУЗа, а в завершение всей ситуации, приехали взрослые и вместо того, что бы попросить прощение за возможно уничтоженные полевые опыты, убили ученого.

😱7😭5🤯2🤮1

28 Jul 2026, 19:33 UTC211 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://lenta.ru/news/2026/07/28/poyavilos-video-napadeniya-na-izvestnogo-uchenogo-v-ekaterinburge/?utm_medium=social&utm_source=telegram Смерть ученого РАН Зезина после избиения в Екатеринбурге: кадры нападения, подробности

1

23 Jul 2026, 08:47 UTC311 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Своеобразное достижение на замедляемом YouTube - все еще лучшая платформа для видео-контента

👏4

19 Jul 2026, 19:14 UTC314 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Болею сегодня за Аргентину

🔥8

17 Jul 2026, 13:42 UTC288 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @pesticidesunionVideo

🧪Михаил Данилов: устойчивость сорняков, болезней и вредителей требует ускоренного вывода новых СЗР Российским аграриям необходимы новые препараты для борьбы с устойчивыми сорняками, вредителями и болезнями растений, однако их вывод на рынок осложняет длительная и дорогостоящая процедура регистрации. Об этом заявил генеральный директор АО Фирма «Август» Михаил Данилов на «Всероссийском дне поля - 2026» в рамках плена

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @agronote. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 455,362 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Записки агронома Романа Потапова🌻” (@agronote), 632 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/agronote.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.