Channel
@aglaonem
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
429subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002001400484 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @aglaonem |
| Description | Авторский блог про то, как айтишник пытается не убить 100+ растений в квартире 💬 - @stromant 🧘 - https://dzen.ru/aglaonem 📹 - https://youtube.com/@aglaonem 👫 - @aglaonem_bot 🧑🌾 - @vkceo |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/aglaonem |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:18 | 429 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:05 | 429 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 18 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 9 (18 February 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 51 |
| Reactions total | 7 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 05:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
148 reactions across 9 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 56 | 37.8% | |
| custom 5271544607438557048 | 32 | 21.6% | |
| 🔥 | 29 | 19.6% | |
| 😱 | 12 | 8.11% | |
| custom 5276144027786302762 | 9 | 6.08% | |
| custom 5271762396640200492 | 4 | 2.70% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 2.70% | |
| 💩 | 2 | 1.35% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 148reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 18 February 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @aglaonem. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 9 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 February 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Самые красивые растения Каладиумы, получается Хотел купить тот, что на второй фотке на Авито, но некая Эльза забрала последние два экземпляра 😭 Пришлось продавца уговаривать выращивать мне новые и вот спустя 5 месяцев я купил за 400₽ эту красоту. На фотках, кстати выглядел поинтереснее, но посмотрим. Кто разбирается, поделитесь, что зимой с ними делать?
❤4custom 52715446074385570482🔥1
Выращиваю грибы Решил полить Фикус Лирату и получились грибы от перелива, безвредные, но красивые
❤7😱5custom 52715446074385570485💩2
Буду делать бонсай Всегда хотел попробовать вырастить бонсай, но особо не вникал. Знал что делают его из Толстянки и Фикуса Бенджамина, но у меня они и без бонсая благополучно умерли. Но тут наткнулся на канал, где посоветовали для новичков использовать Премну. Заказал, получил, пересадил в диатомит, буду пробовать. Следующий пост про него через год, получается 🥳
🔥6custom 52715446074385570483
Лайфхак для авторского грунта Мне довольно часто приходится пересаживать растения и каждый раз замешивать грунт проблематично: 1) много пыли от перлита, диатомита и тд 2) сложно рассчитать нужное количество 3) лень И я придумал отдельно разрыхлители смешать в 5-литровой бутылке, смешивать с кокосовым субстратом из мешка и просто быстренько в ведерке размешивать нужное количество 🥳 Состав грунта каждый раз разный, …
custom 52715446074385570487❤4🔥4
А теперь как это смотрится в напечатанных на 3D принтере горшках
custom 527154460743855704815❤8custom 52717623966402004924
Пересадил бесплатные эпипремнумы Эпипремнумы разрослись и было решено всех объединить в один балконный ящик. Теперь это красиво 😎 К слову, это одно из самых неприхотливых растений, которые могут растить кустом, а могут виться на несколько метров. Если хотим куст, обрезаем, укореняем и подсаживаем. Эти все мне достались бесплатно: по обмену, при покупке другого растения попросил чикнуть и подарок от подписчиков 🆓 П…
❤13
Я сорвался, но могу объясниться Последний год, я перестал покупать растения, максимум обменивал на то, что давно хотел. Количество растений стало критичным, я не успеваю/лень поливать, следить, вовремя пересаживать и черенковать. Но сегодня я посетил Монстериум, заехал за Антуриумом и по итогу пополнил коллекцию на 6 новых растений. Обосную, что это не дурка ни разу 😬 1) Антуриум Люксурианс 1000₽ - давно хотел, но …
🔥11❤9😁4
Как дешевеют алоказии Полтора года назад у меня была идея на миллион заработать на вариегатных алоказиях. Мне очень понравилась махарани, тогда она стоила в районе 45 тысяч, я думал куплю, размножу и буду продавать за 30 и заработаю миллион. Сейчас уже за 4000 можно купить выращенную с видимой вариегатностью. Для четкой статистики привожу пример прикольного диалога, где списывался с продавцом, ценник был 90 000, сей…
😱7❤4🔥2
Алоказия, которую я хотел продать стала огромной Однажды мой товарищ и гуру алоказий Салих подарил мне клубень Алоказии Коразон. По итогу растение разрослось, и я подумал, а почему бы и не продать, места занимает много, вариегатности нет. Пересадил в стакан прозрачный, договорился с покупателем и в итоге все сорвалось. Прошло несколько месяцев и новые листья стали неприлично больших размеров. Прям кайф. К тому же де…
custom 52761440277863027629❤7🔥5
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @aglaonem. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Пацаны сажают 🪴⛰” (@aglaonem), 429 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aglaonem.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.