Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

I Was Never There Before.

@agigit

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

5subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001775736760
TypeChannel
Username@agigit
Descriptionactive @durov @telegram
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/agigit

Growth

57 August 2026 — 5 subscribers13 August 2026 — 5 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 6 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4–6 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 01:465no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:505first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 28 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
140.0%
avg views ÷ 5 subscribers
Avg views / post
7.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held16 (28 September 20255 August 2026)
Views total7
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 01:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
42
Videos
2
Links
4

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 18:06 UTC7 viewsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @anjingo

@anjingo (250) @agigit (210) @sampaah (155) @kuromio. (qyop) It's totally up for sale, hmu on @xseybot.

27 Apr 2026, 07:02 UTC164 viewsread 13 August 2026

@Fourthu and @Geminia it's currently open rental. Ask me on @xseybot.

14 Oct 2025, 10:33 UTC606 views0 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Setelah dipikir-pikir, kok bisa gua beli @phuwinn ya. Kenapa ga gua tabung aja uang nya. Sepertinya, Impulsive Buying?

4 Oct 2025, 13:49 UTC608 viewsread 13 August 2026

Anjing username gua yang dicolong, dijual 10 ton. 50rb aja ga laku-laku. 🤣

4 Oct 2025, 13:49 UTC567 viewsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @Fragment_Monitor

Mint 🐣 Username: @efirst Price: 10 TON

28 Sept 2025, 16:09 UTC493 viewsread 13 August 2026
Poll

Sell @upond?

  1. Yay.91%
  2. Nay.9%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @agigit. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

28 Sept 2025, 16:09 UTCAnonymous Poll43 voters

Sell @upond?

  1. Yay.91%
  2. Nay.9%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 28 September 2025 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“I Was Never There Before.” (@agigit), 5 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/agigit.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.