Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for AG Frieden dieBasis 🟩🟦🟥🟧🕊

Channel

AG Frieden dieBasis 🟩🟦🟥🟧🕊

@agfriedendiebasis

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

261subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001520767710
TypeChannel
Username@agfriedendiebasis
DescriptionDies ist der Infokanal der Arbeitsgemeinschaft FRIEDEN ( INTERNATIONALES, EUROPA) von dieBasis. Mehr Infos hier: https://diebasis.wiki/wiki/AG_Frieden https://diebasis-partei.de/thema/arbeitsgemeinschaften/ag-frieden/
Created3 August 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/agfriedendiebasis

Growth

2616 Aug 2026, 14:17 — 261 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 01:32 — 261 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 14:177 Aug 2026, 01:32
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 260–262 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 01:32261no change
6 Aug 2026, 14:17261first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 4 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
34.0%
avg views ÷ 261 subscribers
Avg views / post
88.9
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.54%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (4 May 20266 August 2026)
Views total622
Reactions total22
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 01:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,890
Videos
791
Links
4,410

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

52 reactions across 19 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2446.2%
917.3%
🙏815.4%
👌59.62%
🕊35.77%
👎11.92%
👏11.92%
🥰11.92%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 52reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 May 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 17:02 UTC32 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @dieBasisNRWfunktPhoto

💸 Grüne entdecken die Waffenwirtschaft: Wird Aufrüstung zum Geschäftsmodell? 🪖 Ein grünennaher Wirtschaftsverband will die Rüstungsindustrie ausbauen: mit Staatsgarantien, Forschungsprogrammen und Planung über Wahlperioden hinweg. 🤔 Abrüstung spielt im Papier keine Rolle. 🔎 Mit den Stimmen der Grünen wurden 2025 Verteidigungs- und Sicherheitsausgaben oberhalb von 1 Prozent des BIP von der Schuldenbremse ausgenomme

🕊3

1 Aug 2026, 16:13 UTC80 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @dieBasisbewegtPhoto

NIE WIEDER KRIEG – Deutschland darf keinen Spannungsfall ausrufen Offener Brief an den Deutschen Bundestag vom 03.Oktober 2025 vom dieBasis Kreisverband Celle-Uelzen “Deutschland hat zwei Weltkriege erlebt. Die Lehre daraus kann nur heißen: Nie wieder Krieg. Und nie wieder Entscheidungen, die unser Land Schritt für Schritt in eine Kriegslogik treiben. Die aktuelle Diskussion um den Spannungsfall erfüllt uns mit ti

👍5

30 Jul 2026, 18:50 UTC73 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @dieBasisbewegtPhoto

Freundschaftsreise nach Belarus: Erinnerung, Versöhnung und Frieden Im Mai 2026 reisten Johannes Wollbold und Uwe Werner Schierhorn von der Bundesarbeitsgemeinschaft Frieden der Partei dieBasis nach Belarus. Der Reisebericht von Johannes Wollbold führt den Leser nach Brest und an weitere Orte, die bis heute vom Zweiten Weltkrieg geprägt sind. Er schildert Begegnungen mit Vertretern aus Politik, Wissenschaft und Zivi

1

24 Jul 2026, 19:10 UTC115 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @dieBasisNRWfunktPhoto

🔥 Eskalation mit Russland: Spielt die Politik mit dem Feuer? ⚠️ General a. D. Harald Kujat warnt vor Fehleinschätzungen, weiterer Aufrüstung und einem direkten Krieg zwischen NATO und Russland. 🧨 Auch US-Geheimdienste sehen durch die Fortdauer des Ukraine-Krieges ein wachsendes Eskalationsrisiko. ✅ dieBasis NRW teilt die Kritik: Deutschland braucht Neutralität, Diplomatie, Waffenstillstand und eine europäische Fri

🙏5

21 Jul 2026, 13:34 UTC116 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @dieBasisNRWfunktPhoto

💥 Erst Manöver, dann Einsatz? Deutschland braucht Neutralität! ⚠️ Deutschland beteiligt sich nun doch am ersten Manöver der „Koalition der Willigen“. Geübt werden Strukturen für eine mögliche Ukraine-Schutztruppe. 📈 Damit wächst die Gefahr, Schritt für Schritt Kriegspartei zu werden. ✅ dieBasis NRW steht für Neutralität, Frieden und Machtbegrenzung: Neutralität ins Grundgesetz, kein Weg in Einsätze ohne Bundestag,

👍3🙏1

19 Jul 2026, 14:24 UTC109 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @dieBasisNRWfunktPhoto

✋ Kriegslogik stoppen: Frieden braucht klare Köpfe 🕊 Michael Aggelidis bringt es auf den Punkt: NATO-Kritik darf nicht in Kriegssehnsucht kippen. Wer Angriffe auf Europa herbeiredet oder erhofft, landet in derselben Eskalationsfalle. 🚨 Ja, Provokation muss benannt werden. Aber ein großer Krieg wäre kein Sieg, sondern das Ende von Sicherheit. 👉 Zum Beitrag auf unserer Webseite: https://diebasis-nrw.de/2026/07/geist

👌2

19 Jul 2026, 14:23 UTC97 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @dieBasisNRWfunktPhoto

🚨 Wetter als Waffe: Was sagen die alten CIA-Akten? 🌦 TKP berichtet über freigegebene CIA-Dokumente zu Wettermanipulation: Project Stormfury, Project Popeye, Eingriffe in Hurrikans und Regen als Kriegswaffe. 🤔 Wenn Technik Klima und Wetter beeinflusst, geht es um Macht, Umwelt und Bürgerrechte. ✅ dieBasis steht für Freiheit, Machtbegrenzung, Achtsamkeit und offene Kontrolle. Keine geheimen Programme über den Köpfe

👍2

13 Jul 2026, 08:01 UTC130 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @dieBasisNRWfunktPhoto

🚲 FriedensFahrradtour NRW: Friedensfähig statt kriegstüchtig 🕊 Vom 18.–26. Juli rollt die FriedensFahrradtour NRW von Siegen nach Dortmund – über Bonn, Köln, Düsseldorf, Krefeld und Essen. 📌 Thema: Abrüstung, Entspannungspolitik und Nein zur Kriegstüchtigkeit. Auch Bundeswehrwerbung an Schulen steht in der Kritik. 🔗 Alle Infos: https://nrw.dfg-vk.de/friedensfahrradtour-nrw-26-gegen-militarisierung-und-aufruestung

👌2🙏2

7 Jul 2026, 04:14 UTC240 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

BSW, AfD & dieBasis im Demokratiegespräch | Hamburger Bürgerdialog | dieBasis 2026 18.06.2026 Was passiert, wenn drei Parteien, die sonst von allen anderen ausgegrenzt werden, einfach miteinander reden? Genau das haben BSW, AfD und dieBasis an einem Abend in Hamburg ausprobiert. Das Ergebnis war überraschend ehrlich. Manuela Koch (BSW), Lars Hünig (AfD) und Ansgar Stalder (dieBasis) sprechen über die Fragen, die

👍4

4 Jul 2026, 17:32 UTC108 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @FrieBueNORDPhoto

🔹🕊Mit dem Hissen der grün-weißen Flagge mit der Friedenstaube appelliert das weltweite Bündnis der „Mayors for Peace“ („Bürgermeister für den Frieden“) jedes Jahr am 8. Juli an die Staaten der Welt, Atomwaffen abzuschaffen. Rund 500 Städte und Gemeinden nehmen teil, die größte dezentrale Aktion für Frieden und atomare Abrüstung in Deutschland. Das Friedensbündnis Norddeutschland begrüßt die Beteiligung von Städten in

3

3 Jul 2026, 07:34 UTC139 viewsread 7 August 2026

Militärische Übungen mit ziviler Beteiligung mitten in Hamburg (24.-26. September 2026) Red Storm Charlie - Eine Analyse von Peter Scheller als Gastbeitrag veröffentlicht beim Landesverband der Basis Hamburg https://share.google/AXluxhibz8xifozIJ

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @agfriedendiebasis. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 688,812 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“AG Frieden dieBasis 🟩🟦🟥🟧🕊” (@agfriedendiebasis), 261 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/agfriedendiebasis.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.