Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 25 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
6 measurements spanning 55 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 139–148 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
30 Sept 2026, 18:41
140
-3
11 Sept 2026, 07:39
143
-1
2 Sept 2026, 05:05
144
-1
13 Aug 2026, 15:58
145
-2
8 Aug 2026, 20:46
147
no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:43
147
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 3 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
4 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
4
100.0%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 April 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
근데 솔직히 시장 참여하면서 느낀점은 소위 트레이딩이라고 일컬어지는 영역에서의 개인 엣지가 점점 없어질거 같은건 사실입니다
채널에서 종종 생각을 이야기 하긴 했었는데 수능치러 가기전에 간단하게 생각 정리해서 말씀드려볼게요 (그냥 제 생각입니다 공신력xxx)
우선 첫번쨰로 ,대부분의 사람들이 빠져있는 기술적분석 기본적분석 같은 일반 팩터를 가지고 개인이 돌리는것은 하위유사퀀트의 일종으로써 메인 전략으로서 사용하기엔 무리가 있다고 생각합니다. 데이터가 전부인 영역에선 데이터의 퀄리티 컴퓨팅 용량등등 사실상 알파고랑 싸우는거랑 비슷하다고 생각합니다.부수적인 요소로 약간의 엣지를 더해주는 정도로써만 활용이 가능하다고 생각되네요. 여담으로 (정확하진 않지만 기술적분석이 있는 매매와 아예 랜덤한 매매를 비교했을때 30프로 정도의 엣지가 더 있었다고…
결국에 ai자체로 수익이 나야한다고 생각하는 입장에서 지금 사이클에 약간 회의적이긴 합니다 https://www.valley.town/space/@timocy/articles/6a686e56b0c7a016fd2d8cfb?shareToken=iQQlD_mErgaYvjLYK9AVEYBCRSguR6aFXG3LnwuTTLg 한번 참고해서 읽어보시면 좋을거 같고
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @age2006investor. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“재수생금융인의 매매일지” (@age2006investor), 140 subscribers as measured 30 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/age2006investor.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.