Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

سید مهدی ابوالقاسمی

@agartonabashi

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

527subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001076070783
TypeChannel
Username@agartonabashi
CreatedBetween 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/agartonabashi

Growth

526527526.56 Aug 2026, 14:53 — 526 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 18:31 — 526 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 12:21 — 527 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 14:537 Aug 2026, 12:21
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 526–527 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 12:21527+1
6 Aug 2026, 18:31526no change
6 Aug 2026, 14:53526first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
37.9%
avg views ÷ 527 subscribers
Avg views / post
200
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.00%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (1 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total2,798
Reactions total84
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 18:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

125 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
10180.8%
🔥108.00%
👏54.00%
👍32.40%
💔32.40%
😢21.60%
😍10.8%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 125reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC47 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

ابری تو! اما صبح می‌فهمند باریدی من می‌شناسم گریه‌های بی‌صدایت را #سید_مهدی_ابوالقاسمی @agartonabashi

4

6 Aug 2026, 00:18 UTC60 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

غم تو هست که شادم من، بیا همیشه بیازارم نگو چه شد که سپردم دل، که از بلاش نگه دارم مرا از آن همه زیبایی، غنیمتی‌ست که چشمم را شبی مقابل لبخندت به جای آینه بگذارم نپرس حال مرا از من، به موی خویش ببر دستی به یک حساب سرانگشتی، ببین چه‌قدر گرفتارم بیا به خوابم و ناگاهان، مرا بگیر در آغوشت مگر رها شوم از کابوس، در این خیال که بیدارم چه شد؟ کجام؟ چه می‌بینم؟ نشسته‌ای سر بالینم چرا؟ چرا دلم آشوب است؟ چرا تو هستی و تب د

3

4 Aug 2026, 20:48 UTC83 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

اگر هزار گزند آید از تو بر دل ریش بد از من است که گویم نکو نمی‌آید #سعدی @agartonabashi

3

1 Aug 2026, 20:24 UTC147 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
File

شیوه‌ای که داری تو، شیوه نیست! بیماری‌ست #حسین_منزوی #سید_مهدی_ابوالقاسمی @agartonabashi

3

30 Jul 2026, 18:08 UTC174 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

مرا همین‌که به راه تو چشم دوخته‌ام بس در انتظارم و هیچ از تو انتظار ندارم #سید_مهدی_ابوالقاسمی @agartonabashi

3👍1

26 Jul 2026, 22:26 UTC244 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026

بگو که جان و جهانی برایتان بفرستم برای خانه چه می‌خواهی از همان بفرستم از آسمان بلندت اگر که خسته شدی باز به بی‌پناهی شب‌هات آشیان بفرستم اگر که مُردم و‌ دیگر کسی نبرد دلت را به من بگو که دلم را از آن جهان بفرستم کسی اگر که ندانسته است قدر دلت را بگو که مثل دل تو دلی جوان بفرستم چه می‌‌شود که دمی پای صحبتم بنشینی نخواه نامه‌ای از دست این و آن بفرستم اگر ستاره کم آورده‌ای برای شمردن به جای سقف اتاق تو آسمان بفرست

5😍1

26 Jul 2026, 20:41 UTC201 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Voice message

#سعدی #سید_مهدی_ابوالقاسمی @agartonabashi

5

25 Jul 2026, 22:20 UTC205 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @ravaaaq

از دور تماشای تو کردن بِهْ از آن است کآییم به نزدیک و به حسرت بگدازیم #مسیح_کاشانی @ravaaaq

🔥52

25 Jul 2026, 20:10 UTC226 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026

‏تا نیمه‌راه همسفری داشتیم، رفت با اینکه هر دو چشم تری داشتیم، رفت پابند ما نبود و دل از ما گرفت و برد ما نیز هم دلی سفری داشتیم، رفت ما را به هر ستاره‌ی بختی امید نیست در هفت آسمان قمری داشتیم، رفت هر شب خیال بالش امنی‌ست در سرم در آرزوی دوست سری داشتیم، رفت ‏باران شدم که راه نیفتد ولی نشد تنها امید مختصری داشتیم، رفت ما را تو با گرفتن جان امتحان نکن! از جان خود عزیزتری داشتیم، رفت... ‎ #سید_مهدی_ابوالقاسمی @

11👍1

22 Jul 2026, 23:09 UTC333 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

تصویر خواب‌هام سیاه است بعد او خوابی برای دیدن اگر بود، خوب بود این دل که گاه می‌زند آتش به هستی‌ام کارش فقط تپیدن اگر بود، خوب بود #سید_مهدی_ابوالقاسمی @agartonabashi

7

18 Jul 2026, 21:58 UTC327 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026

#غزل_تازه: تنها فقط برای تو تعریف می‌کنم اینکه چرا به پای تو...؟ تعریف می‌کنم ای صبح بعد یک شبِ باران! فقط... فقط با عشق از هوای تو تعریف می‌کنم هر جا که نیست گاه حواس تو، با من است از من بخواه! جای تو تعریف می‌کنم این قصه از دهان تو تنها شنیدنی‌ست با شوق از صدای تو تعریف می‌کنم با گونه‌های نم‌زده‌ در غربتم مدام از دست آشنای تو تعریف می‌کنم این از حسادت است که در جمع ساکتم از تو فقط برای تو تعریف می‌کنم #س

13💔3🔥2👏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @agartonabashi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 227,313 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“سید مهدی ابوالقاسمی” (@agartonabashi), 527 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/agartonabashi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.