Ой ой ой ой спасибо большое Ждите новостей как уже приеду во владос
🙏3custom 54494040650688897952custom 52558302068657564931custom 54521534282538986451

Channel
@agangofhoodedcrow
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
199subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002015507601 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @agangofhoodedcrow |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/agangofhoodedcrow |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:19 | 199 | no change |
| 14 Aug 2026, 03:18 | 199 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 5 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (5 June 2026 – 14 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,111 |
| Reactions total | 338 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 03:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
758 reactions across 18 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5449404065068889795 | 188 | 24.8% | |
| ❤🔥 | 156 | 20.6% | |
| 🙏 | 76 | 10.0% | |
| custom 5451997877423335350 | 63 | 8.31% | |
| custom 5438398340221926523 | 47 | 6.20% | |
| custom 5452153428253898645 | 47 | 6.20% | |
| ❤ | 43 | 5.67% | |
| 🥰 | 34 | 4.49% | |
| 💔 | 31 | 4.09% | |
| custom 5255830206865756493 | 21 | 2.77% | |
| 💯 | 14 | 1.85% | |
| custom 5307706518378936982 | 11 | 1.45% | |
| 💅 | 10 | 1.32% | |
| 🔥 | 9 | 1.19% | |
| custom 5427198096306100235 | 3 | 0.396% | |
| 🕊 | 3 | 0.396% | |
| custom 5238024560946717149 | 2 | 0.264% |
Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 758reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 5 June 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @agangofhoodedcrow. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 June 2026 to 14 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Ой ой ой ой спасибо большое Ждите новостей как уже приеду во владос
🙏3custom 54494040650688897952custom 52558302068657564931custom 54521534282538986451
Отписались лохи, но и насрать, держим кулачки за попуга. Я не могу не щитпостить
🙏17💔11💯3
Я записалась на завтра, косарь приём, ещё на дорогу наскребать надо Главное не ахуеть от дальнейших цен
🙏17
Я КАПЕЦ КАК НАДЕЮСЬ, ЧТО ВСЁ БУДЕТ НЕ ТАК ПЛОХО, но я в ахуе ибо ну ну всё соблюдаешь, всё делаешь, всё заебись, а тут прикол ебучий не хочу чтоб доходило до каких то операций и т.п но да, я знала, что у волнистиков часто к сожалению ген.заболевания я не хочу гадать, я вижу, что с птицей че то не то, какая то хуйня появилась, значит всё надо к вет орнитологу
🙏16💔5
блять извините за вот это вот всё, но у одного из волнушек опухоль образовалась, возможно это липома?? Типа доброкачественная, но все равно обязательно нужно на осмотр вести, а лечить птиц это такой финансовый трэш. Резко апатичная стала, вроде ест, но все равно ослабела так резко, я щас волосы рвать на себе начну...............(даже если я ошиблась ЭТО ВАЩЕ НЕ НОРМ хуйня с ней, бедная Глаша) а в городе нет вет орнит…
💔15🙏8🕊3❤1
я не знала, что есть международный день левшей, чзх ну лан с моим днём 🚬
🥰16custom 54494040650688897957custom 52558302068657564934
випка, но хз когда порисунькаю ещё, чет не хочу пока но зафиксировать идею надо было
❤23custom 544940406506888979511custom 545215342825389864511custom 52558302068657564932❤🔥1
быстро скетч Твайлайт г6 перед работой. К новому поколению отношусь очень скептично, но пикчи понравились. Буду ждать Рарити с Эппл 📖 #скетч@agangofhoodedcrow #млп@agangofhoodedcrow
custom 545199787742333535033❤🔥16custom 544940406506888979514custom 54521534282538986456❤4custom 52558302068657564933custom 53077065183789369822custom 54383983402219265232
Чёт я долго растягивала эту пикчу и быть может добавила бы, что нибудь, но решила оставить сейчас как есть. Выглядит как открытка лол 📷 Хоть я и расстроена, что пока не знаю какой можно было бы добавить текст, я очень хочу наконец то уже запостить этот арт, так что....... Да, ставим классы, колокольчики, подписки, комментариусы ага 😪 Я буду рада активу и поддержки ибо хоть я и взяла "отпуск" на лето, всё равно пока…
❤🔥37custom 544940406506888979520custom 545215342825389864517custom 52558302068657564933custom 54383983402219265233
сначала уебала, потом пожалела
custom 544940406506888979528custom 545199787742333535011custom 54521534282538986459🥰4custom 52558302068657564932❤🔥1custom 54383983402219265231
я думаю из метлы её любимый перс был бы Мёрдерфейс отвечаю
💯11custom 54494040650688897954custom 54521534282538986453💅2
Скетч с Агнес 🍾 #скетч@agangofhoodedcrow #ос@agangofhoodedcrow
custom 543839834022192652326❤🔥15custom 544940406506888979510custom 54519978774233353503
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @agangofhoodedcrow. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 565,250 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“AGOHC🪶 16/18+” (@agangofhoodedcrow), 199 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/agangofhoodedcrow.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.