Channel
@agamicmauj
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
191subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002367944418 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @agamicmauj |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/agamicmauj |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 16:06 | 191 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:31 | 190 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 00:00 | 190 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 3 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
195 reactions across 19 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 130 | 66.7% | |
| 🔥 | 23 | 11.8% | |
| 🙏 | 15 | 7.69% | |
| 🥰 | 12 | 6.15% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 3.59% | |
| 🫡 | 4 | 2.05% | |
| 👌 | 3 | 1.54% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.513% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 195reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 3 March 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
"यद्भाष्यामृतपानेन जरामरणवर्जितम्। पदं याता हि विबुधाः शङ्करं नौमि तं गुरुम्॥" जिनके भाष्यरूपी अमृत से विवेकीजन जन्म-मरण से रहित मोक्षपद को प्राप्त करते हैं, ऐसे गुरु श्री शंकराचार्य को मैं प्रणाम करता हूँ। I bow to Guru Sri Shankara, by drinking the nectar of whose commentaries, the wise attain the state beyond birth and death. न मे जानमाद्यं, न मे योगमेदं, न मे ध्यानमंत्रं, न वाऽऽपि स्थिरं च। विजानामि नान्यं, शरणं…
❤9🥰7🔥5
Photo, posted without a caption
❤12👍7🥰5🔥3
Bhagvat Puran - 3.29.21 to 3.29.27
❤6
Hindus don’t know their own history. In 1757, when Abdali’s army came to plunder Gokul, 4000 naked, ash-smeared Naga Sadhus (Dasnami Sampradaya ) stood firm. Half were martyred, but they killed equal number of Afghans and saved Gokul. Meanwhile,fake protectors were missing from Attack to Delhi.
❤8
The Manubhashya of Medhatithi (Manusmriti 2.22)
🔥5❤3
Photo, posted without a caption
❤8
Photo, posted without a caption
❤11
"Those born in Manu's race are shielded by their own heroic nature" -Kālidāsa
❤14
https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-history-of-debates-between-the-Dvaita-and-Visishtadvaita-schools-of-Vedanta/answer/C%C4%81rv%C4%81ka-2?ch=10&oid=1477743909692209&share=1f617f75&srid=u98zx6&target_type=answer
❤2
यदि कोई हिंदू अपनी गाय बेचना चाहता है, तो वे इसे हमारी वेबसाइट GO-LX पर हमारे आश्रम को बेचें। 🌻🙏 ~ 🚩 ज्योतिर्मठ शङ्कराचार्य स्वामी श्री अविमुक्तेश्वरानंद सरस्वती जी 🙏
🙏8❤3🔥1🫡1
जासु अंस उपजहिं गुनखानी । अगनित लच्छि उमा ब्रह्मानी ॥ भृकुटि बिलास जासु जग होई । राम बाम दिसि सीता सोई ॥2॥ भावार्थ:- जिनके अंश से गुणों की खान अगणित लक्ष्मी, पार्वती और ब्रह्माणी (त्रिदेवों की शक्तियाँ) उत्पन्न होती हैं तथा जिनकी भौंह के इशारे से ही जगत् की रचना हो जाती है, वही (भगवान की स्वरूपा-शक्ति) सीता राम की बाईं ओर स्थित हैं ॥2॥ ~ रामचरितमानस 1.147.2
❤14
कल एक नास्तिक aaru rational की धुलाई हुई जो पहले देवी देवता आचार्यों को उल्टा सीधा बोलता था इसको पनाह पहले थोर देता था जब इसकी धुलाई की तो ये भाग गया आज कल किसी नास्तिक ग्रुप में उठ बैठ रहा हैं कल किसी उसके ही मित्र के ग्रुप में अद्वैत को उल्टा सीधा बोल रहा था जब इसे ललकारा गया तो कहने लगा मैं नहीं करूँगा debate भागने लगा बहुत समझाने के बाद मान गया फिर क्या था हमारे आगमिक मौज के टीम के सदस्य mr. जय न्याययिक ने उनकी अ…
🔥9
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @agamicmauj. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 129,676 of 1,624,904entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“आगमिक मौज” (@agamicmauj), 191 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/agamicmauj.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.