Channel
@Kapila_Samkhya
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
184subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002385918733 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Kapila_Samkhya |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Kapila_Samkhya |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Aug 2026, 10:13 | 184 | +2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 05:55 | 182 | -3 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:33 | 185 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 23:46 | 185 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 27 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
117 reactions across 17 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 41 | 35.0% | |
| 🔥 | 34 | 29.1% | |
| 😁 | 13 | 11.1% | |
| 💯 | 12 | 10.3% | |
| 🕊 | 6 | 5.13% | |
| ⚡ | 5 | 4.27% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 4.27% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 0.855% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 117reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 October 2025 to 2 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
" यथा दुःखात् क्लेशः पुरुषस्य न तदा सुखाभिलाषः।" ~ किसी भी प्राणी में दुःख के प्रति यादृश द्वेषपूर्णता, सुख की अभिलाषा से बलवती देखी जाती है । प्राणीमात्र में दुःखनिवृत्ति की जितनी इच्छा है, उतनी सुखप्राप्ति की नहीं । ~ सांख्यसूत्रकार परमर्षि Join us at 👇⬇️ @Kapila_Samkhya
❤7
Three historical phases of Sāṃkhya philosophy: 1. Classical Phase – Traditionally traced to Kapila, early Sāṃkhya was one of the most influential metaphysical systems in India. Its dualism of Puruṣa and Prakṛti shaped major traditions and strongly influenced texts like the Mahabharata and early Yoga thought. 2. Early Medieval Phase – During the classical period, especially around Ishvarakrishna and the Sāṃkhyakārik…
😁5
Video, posted without a caption
1000 scientist who sacrificed their 20s and 30s in research VS avg 20y/o jaahil niggers, who reject their research with no proper knowledge about that field
🕊5
💀💀💀 Follow :- @Kapila_Samkhya
🤫🤫
🔥8
A pdf written as skepticism on a particular section of Philosophy.
👍5
File, posted without a caption
🔥7
May Sounds funny, but is a harsh reality of today's era.😞 Follow us at :- @Kapila_Samkhya
💯10😁1
Modern Sāṃkhyavādin pinned «अथ सांख्ययोगविहित पुरुषतत्त्व दृष्टव्य निरुपणं :- कल कुछ लेख दृष्टिगोचर हुए जिसमें सांख्योक्त पुरुष के दृष्टा होने का "तथाकथित" खंडन है। संभव है, लेखक ने "अहम् सर्वज्ञः" के मतिभ्रम से ऐसा मान लिया हो! आज उनके दिए विविध हेतुओं की समीक्षा करते हैं । १. द…»
वैसे तो दृष्टान्तों से पूर्वपक्ष का निराकरण हो चुका है परन्तु गूढ़विचार से इन दृष्टान्तों में ज्ञान-ज्ञेय-ज्ञाता सन्दर्भ में अव्याप्ति है, ऐसा प्रतीत होता है। यही कारण था कि हमने आपको चित्छायापत्तिसिद्धांत का भलीभांति अध्ययन की सलाह दी थी। ज्ञातृप्रकाश्यवृत्ति अग्याबुद्धि के पुरुषाकारा होने से "मम्" वृत्ति में अनुव्यवसाय से बोध्य-बोध का निरूपण तथा स्वयंबोध न होने से ज्ञातास्वरुप ज्ञान और विषयभूत ज्ञान के पृथकत्व से हो…
🔥6
अथ सांख्ययोगविहित पुरुषतत्त्व दृष्टव्य निरुपणं :- कल कुछ लेख दृष्टिगोचर हुए जिसमें सांख्योक्त पुरुष के दृष्टा होने का "तथाकथित" खंडन है। संभव है, लेखक ने "अहम् सर्वज्ञः" के मतिभ्रम से ऐसा मान लिया हो! आज उनके दिए विविध हेतुओं की समीक्षा करते हैं । १. दृष्टत्व/साक्षित्व से पुरुष विकारशील होता है, क्योंकि ये क्रियाएं हैं। यदि उदासीन साक्षी भी माने तो साक्षित्व रहता है। - नहीं, यह प्रश्न तब उठता जब पुरुष की दृश्यलब्ध…
🔥6
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Kapila_Samkhya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 369,404 of 1,624,904entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Modern Sāṃkhyavādin” (@Kapila_Samkhya), 184 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Kapila_Samkhya.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.