همینجوری یهویی و بی ربط خواستم پشت صحنه بذارم براتون
🤣5🥰4

Channel
@aftercut_byIan
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
554subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003979510898 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @aftercut_byIan |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 1 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/aftercut_byIan |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 23:17 | 554 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:17 | 558 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:50 | 558 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:53 | 559 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 1 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (1 July 2026 – 27 July 2026) |
| Views total | 3,516 |
| Reactions total | 127 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 18:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
252 reactions across 14 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 136 | 54.0% | |
| 👏 | 40 | 15.9% | |
| 👍 | 26 | 10.3% | |
| 🔥 | 17 | 6.75% | |
| 😭 | 17 | 6.75% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 2.38% | |
| 🤣 | 5 | 1.98% | |
| 💔 | 3 | 1.19% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 0.397% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 0.397% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 252reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
همینجوری یهویی و بی ربط خواستم پشت صحنه بذارم براتون
🤣5🥰4
Aftercut pinned «مکث پنجم: The untamed رام نشده تاریخ یک سوءتفاهم»
این بچهها بهتر تصمیم نگرفتن چون از اول مهربونتر یا عاقلتر بودن. تعصب رو کامل تحویل گرفته بودن؛ جینلینگ هم موقع عصبانیت معمولا اول شمشیر میکشید و بعد بررسی میکرد موضوع چی بوده.فرقش این بود که هنوز برای دفاع از اون تعصب، چیزی نساخته بودن. اگه جینلینگ قبول میکرد بزرگترها همهی حقیقت رو نگفتن، تهش غرورش زخمی میشد، چند روز میرفت تو غارش اخم میکرد و مجبور میشد بعضی از نفرتهای قدیمیش رو از نو بررسی کنه. ولی …
❤12👍2👏1💔1
چرا نسل دوم همون اشتباههای نسل اول رو تکرار نکرد؟ اگه زیاد با هم زندگیکردن و از مرگ و زندگی رد شدن باعث میشد آدمها همدیگه رو بهتر بفهمن، نسل اول رامنشده باید تا آخر داستان استاد ارتباط سالم میشد. اینها با هم درس خونده بودن، جنگیده بودن، جون همدیگه رو نجات داده بودن، عزیز از دست داده بودن و تقریبا از هر حادثهای که میشد با شمشیر و خون و موسیقی غمگین ازش عبور کرد، عبور کرده بودن. با این حال، همین که پای یه س…
👏7❤3👍1
بعد از مرگ وی ووشیان، لان وانگجی شونزده سال وقت داشت به این فکر کنه که شناختن یه نفر کافی نیست؛ باید جوری کنارش وایسی که خودش هم این ایستادن رو ببینه. وقتی وی ووشیان برمیگرده، لان وانگجی دیگه تبدیل به کسی نمیشه که هرکاری کرد بگه «اسلی کینگ، ادامه بده». احتمالا بچه هنوز هم هربار میشنید «لان جان، یه راهی به ذهنم رسیده» به فروپاشی روحی روانی می رسید. فرقش این بود که دیگه میدونست وی ووشیان ممکنه قانون رو بشکنه، و…
❤18👍1💔1
صحنهی فانوسها خیلی زود نشون میده لان وانگجی چی توی وی ووشیان دیده. وی ووشیان آرزو کرد تمام عمر طرف آدمهای ضعیفتر وایسه و کاری نکنه که جلوی وجدان خودش شرمنده باشه. یعنی وسط چند هزار قانون گوسو، کل اخلاق رو توی یه جمله جمع میکنه. لان وانگجی هم همونجا نمیگه «بسیار خب، از امروز هر فاجعهای به بار آوردی مورد تایید خاندان لانه.» فقط میفهمه این آدم برای سرگرمی نظم جهان رو به هم نمیریزه. ممکنه قبل از اجرای نقشهه…
❤13💔1
چرا لان وانگجی با همه سرد بود، ولی خرابکاریهای وی ووشیان رو تحمل میکرد؟ اول باید یه چیزی رو روشن کنیم: لان وانگجی با همه سرد نبود، فقط رابط کاربریش خیلی مینیمال طراحی شده بود. این بچه مهربون بود، از ضعیفترها دفاع میکرد و هرجا آشوبی پیش میاومد سروکلهش پیدا میشد، ولی برای نشوندادن هر احساس سادهای انگار اول باید درخواست کتبی ثبت میکرد، سه نفر از بزرگان خاندان تأییدش میکردن و بعد نهایتا یه میلیمتر گوشهی ل…
❤20
شاید برای همینه که فندوم سالهاست دست از سر این رابطه برنمیداره و توی فنفیکها هی وی ووشیان رو برمیگردونه اسکلهی نیلوفر، جیانگ چنگ رو مینشونه روبهروش و امیدوار میشه این بار قبل از اینکه یکی توهین کنه و اون یکی ناپدید بشه، پنج دقیقه مثل آدم حرف بزنن. البته حتی سر همین آشتی خیالی هم دعواست. یه عده میخوان وی ووشیان برگرده، همهچیز رو توضیح بده، عذرخواهی کنه، جیانگ چنگ رو بغل کنه و مسئولیت کامل خدمات پس از فروش …
❤16👍2
چرا جیانگ چنگ رو با تمام وجود دوست داری ولی دلت میخواد براش یه جلسه تراپی اجباری رزرو کنی؟ جیانگ چنگ از اون شخصیتهاست که دو دقیقه اول دلت براش میسوزه، دقیقه سوم یه چیزی میگه که با خودت فکر میکنی خب عزیزم، حالا لازم نبود تمام تروماهاتو با همه اطرافیانت شیر کنی. اصلا بحثش که میاد وسط، فندوم سریع دو دسته میشه. یه عده میگن اون همهچی رو از دست داد، مجبور شد یه خاندان نابودشده رو از صفر جمع کنه، جینلینگ رو بزرگ …
❤19
وقتی سیاهی لشکر، کارگردان از آب درمیاد نیه هوایسانگ از اون شخصیتاییه که دفعهی اول جدیاش نمیگیری (دفعه ده هزارم هم همینطور)، چون خودش هم انگار خیلی اصراری نداره جدی گرفته شه. قیافهاش همیشه شبیه کسیه که وسط یه جلسه مهم نشسته ولی فقط منتظره ببینه ناهار چی میدن. یعنی آدمیه که اگه ریاست فرقه رو بهش نمیدادن، نهایتا میرفت یه مغازهی لوازم فانتزی میزد و به مردم بادبزن ست حال روحیشون رو میفروخت. کل سکانس هاشم خلاصه…
👏20❤4👍1
مکث پنجم: The untamed رام نشده تاریخ یک سوءتفاهم
🔥16😭1
Video, posted without a caption
😭16🥰2
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @aftercut_byIan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 647,514 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Aftercut” (@aftercut_byIan), 554 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aftercut_byIan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.