Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

اپستین

@afshgary

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

382subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001084628555
TypeChannel
Username@afshgary
CreatedBetween 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/afshgary

Growth

3827 Aug 2026, 03:17 — 382 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 18:57 — 382 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 03:177 Aug 2026, 18:57
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 381–383 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 18:57382no change
7 Aug 2026, 03:17382first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.4%
avg views ÷ 382 subscribers
Avg views / post
43.5
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.96%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (6 August 20266 August 2026)
Views total871
Reactions total6
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 03:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

6 reactions across 4 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
233.3%
👏233.3%
👌116.7%
👍116.7%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 21:57 UTC9 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

🖤 #دعای_فرج بسم الله الرحمن الرحیم إِلَهِي عَظُمَ الْبَلاءُ وَ بَرِحَ الْخَفَاءُ وَ انْكَشَفَ الْغِطَاءُ وَ انْقَطَعَ الرَّجَاءُ وَ ضَاقَتِ الْأَرْضُ وَ مُنِعَتِ السَّمَاءُ وَ أَنْتَ الْمُسْتَعَانُ وَ إِلَيْكَ الْمُشْتَكَى وَ عَلَيْكَ الْمُعَوَّلُ فِي الشِّدَّةِ وَ الرَّخَاءِ اللَّهُمَّ صَلِّ عَلَى مُحَمَّدٍ وَ آلِ مُحَمَّدٍ أُولِي الْأَمْرِ الَّذِينَ فَرَضْتَ عَلَيْنَا طَاعَتَهُمْ وَ عَرَّفْتَنَا بِذَلِكَ مَنْزِلَت

6 Aug 2026, 21:30 UTC24 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

┃جفری ادوارد اپستین ┃یک پرونده ناتمام -🎙️آرمان حافظی #ناگفته_ها #جفری_اپستین ‌

6 Aug 2026, 21:25 UTC26 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

⭕️ افشاگری بیل گیتس درباره اپستین 🔴 بیل گیتس مدعی شد جفری اپستین پس از قطع همکاری‌ها تلاش کرده بود با استفاده از اطلاعات شخصی او، ارتباط میانشان را دوباره برقرار کند. #مایکروسافت #جفری_اپستین

6 Aug 2026, 21:24 UTC24 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

ویتنی وب، روزنامه‌نگار تحقیقی می‌گوید جفری اپستین با اطلاعات نظامی اسرائیل و نه فقط موساد، پیوندهای قوی داشت. او به ارتباط او با ایهود باراک، که اطلاعات نظامی را در دهه 1980 رهبری می کرد، اشاره می کند و پیشنهاد می کند که اپستین از طریق رابرت ماکسول به خدمت گرفته شده است. وب به منابعی مانند آری بن مناشه اشاره می‌کند و یادآور می‌شود که بازدید اپستین از پایگاه‌های نظامی اسرائیل در سال 2007 برای یک سرمایه‌دار ثروتمند غیر

6 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC58 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

♨️طرفدار استرالیایی، آمریکا را سنگین مسخره کرد. 🔹شما نتونستید ویتنام رو شکست بدید شما نتونستید ایران رو شکست بدید جفری اپستین یکی از خودتون بود👌👌 #اپستین

👏2

6 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC51 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

♨️تحلیلگر سیاسی آمریکایی: اپستین با بالاترین سطوح دستگاه امنیت ملی آمریکا ارتباط داشت. #اپستین

6 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC53 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

♨️انتشار یادداشت منتسب به خودکشی جفری اپستین 🔹بر اساس اسناد منتشرشده، این یادداشت مربوط به ژوئیه ۲۰۱۹ و پیش از نخستین حادثه‌ای است که اپستین در سلول خود بی‌هوش اما زنده پیدا شد؛ زمانی که او در انتظار محاکمه به اتهام قاچاق جنسی قرار داشت. در این نوشته آمده است: «ماه‌ها درباره من تحقیق کردند؛ هیچ چیزی پیدا نکردند!!!» و در ادامه نیز جملاتی با لحنی ناامیدانه و طعنه‌آمیز دیده می‌شود.

6 Aug 2026, 13:59 UTC46 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

♨️افشاگری در کنگره: «دروغ‌های دولت ترامپ درباره ارتباط با اپستین رو می‌شود». 🔹️«جیمز واکینشاو» نماینده کنگره هشدار داد مقامات مرتبط با دولت ترامپ باید درباره روابط پنهان با جفری اپستین در برابر کمیته نظارت پاسخ‌گو شوند. 🔹 دولت ترامپ درباره ارتباط با اپستین فقط انحراف، انکار و فریب ارائه می‌دهد. 🔹 «هاوارد لاتنیک، وزیر بازرگانی، درباره سفر به جزیره اپستین و عمق رابطه‌اش دروغ گفته است.

6 Aug 2026, 13:59 UTC43 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

♨️پای وزیر بازرگانی آمریکا به پرونده فساد جنسی #اپستین باز شد ‌ 🔹مادلین دین، نماینده ایالت پنسیلوانیا در مجلس نمایندگان آمریکا،از رابطه هاوارد لوتنیک، وزیر بازرگانی آمریکا با پرونده فساد جنسی اپستین پرده برداشت.

6 Aug 2026, 13:58 UTC43 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

♨️افشاگری متحد سابق ترامپ: ترامپ برای جلوگیری از انتشار اسناد #اپستین با کنگره جنگید 🔹️ماجری گریین نماینده سابق کنگره آمریکا: اینکه او تهدید به نابودی کامل یک تمدن می‌کند باید جدی گرفته شود، این یعنی او تمایل دارد زنان و کودکان آن سرزمین را بکشد. مسئله سلامت روان اون باید جدی گرفته شود. 🔹️ترامپ در سال 2024 قول پیگیری در پرونده اپستین را داده بود اما وقتی رئیس جمهور شد با ما در کنگره برای جلوگیری از انتشار اسناد جنگ

6 Aug 2026, 13:58 UTC43 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

♨️سخنرانی بزرگ ملانیا ترامپ! در این ویدئوی وایرال شده، کمدین‌ها با تقلید چهره خانواده «دونالد ترامپ»، سراغ پرونده‌های جنجالی این روزهای آمریکا مثل ماجرای «اپستین« و «دیدی» رفته‌اند. #اپستین

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @afshgary. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 799,389 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“اپستین” (@afshgary), 382 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/afshgary.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.