4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +50. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 595–660 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 17:44
652
+47
6 Aug 2026, 17:47
605
no change
6 Aug 2026, 14:21
605
+3
6 Aug 2026, 08:19
602
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
68.8%
avg views ÷ 652 subscribers
Avg views / post
449
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.66%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 18 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held
20 (25 July 2026 – 6 August 2026)
Views total
8,973
Reactions total
291
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Aug 2026, 17:47 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
291 reactions across 18 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
118
40.5%
👍
60
20.6%
👏
41
14.1%
🔥
21
7.22%
👎
16
5.50%
😁
16
5.50%
🤡
7
2.41%
😭
6
2.06%
😍
5
1.72%
🫡
1
0.344%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 291reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
For the second time in the past week, freedom fighters of the Afghanistan Freedom Front launched rocket attacks on a gathering of Taliban militias being deployed to Badakhshan Province, disrupting the group's reinforcement transfers to the battlefield.
The rocket attack targeted the military section of Kunduz Airfield at approximately 10:00 p.m. on Wednesday, August 5, 2026. The strike hit a concentration of Taliban…
حملات موشکی به میدانهوایی نظامی کندز
مبارزان جبهه آزادی برای دومین بار در یک هفتهٔ گذشته با انجام حملات راکتی بر تجمع طالبان اعزامی به ولایت بدخشان روند انتقال دسته های تقویتی این گروه به خطوط جنگ را مختل کرده اند.
شلیک موشک بالای بخش نظامی فرودگاه کندز حوالی ساعت ۱۰:۰۰ شب چهارشنبه ۱۴ اسد ۱۴۰۵ انجام شده و تجمع ملیشههای طالبان در اطراف چرخبال های نظامی در این پایگاه هدف قرار گرفته است.
قرارگاه قولاردوی شمالشرق …
Afghanistan Freedom Front (AFF) forces successfully repelled a coordinated Taliban assault against AFF defensive positions and strongholds in Zebak District, Badakhshan Province, on Wednesday, 5 August 2026.
The engagement continued for approximately four hours. AFF forces maintained control of their defensive positions throughout the operation.
Following the failed Taliban assault, AFF units conducted coordinated c…
دفع حملات طالبان در زیباک ولایت بدخشان
مبارزان جبهه آزادی افغانستان امروز چهارشنبه ۱۴ اسد ۱۴۰۵ خورشیدی حملات تهاجمی گروه تروریستی طالبان را بر سنگر ها و استحکامات خود با موفقیت دفع کردند.
درگیری کماندوهای جبهه آزادی با ملیشه های طالبان از پس از چاشت امروز آغاز شده و چهار ساعت ادامه داشت.
مبارزان جبهه آزادی پس از دفع حملات گروه تروریستی طالبان، ضدحمله را از چندین استقامت با استفاده از سلاحهای سبک و سنگین علیه دشمن…
Five Foreign Terrorists Killed or Wounded in Zebak, Badakhshan
Yesterday, Freedom Front fighters carried out a coordinated ambush on the route leading to Zebak District, Badakhshan Province, targeting a group of foreign terrorists fighting alongside the Taliban.
The targeted individuals were identified as foreign affiliates and supporters of the Taliban who were unfamiliar with the local language and were attemptin…
پنج کشته و زخمی تروریستان خارجی در زیباک بدخشان
مبارزان جبهه آزادی روز جمعه، ۹ اسد ۱۴۰۵، در یک کمین سازماندهیشده در مسیر منتهی به ولسوالی زیباک ولایت بدخشان، شماری از تروریستان بینالمللی حامی طالبان را هدف قرار دادهاند
مبارزان جبهه آزادی تعدادی از همکاران و حامیان خارجی گروه تروریستی طالبان را که با زبان بومی منطقه آشنایی نداشته و قصد داشتند برای جنگ علیه مبارزان جبهه آزادی به زیباک بپیوندند، شناسایی کرده و…
Missile Attack on Kunduz Military Airport
Freedom Front fighters carried out missile strikes on Kunduz Military Airport at 9:00 p.m. on Thursday, July 30, 2026 (8 Asad 1405), targeting helicopters transporting fighters of the Taliban terrorist group.
Based on intelligence regarding enemy deployments, Freedom Front fighters launched precision missile strikes against Taliban personnel preparing to deploy from Kunduz …
حملات موشکی به فرودگاه نظامی کندز
مبارزان جبهه آزادی، حوالی ساعت ۹:۰۰ شب پنجشنبه ۸ اسد ۱۴۰۵ خورشیدی، به فرودگاه نظامی کندز و بالای چرخبالهای حامل تفنگداران گروه تروریستی طالبان حملات موشکی انجام دادهاند
مبارزان جبهه آزادی با اشراف اطلاعاتی از مفرزه های دشمن، حملات موشکی هدفمند را بالای تروریستان در حال اعزام به ولایت بدخشان در فرودگاه نظامی کندز انجام داده اند.
در نتیجه این حملات، تلفات و خسارات جدی به این گرو…
دفع حملات گروه طالبان در زیباک بدخشان
مبارزان جبهه آزادی حوالی ساعت ۱۰ شب گذشته، ۵ اسد ۱۴۰۵ خورشیدی، چندین حمله گروه تروریستی طالبان در زیباک ولایت بدخشان را با ایستادگی قاطع دفع کردند.
مبارزان جبهه آزادی پس از دفع این حملات، از دو محور دست به ضدحمله علیه گروه تروریستی طالبان زدند که در نتیجه، گروه طالبان با تلفات سنگین، مجبور به فرار از ساحه نبرد شدند.
در این درگیری، ۵ تن از افراد گروه تروریستی طالبان کشته و ۴ تن…
اعلامیه جبهه آزادی
در پیوند به درگذشت مرحوم داکتر عبدالغفور روان فرهادی
جبهۀ آزادی افغانستان، با اندوه عمیق، درگذشت مرحوم داکتر عبدالغفور روان فرهادی، دیپلومات برجسته، ادیب، پژوهشگر، مترجم نامدار، استاد دانشگاه و یکی از چهرههای ماندگار فرهنگ و سیاست افغانستان را به خانواده گرامی ایشان، جامعه علمی و فرهنگی کشور و همه مردم افغانستان تسلیت عرض میدارد.
مرحوم داکتر روان فرهادی از شخصیتهای کمنظیر افغانستان بود که عمر…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @afgfreedomaff. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 296,335 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“جبهه آزادی افغانستان / د افغانستان دخپلواكي جبهه” (@afgfreedomaff), 652 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/afgfreedomaff.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.