Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for نشر آفاق / آفاق معرفت

Channel

نشر آفاق / آفاق معرفت

@afagh_book

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

718subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001007932402
TypeChannel
Username@afagh_book
CreatedBetween 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live23 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 23 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/afagh_book

Growth

717718717.56 August 2026 — 717 subscribers6 August 2026 — 717 subscribers23 August 2026 — 718 subscribers6 August 202623 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 17 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 717–718 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
23 Aug 2026, 18:45718+1
6 Aug 2026, 20:32717no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:27717first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 29 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.6%
avg views ÷ 718 subscribers
Avg views / post
148
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.903%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026
Posts held20 (29 January 202630 July 2026)
Views total443
Reactions total4
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 20:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

24 reactions across 13 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1458.3%
😍729.2%
👏312.5%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 January 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 18:44 UTC190 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

📚 اگر وحی، رؤیای پیامبر باشد، چه تغییری در فهم ما از قرآن ایجاد می‌شود؟ «تأملی بر رؤیاهای رسولانه» نوشته علیرضا رحیمیان، نقدی مستند و خواندنی بر نظریه مشهور «رؤیاهای رسولانه» دکتر عبدالکریم سروش است. این کتاب با زبانی روشن، به پرسش‌هایی درباره وحی، نبوت، خاتمیت و تعبیرپذیری شریعت پاسخ می‌دهد و استدلال‌های این نظریه را به نقد می‌کشد. 📖 اگر دوست دارید پیش از قضاوت، استدلال‌ها را بخوانید، این کتاب را از دست ندهید. 💬

1😍1

30 Jul 2026, 08:12 UTC110 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Poll

شما ترجیح می‌دهید درباره اندیشه‌های چالش‌برانگیز فقط بشنوید یا خودتان آن‌ها را بخوانید و قضاوت کنید؟

  1. بشنوید45%
  2. بخوانید و خودتان قضاوت کنید.60%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

👏1

27 Jul 2026, 15:36 UTC143 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

✨ سلمان؛ مردی که برای یافتن حقیقت، تمام دنیا را پشت سر گذاشت... از سرزمین سپاهان تا مدائن، از جست‌وجوی حقیقت تا افتخار «سلمان محمدی» شدن؛ این کتاب روایت زندگی مردی است که پیامبر اکرم ﷺ درباره‌اش فرمود: «سلمان از ما اهل‌بیت است.» 📖 «سلمان فارسی؛ از سپاهان تا مدائن» ترجمه‌ای ارزشمند از کتاب نفس‌الرحمان فی فضائل سلمان است که با قلم دکتر سید حسن افتخارزاده، زندگی، فضائل، کرامات و جایگاه بی‌نظیر سلمان فارسی را بر اساس

😍1

23 Jul 2026, 18:50 UTC179 views0 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

" حُسنِ حَسن" دعوتی است تا کریم اهل‌بیت(ع) را دوباره بشناسی؛ شناختی که پس از خواندنش، نگرش تو به امام حسن(ع) دیگر مانند پیش نخواهد بود. اگر در روزهای شهادت ایشان می‌خواهی گامی برای شناخت بیشتر برداری، این کتاب را از دست نده. 🖤 سلام بر امام حسن مجتبی(ع)، کریم اهل‌بیت. آثار و برکات و آداب زیارت امام حسین سلام الله علیها 🟣 خرید اینترنتی از سایت: afaghbook.com 🟠 کانال ایتا: https://eitaa.com/afagh_book 🟢 کانال بله: ht

22 Jul 2026, 08:26 UTC198 viewsread 6 August 2026
Poll

«چقدر از زندگی امام حسن(ع) را می‌شناسیم؟

  1. خیلی کم23%
  2. دوست دارم بیشتر بشناسم77%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

20 Jul 2026, 19:31 UTC222 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

📚 تجریه شیرین زیارت ( دوجلدی) ✍اثر: محمد حسین یوسفی آثار و برکات و آداب زیارت امام حسین سلام الله علیها 🟣 خرید اینترنتی از سایت: Www.afaghbook.com 🟠 کانال ایتا: https://eitaa.com/afagh_book 🟢 کانال بله: https://ble.ir/afagh_book ☎️ تلفن دفتر فروش: ۰۲۱۲۲۸۴۷۰۳۵ 🌍 @afagh_book

3

27 Feb 2026, 08:44 UTC425 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

🌙 تا به حال از خودت پرسیده‌ای… چرا دعا می‌کنیم؟ چطور دعا کنیم؟ اصلاً دعا کردن یعنی چه؟ چرا بعضی دعاهایمان مستجاب نمی‌شود؟ از کجا بفهمیم دعایمان به اجابت نزدیک است؟ اگر این سؤال‌ها در دل تو هم هست، یعنی وقت نشستن بر بساط نیایش رسیده… 📘 بر بساط نیایش ✍️نوشته‌ی اصغر صادقی کتابی کوتاه، صمیمی و روشنگر برای فهمیدن معنای واقعی دعا؛

1

22 Feb 2026, 15:02 UTC318 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

📚کتاب نسیم سحرگاهان 👤 نام نویسنده: سیدحسین حسینی شامل دعاهای ابوحمزه ثمالی، افتتاح و سحر 🔖 قیمت داخل سایت: ۱/۲۸۰/۰۰۰ تومان @afagh_book | #معرفی_کتاب

😍1

18 Feb 2026, 14:48 UTC478 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

🌙بعضی آدم‌ها چراغ سحرند… بی‌هیاهو، بی‌نام و نشان؛ اما هر سحر، دل‌های زیادی را به آسمان وصل می‌کنند. 📘 «سفره‌دار سحرگاهان» نوشته‌ی صالحه سکوت کتابی کم‌حجم اما عمیق درباره‌ی ابوحمزه ثمالی؛ یار صدیق و مخلص امام سجاد(ع)، کتابی که بعد از خواندن آن دیگر مناجات سحر را مثل قبل نمی‌خوانی… ✨ خوش‌خوان، مستند، و دقیق ✨ مناسب برای مطالعه‌ی یک یا دو نشست ✨ انتخابی دلنشین برای شب‌های معنوی اگر دلت می‌خواهد سحرهایت فقط خواندن نباشد

1

17 Feb 2026, 15:06 UTC275 viewsread 6 August 2026
Video

✨️🌙 به شهر خدا نزدیک می‌شویم؛ آماده‌اید؟🌙 در ماه مبارک رمضان با ما همراه باشید.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @afagh_book. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

30 Jul 2026, 08:12 UTCAnonymous Poll20 voters

شما ترجیح می‌دهید درباره اندیشه‌های چالش‌برانگیز فقط بشنوید یا خودتان آن‌ها را بخوانید و قضاوت کنید؟

  1. بشنوید45%
  2. بخوانید و خودتان قضاوت کنید.60%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

22 Jul 2026, 08:26 UTCAnonymous Poll30 voters

«چقدر از زندگی امام حسن(ع) را می‌شناسیم؟

  1. خیلی کم23%
  2. دوست دارم بیشتر بشناسم77%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 January 2026 to 30 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“نشر آفاق / آفاق معرفت” (@afagh_book), 718 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/afagh_book.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.