Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for πŸ‡πŸˆβ€β¬›.. ⟩ TH” OPEN | AESTHECE

Channel

πŸ‡πŸˆβ€β¬›.. ⟩ TH” OPEN | AESTHECE

@aesthece

On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry

9,580subscribers

-111 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002116820409
TypeChannel
Username@aesthece
Descriptionγ…€β‹†Λ™βŠΉβ€. along accompanying dramatic dark night, bringing gusts from cold wind. similar an ice cube the exist melted, then touched. γ…€π™š. bot order: t.me/aesthecebot γ…€π™š. list admin: t.me/aesthece/131 γ…€π™š. testimonial: t.me/aesthecetestie
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live21 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 21 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/aesthece

Growth

9,5809,6919,635.57 August 2026 β€” 9,691 subscribers7 August 2026 β€” 9,691 subscribers11 August 2026 β€” 9,679 subscribers14 August 2026 β€” 9,653 subscribers17 August 2026 β€” 9,616 subscribers21 August 2026 β€” 9,580 subscribers7 August 202621 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 13 days, net -111. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,563–9,708 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
21 Aug 2026, 02:239,580-36
17 Aug 2026, 18:249,616-37
14 Aug 2026, 07:179,653-26
11 Aug 2026, 09:029,679-12
7 Aug 2026, 17:169,691no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:069,691first reading

Engagement

99 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR Β· 30 days
2.18%
avg views Γ· 9,580 subscribers
Avg views / post
209
77 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.634%
reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
Posts in window
87
of 99 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 77 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 23 August 2026
Posts held99 (22 July 2026 – 23 August 2026)
Views total16,100
Reactions total45
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface β€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken23 Aug 2026, 23:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than β€œcorrecting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β€” 8.12K, 3.7M β€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
113
Videos
2
Links
475

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 August 2026 β€” not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

46 reactions across 13 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁1328.3%
❀817.4%
πŸ˜‡715.2%
❀‍πŸ”₯36.52%
πŸ•Š36.52%
πŸ’…24.35%
πŸ”₯24.35%
πŸ€—24.35%
🀩24.35%
πŸ¦„24.35%
😍12.17%
🫑12.17%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 99 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 46reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 99 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 23 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 Aug 2026, 01:46 UTC196 views3 reactionsread 23 August 2026

γ…€γ…€γ…€γ…€γ…€γ…€μ œμ‚Ό – OPENED γ…€β₯. th’ strong wind passed here and there, but it was cool and made the heart cheerful. because today, we are open and can accept orders again. please see the price list listed, as well as others. don't be fooled and cause chaos, be a wise customer. γ…€γ…€γ…€γ…€βš˜. catalogue γ…€γ…€γ…€γ…€βš˜. format order γ…€γ…€γ…€γ…€βš˜. list admin γ…€γ…€γ…€γ…€βš˜. regulations γ…€γ…€γ…€γ…€βš˜. testimonial don't miss this, πŸΎπŸˆβ€β¬›οΈ.

πŸ˜‡3

22 Aug 2026, 15:52 UTC274 views3 reactionsread 23 August 2026

γ…€γ…€γ…€γ…€γ…€γ…€μ œμ‚Ό – CLOSED γ…€β₯. strong winds passing here and there, which had a bad impact, made the atmosphere tense. because precisely at this time, we are closed and cannot accept orders. we give you my deepest thanks, see you tomorrow with a happy heart and good mood. Thankyou for today, Λšβ‹†Λ™βœ§β‹†.

🀩2😁1

22 Aug 2026, 11:28 UTC403 views12 reactionsread 23 August 2026

teleprem/telestars fast yaa ay, gass order @aesthecebot

😁5πŸ˜‡2❀1πŸ•Š1πŸ€—1πŸ¦„1🫑1

22 Aug 2026, 01:17 UTC444 views3 reactionsread 23 August 2026

γ…€γ…€γ…€γ…€γ…€γ…€μ œμ‚Ό – OPENED γ…€β₯. th’ strong wind passed here and there, but it was cool and made the heart cheerful. because today, we are open and can accept orders again. please see the price list listed, as well as others. don't be fooled and cause chaos, be a wise customer. γ…€γ…€γ…€γ…€βš˜. catalogue γ…€γ…€γ…€γ…€βš˜. format order γ…€γ…€γ…€γ…€βš˜. list admin γ…€γ…€γ…€γ…€βš˜. regulations γ…€γ…€γ…€γ…€βš˜. testimonial don't miss this, πŸΎπŸˆβ€β¬›οΈ.

❀2😁1

21 Aug 2026, 15:50 UTC363 views2 reactionsread 23 August 2026

γ…€γ…€γ…€γ…€γ…€γ…€μ œμ‚Ό – CLOSED γ…€β₯. strong winds passing here and there, which had a bad impact, made the atmosphere tense. because precisely at this time, we are closed and cannot accept orders. we give you my deepest thanks, see you tomorrow with a happy heart and good mood. Thankyou for today, Λšβ‹†Λ™βœ§β‹†.

πŸ¦„1😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 99 posts we hold for @aesthece. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank β€” 414,157 of 1,585,381entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β€” republished posts weigh more than named mentions β€” and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β€” a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels β€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β€” the β€œNamed by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œπŸ‡πŸˆβ€β¬›.. ⟩ TH” OPEN | AESTHECE” (@aesthece), 9,580 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aesthece.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.