Channel
@aesopiancinema
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
289subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002128731781 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @aesopiancinema |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/aesopiancinema |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:36 | 289 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:32 | 289 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 26 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (26 June 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 687 |
| Reactions total | 71 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 23:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
165 reactions across 17 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 99 | 60.0% | |
| ❤🔥 | 50 | 30.3% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 3.64% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 2.42% | |
| 💋 | 3 | 1.82% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 1.21% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 0.606% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 165reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
(3/3) В этом смысле сюжет про синоптика Маргарет (безупречная и весёлая роль Эмили Блант), после контакта третьей степени с птицей кардиналом ненароком спасающую не просто мир, а достоинство землян в разрешении конфликта с пострадавшей инопланетной расой, близка не только прежним фантастическим опусам режиссёра, но и традициям «Списка Шиндлера», «Линкольна» — фильмам, где неправдоподобности как критерия оценки не бы…
❤8
(2/3) Конечно, это тот случай, когда нужно обязательно составить своё мнение, и радость, что шероховатое, непарадное во всех смыслах кино идёт парадом по кинотеатрам России, за что огромное спасибо прокатчику. Спасибо вообще за тот факт, что есть ещё что-то, что вызывает искреннее желание обсуждать, соглашаться и не соглашаться. Тем временем, в новом фильме Спилберга почти нет той моральной серой зоны, неразрешимос…
❤4
«Непокой» / «День разоблачения» (1/3) Отвечая себе на вопрос, почему я не смог полюбить и в полной мере разделить восторги коллег от «Непокоя» Леонида Шмелькова, вдруг нашёл ответ у Стивена Спилберга (о нём ниже). Всё у Шмелькова впечатляющее, запоминающееся. Отель, за пределами которого трындец всем народам мира. Его эффектная хозяйка Мадам Роза, буквально розовая, одинокая и пессимистичная. Её постояльцы, один яр…
❤5
Смотрим и обсуждаем классику японского кино: четвертое заседание Киноклуба Музея Льва Толстого Что такое подлинное счастье, семейное и не только? И возможно ли оно сегодня, реально ли стремиться к гармонии, подобно героине толстовского «Семейного счастия», заявляя: «Я не хочу играть в жизнь, я хочу жить»? На встречах Киноклуба «В поисках дома» мы смотрим и обсуждаем фильмы, герои которых через поиск родного дома ст…
❤8
Уже в этот четверг 30 июля в 18:00 — шедевр Мидзогути и обсуждение в прекрасной компании в любимом Каретном сарае. Как всегда, всем очень рады! 🏮 Ссылка на регистрацию
❤🔥2🕊1
С воодушевлением слушал Дениса Захарова на презентации в Фаланстере его новой книги «Капоте в СССР», вышедшей в издательстве с веселым названием «Найди лесоруба». Автор прицельно занимается темой Капоте много лет, начав под конец нулевых, продолжая в десятые, когда можно было себе представить выход впервые на русском самого раскованного романа Капоте «Услышанные молитвы», к которому Захаров написал отдельной книгой р…
❤11
Photo, posted without a caption
⚡2❤2
Теперь на вопрос, зачем учиться киноведению во ВГИКе, имею конкретный ответ: чтобы понять, что, сколько в микрофон на кинопоказах ни говори, а подкравшаяся кошка всё равно скажет красноречивее
❤🔥16🥰6❤3💋3
Анонс: в поисках дома ищем Пелевина и себя 🖍 Уже в этот четверг 16 июля вновь встречаемся в Каретном сарае в Усадьбе Толстого. Смотрим один короткий и один длинный фильмы: загадочный «Быть Виктором Пелевиным. Кем-кем?» Ивана Толстого и «Тайное влечение» Стаси Толстой, в свое время очень точно выделенное на Московском фестивале за дерзость и искренность дебюта. И обсуждаем с прекрасными авторами Ссылка на регистраци…
❤🔥10
Третье заседание Киноклуба: два фильма разных авторов На очередном заседании Киноклуба «В поисках дома» будем смотреть «Тайное влечение» (2022) Стаси Толстой и «Быть Виктором Пелевиным. Кем-кем?» (2020) Ивана Толстого. Вместе с режиссёрами обсудим, как в этих фильмах раскрываются краеугольные вопросы мироздания: как найти себя, и что в нашей жизни настоящее, подлинное, а что — лишь таковым притворяется. Приглашен…
❤13
АЛЕКСАНДР ГЕНИС, «ПЕРСОНАЛИИ. СРЕДИ СОВРЕМЕННИКОВ» (Редакция Елены Шубиной, 2025) (автор книги признан иноагентом в РФ) «Перечислять авторов и сравнивать их было счастьем, причем таким, о каком мечтал Сталкер у Стругацких: “для всех и даром”». С творчеством Гениса у меня не всегда в полной мере ладилось. Смущал чрезмерный нарциссизм, снобизм, сочившийся между строк в отношении к описываемым людям и явлениям. С люб…
❤7
Photo, posted without a caption
❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @aesopiancinema. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,019,922 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Эзоповым языком” (@aesopiancinema), 289 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aesopiancinema.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.