Long printing 🥱

Channel
Paul’s Trades - (CRYPTO CENTRAL)
@aeiocrypto
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
368subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001158895098 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @aeiocrypto |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 20 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 20 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/aeiocrypto |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 20 Aug 2026, 01:36 | 368 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:32 | 369 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:22 | 369 | first reading |
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 18 April 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
⚠️CPI in 30 minutes, expect volatility. Hint: No white house leak can mean they like the number
Paul’s Trades - (CRYPTO CENTRAL) pinned a photo
PNL Summary JUNE 1st -> 30th JUNE 🚀 Over the course of 22 days, we completed trades with a total profit of 465% with an accuracy of 67% with only 3 losers throughout the entire month. Unfortunately there was a period in this month where I was going through something personal and it effected my trading. We had 3 losers in a row and admitably I was trading with too much emotion. I took some time off to recover and ca…
CPI 9.1% Expected CPI 8.8% Worse than anticipated…again 😫
Since this message (CPI news release) BTC is now down 17%. Much much more to come 🩸
CPI expected - 8.3% Actual CPI YoY - 8.6% Not good.
‼️ CPI news again today in the next few hours. Wonder will our VIP members call bullshit on the false move as we did last time…? 💰🤑
Paul’s Trades - (CRYPTO CENTRAL) pinned a photo
PNL Summary May 1st -> 31st May 🚀 Over the course of 31 days, we completed trades with a msg profit of 523% with an accuracy of 78.57% with only 3 losers throughout the entire month. With the LUNA dump wrecking markets and ignoring TA (although we informed users to short in chat, just not publicly) AND a 14 day ranging market, naturally we were unable to produce as many calls as we would’ve liked. Also I personally…
Did you see the nice FOMC pump? We alerted our members to long 2 days prior, May 2nd. Entry was available for over 24hrs giving an opporunity for every member to enter. Gave us a nice 97% return on 20x leverage thus far Great start to the month of May for our VIPs 🚀
Paul’s Trades - (CRYPTO CENTRAL) pinned a photo
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @aeiocrypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Paul’s Trades - (CRYPTO CENTRAL)” (@aeiocrypto), 368 subscribers as measured 20 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aeiocrypto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.