Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

aehyeta

@aehyeta

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

170subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003708210943
TypeChannel
Username@aehyeta
Descriptionписать по вопросам/заказу эдита: @aehyetaa
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/aehyeta

Growth

1707 Aug 2026, 18:34 — 170 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 15:01 — 170 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 18:348 Aug 2026, 15:01
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 169–171 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 15:01170no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:34170first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 19 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
135.5%
avg views ÷ 170 subscribers
Avg views / post
230
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
11.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held20 (19 July 20268 August 2026)
Views total4,607
Reactions total400
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 15:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
16
Videos
27
Links
3

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
3m 22s
Average length
22s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

400 reactions across 14 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54453154408867111015614.0%
custom 5470092785094765546369.00%
🔥358.75%
328.00%
custom 5431819472526665601297.25%
custom 5971802921556254292287.00%
custom 5409010709398842470256.25%
custom 5406915933589484241215.25%
custom 5409302719930327121215.25%
custom 5429487983889773833205.00%
💋205.00%
🍌153.75%
😍153.75%
❤‍🔥112.75%
🥰102.50%
🎉82.00%
🤩51.25%
custom 531020135750699569641.00%
41.00%
custom 524268731488223420020.5%
2 further kinds30.75%

Custom emoji. 10 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 400reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @aehyeta. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 July 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 00:19 UTC52 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

🤩мне бы такой дискомфорт🤩 пересматривать марвел лучшее решение за этот год #наташа

custom 53102013575069956964🤩3custom 59718029215562542923custom 52426873148822342002custom 54069159335894842412custom 54294879838897738332custom 54453154408867111012custom 54700927850947655462

5 Aug 2026, 18:21 UTC106 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🎉 Результаты розыгрыша: 🏆 Победители: 1. 。⋆.ೃ࿔* (@fezeis) 2. ã (@warxixu) 3. T🐈‍⬛ (@l1ucx1) 4. poliksmm 5. 𝒌𝒂𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒓𝒊𝒏𝒆 (@Katherine1473) 6. Alena (@Mixesttss) 7. ‘ vicky (@veqsly) 8. SL (@sslve) 9. . 10. 𝗏𝗂𝖼𝗄𝗒 ʸᵒᵘⁿᵍ (@mmslly) ✔️Проверить результаты

custom 544531544088671110154💋4🥰1

4 Aug 2026, 19:15 UTC346 views41 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

🤩ну чутчут самовлюбленная🤩 сдт: @werrriw111 меня заставили #кэтринпирс

custom 544531544088671110110custom 54090107093988424708🔥6custom 54069159335894842414custom 54093027199303271213custom 59718029215562542923❤‍🔥2custom 54294879838897738332

4 Aug 2026, 08:01 UTC411 views36 reactionsread 8 August 2026

розыгрыш на 10 мишек подписки @aehyeta @flynaep

🔥11💋8custom 54453154408867111018😍5custom 540901070939884247031

3 Aug 2026, 15:43 UTC160 views34 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

🤩дэдди🤩 шпарит как на родном #питерпаркер

🍌10custom 54453154408867111016🎉5💋2custom 54069159335894842412custom 54093027199303271212custom 54700927850947655462custom 59718029215562542922

27 Jul 2026, 21:43 UTC207 views38 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

🤩маленький чорни мальчик🤩 scp: @flynaep ну вылитый француз #парадеевич

custom 54318194725266656019custom 54093027199303271217custom 54069159335894842416custom 54700927850947655463custom 59718029215562542923💋2🔥2custom 54294879838897738332

25 Jul 2026, 20:01 UTC187 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

хоть где-то забрали кубок ну мои

custom 544531544088671110195

25 Jul 2026, 17:36 UTC297 views47 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

🤩потрачу на тебяяя🤩 id: @dt7dv под милого ублюдка заебись #деймон #делена

custom 5431819472526665601118custom 54700927850947655468❤‍🔥4custom 54069159335894842413custom 54090107093988424703custom 54093027199303271213custom 59718029215562542923

25 Jul 2026, 08:04 UTC570 views31 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

🤩ненавидеть🤩 id: @flynaep я уже ненавижу эту песню клянусь #кол

custom 54453154408867111017custom 54700927850947655465❤‍🔥4🔥2😍2custom 54069159335894842412custom 54090107093988424702custom 54093027199303271212

24 Jul 2026, 18:22 UTC266 views30 reactions10 Starsread 8 August 2026
Video

🤩пьяные танцы🤩 collab: @dt7dv наконец-то коллаб с зарой, сделали со своими крашами чисто #наташа #баки #коллаб

custom 54090107093988424707custom 54318194725266656016custom 54700927850947655465custom 54453154408867111013custom 54093027199303271212custom 54294879838897738332custom 597180292155625429221

22 Jul 2026, 20:29 UTC164 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

моя любовь бля

custom 54294879838897738338🔥5😍52🥰2🤩1custom 54069159335894842411custom 54093027199303271211

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @aehyeta. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 282,960 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“aehyeta” (@aehyeta), 170 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aehyeta.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.