Channel
@aegisinform
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
94subscribers
+8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003478785344 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @aegisinform |
| Created | 3 March 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 21 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/aegisinform |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 09:06 | 94 | +8 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:31 | 86 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:32 | 86 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 3 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
2 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 3 March 2026 to 5 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⭐️Dev Estrela⭐️ 🟢Requisitos: •Um ou Mais projetos Lançados anteriormente ✔️ •Proof of Work: Provou a competência e honestidade em projetos passados ✔️ •Rendeu 1.5x ou Mais nos Projetos Passados ✔️ 💥Riscos: - Scam: Extremamente Baixo - Perda de Fundos Parcial(Défice de Pool): Médio ⚙️Como Abordar? •Um projeto de Dev Estrela não é uma isenção de riscos, mas um melhor posicionamento em relação aos outros projetos do…
❤2
⚠️Altíssimo Risco/Recompensa‼️ ⚙️Jogos que contém os seguintes riscos: - Desenvolvedor desconhecido - ROI Curto (3 a 7 Dias) (Naturalmente insustentável) Risco Altíssimo de: Perda de Fundos Parcial ou Total. 📌Como Abordar? Entre apenas no primeiro dia do lançamento. - Não Reinvista - Se divulgar, avise dos riscos a todos(seja responsável) - Se o dinheiro fizer falta, não invista. 🔔Se você for novo aqui: Leia‼️
⚠️Baixo Risco/Recompensa ⚙️Jogos que contém os seguintes riscos: - Empresa Séria (Registada verificável no X ou algum orgão empresacional) - ROI Incerto (Pode ganhar muito, ou Pouco) (Potencial de duração longa, nesse caso Anos) Risco Baixo de: Perda de Fundos Parcial ou Total. 📌Como Abordar? Nesse caso o ROI é incerto, portanto é viável investigar sempre se o jogo ainda paga o suficiente para compensar o seu invest…
⚠️Médio Risco/Recompensa ⚙️Jogos que contém os seguintes riscos: - Desenvolvedor desconhecido - ROI Médio (40-75 Dias) (Potencial de duração longa 5 a 7 Meses) Risco Médio de: Perda de Fundos Parcial ou Total. 📌Como Abordar? Entre no máximo até 40% do tempo total do ROI (Por exemplo: Roi de 60 dias, você entra no máximo até ao 24º dia do lançamento.) - - Se divulgar, avise dos riscos a todos(seja responsável) - Se …
⚠️Alto Risco/Recompensa ⚙️Jogos que contém os seguintes riscos: - Desenvolvedor desconhecido - ROI Curto (7 a 30 dias) (Naturalmente insustentável) Risco Alto de: Perda de Fundos Parcial ou Total. 📌Como Abordar? Entre no máximo até 20% do tempo total do ROI (Por exemplo: Roi de 30 dias, você entra no máximo até ao 6º dia do lançamento.) - Não Reinvista - Se divulgar, avise dos riscos a todos(seja responsável) - Se…
⚠️ IMPORTANTE ⚠️ Como Abordar jogos NFT com base em Pool de Liquidez? 👇🏻 🔍 1. Pesquise o projeto Antes de colocar dinheiro, entenda quem está por trás, qual é a proposta e se tem credibilidade. 💰 2. Avalie os riscos x retorno esses jogos podem ter ganhos altos, mas também perdas grandes. Veja se o risco cabe no seu perfil. 📊 3. Diversifique Nunca coloque tudo em um único jogo. Espalhe os investimentos para reduzi…
Aqui serão postados todos os guias relacionados ao mundo NFT, façam sempre um estudo antes ✔️
Channel created
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @aegisinform. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 521,418 of 1,620,455entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“AegisNFTs - Guia” (@aegisinform), 94 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aegisinform.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.