🐬. how's life, Aegi?
👍10❤1

Channel
@aegasofc
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
785subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002709753984 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @aegasofc |
| Description | ★☆⸝⸝ ׅ 𝐀𝚛𝚌𝚑𝚒𝚟𝚎 ── @archiveaegas ★☆⸝⸝ ׅ 𝐎𝚏𝚌 𝐁𝚘𝚝 ── @aegasofcbot ★☆⸝⸝ ׅ 𝐏𝚊𝚛𝚝𝚗𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚑𝚒𝚙 (open) ── @partnershipaegasbot & @mppsaegas ★☆⸝⸝ ׅ 𝐆𝚛𝚊𝚖𝚜 ── @aegasgram |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/aegasofc |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:15 | 785 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:03 | 785 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 9 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
38 reactions across 8 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 13 | 34.2% | |
| 👍 | 10 | 26.3% | |
| ❤ | 7 | 18.4% | |
| 🕊 | 3 | 7.89% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 5.26% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 5.26% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 2.63% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 38reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 9 May 2026 to 2 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🐬. how's life, Aegi?
👍10❤1
Halo Selamat Malam Aegi, Saya Jéricho Zacharias Selaku Owner dari 𝐀𝐄𝐆𝐀𝐒 𝗖𝗢𝗠𝗣𝗔𝗡𝗬 ingin menyampaikan informasi terkait dengan Keaktifan agensi. Di karena kan kesibukan irl admin yang tidak memungkinkan untuk melanjutkan ke Gen 10 Maka kami memutuskan untuk Hiatus mulai tanggal 17 - Mei - 2026 sampai waktu yang tidak dapat di tentukan. Keputusan untuk melaksanakan hiatus ini sudah kami pikirkan secara matang agar kami …
❤5🔥4🕊3😭1
Sticker, posted without a caption
https://t.me/+ekZqNVkuET1mOThl yang kemarin debut masuk sini yuk
Sticker, posted without a caption
/closing the announcement paper; smile at the trainee; clapping;/ ── ⣠ 🎤 𓊉 𝓓an sampailah kita di penghujung acara, this is the final moment dari hasil yang telah kalian raih melalui kerja keras, waktu, dan usaha yang luar biasa. ── ⣠ 🎤 𓊉 𝓢etiap langkah yang kalian ambil, semuanya telah membawa kalian sampai di titik ini. congratulation untuk yang sudah debut, you truly deserve it! dan untuk yang belum, ingat… janga…
Photo, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
₍ 🐉🌬 紹介 ₎ ༄.° In a world where reality softly blurs with dreams, ׅ꯱𝘱𝑖𝒓𝑖𝗍's 𝑹ᥱ᥎ᥱ𝒓𝒊ᥱ is born as a reflection of wandering souls and boundless imagination ִ 𖣖 ·· ۫ 𝅄 ִ this unit embodies the quiet whispers of spirits drifting through 𝘶𝘯𝘴𝘦𝘦𝘯 𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘭𝘴𝘮, 𝘨𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘦𝘧𝘶𝘭, 𝘦𝘯𝘪𝘨𝘮𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘤, and 𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘭𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘭𝘺 𝘤𝘢𝘱𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 ≈ ִֶָ. ..𓂃 ࣪ ִֶָ 🏯🪽་༘࿐ …
🔥5
Sticker, posted without a caption
⊹ ࣪ ﹏𓊝﹏𓂁﹏⊹ ࣪ ˖ 𝟶𝟷. Aaron Oliver D. @taffiete 174 + 172 + 178 + 176 = 700 🥉 𝟶𝟻. Annie Kaithlyn @braivnrot 168 + 172 + 176 + 171 = 687 𝟶𝟼. Brielle Rose C. @roscynne 174 + 170 + 171 + 181 = 696 🎖 𝟷𝟷. Edward J. Valtieri @Pvrotektif 170 + 176 + 170 + 179 = 692 𝟷𝟺. Fuyuka Miyuki @Mwyine 184 + 176 + 177 + 173 = 710 🥈 𝟷𝟾. Kalilá Amylee R. @vKedmarin 170 + 174 + 179 + 173 = 696 🎖 𝟷𝟿. Khayiya Mairish @syWonhee - +…
❤1
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @aegasofc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 321,719 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@aegasofc named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝗔𝗘𝗚𝗔𝗦 𝐂𝐎𝐌𝐏𝐀𝐍𝐘” (@aegasofc), 785 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aegasofc.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.