Channel
@advograd
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
1,056subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001643407975 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @advograd |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/advograd |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:32 | 1,056 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:06 | 1,054 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:40 | 1,054 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 19 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (19 June 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,666 |
| Reactions total | 109 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 16:40 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
204 reactions across 15 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 57 | 27.9% | |
| 💔 | 48 | 23.5% | |
| 😢 | 25 | 12.3% | |
| 🤬 | 16 | 7.84% | |
| 😱 | 12 | 5.88% | |
| 👍 | 10 | 4.90% | |
| 🌚 | 9 | 4.41% | |
| 😐 | 7 | 3.43% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 2.94% | |
| 🙈 | 5 | 2.45% | |
| 🤯 | 4 | 1.96% | |
| 😭 | 2 | 0.98% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.49% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.49% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 0.49% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 204reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
О реакции на происходящее Петербургские архитекторы, реставраторы и эксперты ГИКЭ по итогам обсуждения свежих поправок в 73-ФЗ подготовили письмо, в котором оценивают риски для объектов культурного наследия как "критические". Скоропалительные изменения Федерального закона «Об объектах культурного наследия (памятниках истории и культуры) народов Российской Федерации» не решают задачу совершенствования порядка провед…
❤6🔥6😱3👍2💔2
73-ФЗ не будет прежним На минувшей неделе Госдума завершила свою работу, парламентарии ушли на каникулы и соберутся теперь только в новом созыве, а значит, до октября новых законов не появится, и можно подвести итоги лета, после которого 73-ФЗ не будет прежним. Изменения, перевернувшие существующий порядок работы с памятниками, внесли двумя законами (180-ФЗ и 262-ФЗ, сравнение редакций здесь и здесь), зато какими! …
💔17😐7😢5🤯4❤1🤝1
Реестр памятников В последнее время часто рассказываю про реестр объектов культурного наследия, правильно было бы напомнить, что это такое. Единый государственный реестр объектов культурного наследия - это государственная информационная система <...>, включающая в себя банк данных об объектах культурного наследия п. 2 ст. 15 закона 73-ФЗ В реестре содержится информация о всех объектах культурного наследия России, …
❤10
File, posted without a caption
👍3
Статус памятника можно пересмотреть? Приняты и опубликованы поправки, предложенные Думой Ставропольского края, которые позволят регионам самим исключать объекты культурного наследия (ОКН) из реестра памятников. К чему это приведëт, не написал уже только ленивый, и даже Правовое управление Госдумы несколько месяцев назад было против. К третьему чтению законопроект дополнили, исключить ОКН из реестра теперь можно буд…
😱9💔7
Баллы за ценность В Москве, Ленинградской и Рязанской областях, а также некоторых других регионах действует балльная система оценки историко-культурной ценности, то есть, при рассмотрении заявления о выявлении ценность объекта измеряют в баллах. Значимость с точки зрения истории, архитектуры, градостроительства, науки и техники вычисляют по дате постройки, выразительности фасада, известности архитектора, сохранност…
❤11
Выявление по-новому Петербургский комитет по охране памятников давно жаловался на "перегруз" заявлениями о выявлении новых памятников, поэтому недавно в закон "Об охране объектов культурного наследия в Санкт-Петербурге" приняли поправки. Изменится ли что-то? Действительно, так как на время рассмотрения заявления о выявлении объект приобретает статус "объекта обладающего признаками объекта культурного наследия", кот…
❤4
Здесь не то, что на гражданке Одно время моя практика состояла только из споров с государственными органами, я рассказывала о том, какие по итогу сделала выводы 🤪 Это потом, когда появляются дела "на гражданке" вдруг понимаешь, что суд всë таки на чëм-то основывает своë решение, и оно именно такое не потому, что одна сторона процесса равнее другой. Не все административные споры одинаковы, но такое нередко встречае…
❤10😁1
Экспертиза не нужна Вслед за ГИКЭ для некоторых памятников хотят отменить и строительную экспертизу: "комплексный" законопроект предлагает упростить реконструкцию небольших объектов культурного наследия (ОКН). Для работ на памятнике, которые могут повлиять на его надëжность и безопасность (то есть, предполагают вмешательство в несущие конструкции), требуется заключение государственной строительной экспертизы. Дейс…
🤬7👍3❤2
Какие нововведения "комплексного" законопроекта примут?
The shares total 119%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Что отменят на этот раз? Готовится ко второму чтению "комплексный" законопроект, который предлагает множество разноплановых поправок в 73-ФЗ, Градкодекс и другие законы, о которых я рассказывала здесь (сравнительная таблица здесь). Как минимум, несколько предложений, как мне кажется, не должны войти в итоговую редакцию, т.к. уже получили отрицательный отзыв Правительства. Впрочем, не знаю, как вы, но я уже ничему н…
❤4😢3
Лицензия Министерства культуры Работы по сохранению памятника могут выполнять только организации и ИП, у которых есть лицензия Министерства культуры. Она подтверждает, что это делают подготовленные и опытные специалисты. Лицензия даëт право на один или несколько видов работ: ▪️разработку проектной документации и технический надзор за проведением работ по консервации, реставрации и воссозданию объектов культурного …
❤9👌1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @advograd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какие нововведения "комплексного" законопроекта примут?
The shares total 119%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 158,737 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Адвокат наследия 🏛” (@advograd), 1,056 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/advograd.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.