Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ADS KULT | Арбитраж трафика

@adskult

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

49subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003420308288
TypeChannel
Username@adskult
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/adskult

Growth

497 August 2026 — 49 subscribers10 August 2026 — 49 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 48–50 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 12:3149no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:4849first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 14 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
109.7%
avg views ÷ 49 subscribers
Avg views / post
53.8
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.9%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held20 (14 June 20269 August 2026)
Views total430
Reactions total47
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 12:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
16
Videos
1
Links
4

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
6s
Average length
6s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

118 reactions across 18 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4941.5%
🔥2622.0%
😁75.93%
🤣65.08%
👍54.24%
💯54.24%
😢43.39%
🥰43.39%
🤩32.54%
21.69%
👏21.69%
🤯21.69%
❤‍🔥10.847%
🕊10.847%
😱10.847%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 118reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 June 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 17:21 UTC14 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Кажется, нашли ещё один интересный способ чекать качество профиля 👀 Сегодня случайно заметили одну штуку. Регали Claude с разных FB-профилей. На одном сразу прилетела "Подозрительная активность", на другом с теми же действиями - регистрация прошла без вопросов. И тут стало интересно) У Claude довольно серьёзный антифрод, который чекает IP, fingerprint, устройство, локацию и ещё кучу сигналов, которые мы с вами да

2🔥1🥰1

31 Jul 2026, 13:44 UTC33 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Прогноз погоды по ФБ в данный момент: Облачно. Ожидаются осадки из заблоченых рк 😂 ФБ гадина, даже тупо из-за смены лимитов блочит кабы ) Вот и сделал рыжий выходной работягам в пятницу вечером )

😢2😁1

31 Jul 2026, 10:40 UTC36 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Ну что, первопроходцы! 😄 Спешим вас обрадовать вкуснятиной! 🤖 Запускаем персонального AI-аналитика внутри ADS KULT CRM Мы долго хотели сделать не просто CRM, где можно посмотреть баланс и заказы, а нормальный инструмент, которому можно задать любой вопрос обычным языком и сразу получить ответ по своим данным. Например: 🟢Какой кабинет открутил больше всего 🟢Сколько тима потратила на расходку 🟢Сделай полный фин от

3🤩21🔥1

25 Jul 2026, 17:20 UTC49 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🔗⚠️ Банит теперь ЦЕПОЧКАМИ Раньше как было - улетел соц, ну и ладно. Обидно, но БМ живой, кабы крутят, объявы льют. Сейчас же все чаще наблюдаем картину - улетел соц, следом ложится БМ. А за БМ выносит кабы, которые на нём висели. Прям как током по цепи. Дёрнуло в одном месте - выносит всю ветку целиком. Че делать: ‼️ Не держи всё на одной цепи. Если весь запуск завязан на одном соце и одном БМ со всеми кабами -

4👏1🥰1😢1

19 Jul 2026, 10:13 UTC62 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Все Шарманка работает 🌟 Заходим и смотрим если ничего не отвалилось

3🤣1😁1

19 Jul 2026, 09:27 UTC61 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

📱 Никогда такого не было! И вот опять ) Не сцым, ща свет в будку проведут обратно

😁3🤣2

15 Jul 2026, 16:08 UTC94 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Ребята! Короче, нашили закономерность Верифнутые БМы сейчас отлетают чаще, чем неверифнутые. Как бы парадоксально это не звучало) Хотя от ФБ чего-то логичного давно ожидать не стоит Протестили на выборке из 40 БМ: ⚠️ 14 из 20 ВЕРИФНУТЫХ улетели практически сразу. ✔️ 2 из 20 НЕВЕРИФНУТЫХ отлетели после тех же самых действий. Разница, мягко говоря, очень заметная. Если у кого-то сейчас тоже складывается ощущение,

4🔥2❤‍🔥1🤯1

15 Jul 2026, 13:00 UTC81 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🌟 Ну что, ребят… Трухануло вчера всех знатно ) Кажется вчера половина арбитражного ТГ вместо залива, сидела в чатах и просто аху**ала с происходящего) Хотя если поискать плюсы, то многим Цукер вчера просто оформил выходной ) Что увидели мы. Если честно, думали будет намного хуже. Кабы пережили всё вообще довольно спокойно. А вот БМы… там уже без шансов. Вериф, не вериф, старые, новые, многолетние… вообще пох*й.

🔥43👏1

14 Jul 2026, 09:19 UTC69 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

⚠️📱 Домен t.me получил статус serverHold и был исключён из глобального DNS на уровне реестра доменной зоны .me. Сам Telegram при этом продолжает работать. Если вы льёте трафик на Telegram-каналы, ботов или лички через t.me - Бегом меняйте ссылки на telegram.me Пока никто официально не объяснил, почему домен получил такой статус. Поэтому лучше исходить из того, что проблема может затянуться. 💬 @dima_adskult | 🌐

3🔥1🕊1🤯1😢1

12 Jul 2026, 09:21 UTC75 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🔴Ребята, сейчас фанка решает больше чем крео Заметили очень сильное влияние фанок на проход объяв. Особенно это чувствуют те, кто льёт жёсткий подход. Раньше можно было взять новорег или чуть прогретую фанку и лить. Сейчас с таких фанок проход стал намного меньше. А вот с ПЗРД фанок картина НАМНОГО лучше. Ради эксперимента сами протестили на жёстких подходах. Крео то же, подход тот же, различие только в фанке: ⚠

3🔥21

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @adskult. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 275,012 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ADS KULT | Арбитраж трафика” (@adskult), 49 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/adskult.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.