Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Реклама в новых реалиях | belle.jen

Channel

Реклама в новых реалиях | belle.jen

@adsbellejen

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

137subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001559126734
TypeChannel
Username@adsbellejen
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 October 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 10 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/adsbellejen

Topic

Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 25 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 36% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

137142139.57 August 2026 — 142 subscribers8 August 2026 — 142 subscribers9 September 2026 — 141 subscribers16 September 2026 — 139 subscribers1 October 2026 — 137 subscribers7 August 20261 October 2026
5 measurements spanning 55 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 136–143 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Oct 2026, 01:57137-2
16 Sept 2026, 21:19139-2
9 Sept 2026, 20:57141-1
8 Aug 2026, 22:01142no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:04142first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 6 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

94 reactions across 17 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤3638.3%
🔥2122.3%
👍1313.8%
💯99.57%
🙈88.51%
😁55.32%
😢11.06%
🤯11.06%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 94 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 6 November 2025 to 10 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Jul 2026, 16:45 UTC67 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Как же прекрасно летом, когда дневная жара уже спала, после своих бьюти процедур выйти, прогуляться по центру Москвы и сесть в любимой кофемании на Белорусской ❤️ И провести время с собой на веранде) Кто бы что не говорил — сервис, кофе и публика в кофемании мне нравится. Хочется возвращаться, у меня с кофеманией какая-то ассоциация замедления, хотя тут многие обсуждают работу и бизнес. Неспешно позавтракать, неспе…

❤6

24 Jun 2026, 12:07 UTC103 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

я не знаю, сколько можно развивать эти ИИ-стартапы Обязательно еще добавить пару слов типа B2B и SaaS. Слово «венчур» он уже добавил, молодец) это обязательно повысит стоимость его стартапа для инвесторов 😁 Правда потом эти стартапы инвесторам приносят -4 млрд прибыли, лично знаю такие кейсы Вы от них не устали?) просто мне уже надоело, что вокруг все об ии

❤1😁1

24 Jun 2026, 12:05 UTC93 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

На что рассчитывают люди, которые откуда-то взяли мой контакт и пишут мне со своими рекламными предложениями очередного ИИ-стартапа с вопросом «можно поспамить немного?» Нет, нельзя 🤡 кажется я не выгляжу как папка «корзина», чтобы мне спамить)))

❤1💯1😁1

10 Jun 2026, 14:34 UTC120 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Был на посту советника Президента РФ по развитию интернета 🥲

10 Jun 2026, 14:33 UTC111 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Вы не знакомы с Германом Клименко?

❤1

10 Jun 2026, 14:33 UTC107 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Этот вопрос я получаю стабильно раз в несколько месяцев. И мне уже даже обидно отвечать "нет", думаю, это знакомство бы открыло мне несколько дверей))

💯2❤1

4 Jun 2026, 09:29 UTC131 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Налоги растут, были риски, что мы перегнём палку, но не перегнули — Силуанов. @bankrollo

🙈2

4 Jun 2026, 09:29 UTC124 viewsread 8 August 2026

как проводилась оценка «не перегнули»…?

28 May 2026, 10:34 UTC177 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Промокод НАТАША на поездку в такси по Турции 😭😭😭 Email-маркетологам на заметку. Ждём от маркетологов золотого яблоко подборку санскринов для поездки в Египет по промокоду СВЕТА

❤5🙈1

23 Apr 2026, 15:32 UTC221 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ебануться, я в канале Вики Бони)))

🔥6😁3👍2🤯1

10 Feb 2026, 16:37 UTC277 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Рассказываю, почему я устала от ИИ-повестки и я начинаю все меньше верить в эту сферу и про недавнее интересное исследование, что ИИ на самом деле НЕ помогает ускорить работу сотрудников И, честно, я чувствую, как тупею. И как тупеют другие. Уже будто в маркетинге нет нормальных брейнштормов без гребаного ИИ. У всех отключилась способность думать и генерить. Зачем, если за тебя это сделают за 15 секунд..

❤11👍5

10 Feb 2026, 16:33 UTC226 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

👍6

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @adsbellejen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Реклама в новых реалиях | belle.jen” (@adsbellejen), 137 subscribers as measured 1 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/adsbellejen.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.