Channel
@ads_approved_channel_en
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
835subscribers
-90 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001716665708 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ads_approved_channel_en |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ads_approved_channel_en |
Hacking & security — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 01:39 | 835 | -18 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 19:19 | 853 | -16 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 06:47 | 869 | -13 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 04:55 | 882 | -18 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 19:38 | 900 | -20 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:36 | 920 | -5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:00 | 925 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:28 | 925 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 14 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
144 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 54 | 37.5% | |
| 🔥 | 39 | 27.1% | |
| 👍 | 35 | 24.3% | |
| 🥰 | 8 | 5.56% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 2.08% | |
| 👌 | 3 | 2.08% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 1.39% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 144 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 January 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔥 ГОТОВЫ К ЗАКАЗУ / READY FOR ORDER 🔥 У Farm Power всегда живой сток аккаунтов, документов и других материалов в наличии — можно забирать сразу, без ожиданий / Live account stock available now, ready to use. 📍 | OLD GMAIL | VCC | ADS VERIF | SPEND | 📍 ↪️ Готовые для запуска с ноги / Ready for instant work ↪️ Описание продукта / Full product description ↪️ GEO: 🇩🇪 🇧🇪 🇫🇷 ↪️Price: 55$ 📍 VERIFICATION | GOOGLE ADS 📍 ↪️…
❤🔥1
🌐 Why mobile proxies are more than just another IP Many proxy providers sell datacenter IPs disguised as mobile proxies. Most websites can easily detect the difference and limit or flag such connections Proxies.sx uses real 4G/5G devices connected to real carrier networks. To websites, your traffic looks like it comes from a regular mobile internet user 💠 95+ Trust Score 💠 500,000+ real mobile IPs 💠 17+ countries …
🔥2
🔥 Our friends at Nashiba.PRO are launching an intensive hands-on marathon on traffic arbitrage and online advertising. This isn't just theory—it's a structured learning program focused on real results. Over the course of 4 days, you'll go from the fundamentals to proven traffic strategies, gaining a clear understanding of how to actually make money in this niche. 👉 Who is this marathon for?– Complete beginners (st…
❤7👍2🔥2
Weekly Insight #3 — Why a High CTR Doesn’t Guarantee Results 🎯 A high CTR is often seen as the main sign of a winning creative. But in reality, it’s only the first step of the funnel 👀 What usually happens next: — users don’t find what the creative promised 📉 — the landing page fails to keep their attention 🧱 — the offer doesn’t match expectations 🎭 — conversion rates stay low 📊 As a result, you may get cheap clic…
👍6❤1🔥1
Weekly Insight #2 — why scaling breaks even profitable funnels 📈 On small budgets, many funnels show solid results. But once you start scaling, problems appear that were simply not visible before 👀 What usually breaks first: — weak landing structure 📉 — low-quality white flow 🧱 — slow load speed ⌛ — missing trust elements 🔍 With low traffic, the system can “absorb” these weaknesses. But at scale, every small issue…
❤5👍1🔥1
Need cards to pay for traffic? Details below 🚀 Pay2.House is a virtual card platform specifically for media buyers. We provide you with stable cards that link smoothly to Meta, Google Ads, and TikTok, are less likely to be rejected, and don't impact your accounts. 🤝 Convenient replenishment via USDT TRC20 without unnecessary banking steps 🤝 Clean BIN cards from different geographies: Estonia, Hong Kong, Singapore…
🔥4❤🔥2🥰1
Weekly Insight #1 — main reason for unstable funnels ⚠️ Most issues are not caused by traffic, but by a broken system structure. When creative, account, and landing are not aligned, the system reads it as inconsistency 🧠 What usually breaks performance: — mismatch between ad and landing expectations 🎯 — weak or empty white layer 🧱 — lack of structure 📉 — inconsistent tone and visual style 🎨 Even good traffic beco…
🥰3🔥2👌1
We’ve decided to launch a new series—Weekly Notes 📊 Once a week, we’ll share real-world insights from our work with traffic: mistakes, patterns, and unexpected issues that actually impact the stability of launches. No theory or fluff—just practical lessons from real launches. The format is simple: — observation 👀 — why it matters 🛡 — what it leads to 📉 Let’s go 🚀
❤5🔥2👏1
🤔 Why does Telegram restrict accounts even when you do not exceed the limits? Ads Approved is used when you need to work steadily with traffic: white pages, AI cloaking, launches in different verticals. Telegram in this setup is a separate traffic source and a set of scenarios: traffic can be driven through internal ads, through ads in other channels, and even when sending traffic from other sources with warm-up in…
👍4👌2🔥1
🚀 Why do some campaigns scale smoothly while others face constant rejections and bans? 🔥 Yes, solutions like Ads Approved really help with passing moderation: they provide high-quality white pages, use AI cloaking, and allow you to launch across different verticals without unnecessary friction The foundation is your IP and environment. If your proxies are weak, platforms detect it quickly — and that’s when rejectio…
❤5👍2🔥1
🤖 CaptchaAI — Dominate Every CAPTCHA with AI Power 💎 The Ultimate AI-Powered CAPTCHA Solving Solution ⚡ Lightning-Fast 💰 Market-Lowest Pricing ♾ Unlimited Solves 🔥 Exclusive Deal for Ads-Approved Users 🎁 100 FREE CAPTCHA-Solving Threads — 1 Full Day 💸 + 15% OFF Any Plan No limits. No delays. Just pure solving power. 🚀 Solve Every CAPTCHA Without Limits ✔ reCAPTCHA v2 ✔ reCAPTCHA v2 Enterprise ✔ reCAPTCHA v…
🔥5👍1🥰1
White pages are the foundation. But what are you building on top of them? Affiliate marketers often obsess over the technical side: how to bypass moderation and which white page to use. That’s the baseline—without it, you can't even launch. But passing moderation is only 50% of the battle. The other 50% is exactly what the user sees after they click. To stop burning your testing budget and start seeing results, pro…
🔥2👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ads_approved_channel_en. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ads Approved EN” (@ads_approved_channel_en), 835 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ads_approved_channel_en.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.