Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for أَديـب الحـداد!♡

Channel

أَديـب الحـداد!♡

@adrb23

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

322subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 28 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001631106519
TypeChannel
Username@adrb23
Descriptionأنا وقلمي من أدوات هذا الحزن ضدّ العالم.!! أديـب. https://www.instagram.com/r1ob2rt https://x.com/AdeebALHaddad1 @Adeeb455bot
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded28 September 2026
Last confirmed live28 September 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/adrb23

Growth

32228 Sept 2026, 01:47 — 322 subscribers28 Sept 2026, 02:22 — 322 subscribers28 Sept 2026, 01:4728 Sept 2026, 02:22
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 321–323 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Sept 2026, 02:22322no change
28 Sept 2026, 01:47322first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 23 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.2%
avg views ÷ 322 subscribers
Avg views / post
65.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
3.08%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 September 2026
Posts held20 (23 April 2026 – 9 September 2026)
Views total65
Reactions total2
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Sept 2026, 02:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
39
Videos
1
Links
5

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

97 reactions across 20 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💔4950.5%
❤3839.2%
🕊1010.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 97 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 April 2026 to 9 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Sept 2026, 14:07 UTC65 views2 reactionsread 28 September 2026

حين ننام، نكون بخير؛ فالنوم وحده يعرف كيف يأخذنا إلى عالمٍ أفضل.

❤1💔1

1 Aug 2026, 17:35 UTC234 views6 reactionsread 28 September 2026

عدمُ استطاعتي التحدّث معك بكلِّ تفاصيلي؛ غربة.

🕊6

21 Jul 2026, 21:50 UTC304 views7 reactionsread 28 September 2026

سامحيني... ليس لأنني أستحقُّ السماح، بل لأن الحياة من دون رضاكِ ثقيلة، ولأنني لا أريد أن يكون بيني وبينكِ جدارٌ شيدته كلماتٌ لم تُكتب كما كان ينبغي لها أن تُكتب.

💔5❤2

21 Jul 2026, 21:47 UTC301 views4 reactionsread 28 September 2026

وفي النهاية... إن كان لا بد أن أُحاسَب على شيء، فحاسبيني على سوء تعبيري، لا على مقدار حبي. وإن كان لا بد أن تغفري، فاغفري لذلك القلب الذي لم يعرف يومًا كيف يبوح بألمه دون أن يجرح من يحب.

💔4

21 Jul 2026, 21:45 UTC284 views4 reactionsread 28 September 2026

ستجدين رجلًا لا يزال يحبكِ كما أحبكِ في أول لحظة، وربما أكثر. رجلًا يتعثر أحيانًا في التعبير، لكنه لا يتعثر أبدًا في حبكِ. رجلًا تخونه الكلمات كلما حاول أن يصف مكانتكِ، فيبدو باردًا وهو يغلي شوقًا، ويبدو قويًا وهو ينهار خوفًا من خسارتكِ.

💔4

21 Jul 2026, 21:44 UTC265 views4 reactionsread 28 September 2026

. . أعتذر لأنني جعلتُ عينيكِ تمتلئان بالقلق بدلًا من الطمأنينة، ولأنني حمَّلتُ قلبكِ ما كان ينبغي أن أحمله وحدي، ولأنني نسيتُ أن الحب لا يحتاج إلى كلماتٍ موجعة ليُثبت صدقه. أعلم أن الاعتذار لا يمحو أثر الكلمات، وأن بعض الجروح لا تلتئم بمجرد قول: «آسف». لكنني أرجوكِ أن تنظري إلى قلبي قبل أن تنظري إلى رسالتي، فهناك ستجدين الحقيقة كلَّها.

💔4

21 Jul 2026, 21:41 UTC233 views4 reactionsread 28 September 2026

صدقيني... لو كان في الدنيا شخصٌ أخاف أن أؤذيه، فهو أنتِ. ولو كان هناك قلبٌ أرتجف من فكرة أن ينكسر بسببي، فهو قلبُكِ. ولو كان هناك إنسانٌ أرجو أن يسامحني قبل أن يسامحني العالم كلُّه، فهو أنتِ.

💔4

21 Jul 2026, 21:39 UTC231 views4 reactionsread 28 September 2026

أخطأتُ حين تركتُ حزني يتحدث بدلًا مني، وحين تركتُ الكلمات تخرج قبل أن أشرح لك أن كلَّ ما في الأمر لم يكن إلا لحظةَ ضعف، لا حقيقةَ مشاعري نحوك. نسيتُ أن أكثر القلوب حبًّا هي أكثرها خوفًا، وأن قلبك سيقرأ وجعي على أنه ابتعاد، وسيقرأ صمتي على أنه يأس، وسيقرأ كلماتي وكأنها وداع... وما كانت يومًا كذلك.

💔4

21 Jul 2026, 21:35 UTC206 views4 reactionsread 28 September 2026

. . ما أردتُ يومًا أن تكوني شاهدةً على انكساري، ولا أن أجعلك تقرئين من بين السطور أن حبَّك لم يعد يكفيني، أو أن وجودك لم يعد يخفف عني. بل على العكس... لو تعلمين كم مرةٍ أنقذني صوتُك، وكم مرةٍ أعادني حديثُك إلى الحياة، وكم مرةٍ كنتِ النورَ الوحيد في أيامٍ كانت كلها عتمة.

💔4

21 Jul 2026, 21:32 UTC178 views5 reactionsread 28 September 2026

. . لم أكتب ذلك النص لأدفعك بعيدًا عني، ولا لأحمّلك ثقلًا ليس لك، ولا لأجعل قلبك يبيت مثقلًا بالحزن بسببي. كتبته لأن الكلمات كانت أضعف من أن تحتمل ما في صدري، فخرجت مشوَّهة، قاسية، وظالمة... ظلمتني، وربما ظلمتك أكثر.

💔5

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @adrb23. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

#الشاعر_معاذ_الجنيد
@MuathAlgonaid · 20,326
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 28 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“أَديـب الحـداد!♡” (@adrb23), 322 subscribers as measured 28 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/adrb23.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.