Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
7 measurements spanning 36 days, net +58. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 260–336 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Sept 2026, 20:55
327
+17
8 Sept 2026, 22:41
310
+4
31 Aug 2026, 15:34
306
+4
25 Aug 2026, 10:14
302
+18
18 Aug 2026, 07:42
284
+15
12 Aug 2026, 05:04
269
no change
11 Aug 2026, 19:01
269
first reading
Engagement
7 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3s
Average length
3s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
979 reactions across 7 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5389081571519148145
244
24.9%
custom 5269736911538257896
229
23.4%
custom 5388703799080687370
126
12.9%
custom 5388854926094937297
82
8.38%
custom 5388865186771808270
76
7.76%
custom 5388827270800514602
69
7.05%
custom 5388830822738469999
50
5.11%
custom 5416032744704602057
49
5.01%
custom 5391323763490984860
46
4.70%
custom 5388941426736276674
8
0.817%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 979 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
62
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 7 we hold a reading for · 43%
Most on one post
60
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @adorangelus. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 7 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🤩
TELL US, ANGEL ! 🗯🪽
адора, я хочу у вас спросить можно ли взять вашу внешность (ваши фотографии) для презентации одного персонажа? я ищу актрису для своей короткометражки, вы идеально подходите, но я нахожусь сейчас в германии 😭 или если вы вдруг будете проезжать европу в 2027 году мы можем с вами пересечься? умоляю🧎🏽
💭🦄 @ adora ; yes AND YES! планов на 2027 много, поэтому я буду рада это все о…
🤩
ангелы, я скоро выложу обновленные анкеты своих nn ребят 😇 шанс для всех, кто new here познакомиться с моими персонажами🥹моей вселенной 🩷🧩🩰🤩 (#nnbyadora)
🤩
👱♀️ adora 🪽 angelus — THE muse and THE artist, model, writer of her own universe ( #nnbyadora ), real life caitlyn kiramman, tarot reader🥹a mystical soul 💎
aquarius ♒️ sun, leo ♌️ moon, pisces ♓️ rising & venus ♾️
🤍👱♀️ 🤩 I AM the ART director of my own life🥹блог о жизни музы🥹творца в одном лице🥹тут много меня 🌟 моего творчества (nn, arts, makeup, fashion smt) ; fandom stuff ofc 🦄 🩵👱♀️
🦄🥹🥹yes, i’m a fandom per…
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @adorangelus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“adorangelus” (@adorangelus), 327 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/adorangelus.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
