Я вообще не дизайнер (и не футболист), но задизайнил чемпионат по подземному катанию в Москве 🚇
🔥15👍4🤡3💩1
Signed Sergey Turulin

Channel
@adobescript
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
499subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001070490450 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @adobescript |
| Created | Between 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/adobescript |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:24 | 499 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:19 | 499 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 22 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
76 reactions across 6 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 43 | 56.6% | |
| 👍 | 17 | 22.4% | |
| 💯 | 9 | 11.8% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 3.95% | |
| 🤡 | 3 | 3.95% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 1.32% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 76reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 22 February 2026 to 8 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Я вообще не дизайнер (и не футболист), но задизайнил чемпионат по подземному катанию в Москве 🚇
🔥15👍4🤡3💩1
Signed Sergey Turulin
👆 начинаем постить про редактор генераторов Этот указатель для Екатеринбурга раньше делался пару дней, а теперь — минуты. И сразу доступно пакетное создание из гугл-таблицы или эксель-файла: https://t.me/anycrafttech/105 В следующих сериях расскажем про многостраничники и условные шаблоны (это когда при разных ситуациях делаются разные макеты)
🔥3❤2👍2
Signed Sergey Turulin
Визуальный редактор генераторов Готовимся к новому этапу автоматизации дизайна — визуальном редактору генераторов. Скоро любой человек сможет превратить свой шаблон в онлайн-конструктор, чтобы создавать макет для печати быстро, без рутины, ошибок, гайдов, адоба и фигмы. Рассказали в небольшом скринкасте, как уже сейчас без кода создавать генераторы для простых шаблонов: https://youtu.be/E2bldsZRH3k Функциональност…
👍4🔥3
Signed Sergey Turulin
Какой проект опубликовать?
The shares total 165%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Signed Sergey Turulin
Сгенерил новый квартал схемы и сделал тёмную тему. Как вам? Любителям Выхина (есть такие?) сделал отдельный слайд.
🔥8👍7
Signed Sergey Turulin
Как же жалко выглядят эти сообщения об отказе от рассылки. Отказываешься, отказываешься, а у них всё другие рассылки, другие. Ещё бы предложили «Отписаться от этого письма» и получили бы главный приз.
💯9
Signed Sergey Turulin
Дайджест моего канальчика про всякое. Сам канальчик тут: @turulin_log
Signed Sergey Turulin
А вот и сам процесс создания генератора и первые скрины интерфейса: 1. добавляем тексты и картинки, двигаем их на макете (шифт и альт работают для перемещения и копирования), делаем группы и настраиваем автолейаут; 2. включаем сразу несколько данных для превью, чтобы видеть вариации; 3. кликаем галочку «Публичный генератор» и можно пользоваться без регистрации и смс; 4. делаем таблицу (эксель/csv/гугл-таблицу) с коло…
🔥14❤1
Signed Sergey Turulin
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @adobescript. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какой проект опубликовать?
The shares total 165%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 22 February 2026 to 8 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 335,563 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Сергей Турулин” (@adobescript), 499 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/adobescript.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.