Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Andrichi | in.crypt

Channel

Andrichi | in.crypt

@adnrichi

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

725subscribers

-16 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003334217080
TypeChannel
Username@adnrichi
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 2 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live23 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 23 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/adnrichi

Growth

7257417337 August 2026 — 741 subscribers8 August 2026 — 741 subscribers8 August 2026 — 739 subscribers15 August 2026 — 733 subscribers23 August 2026 — 725 subscribers7 August 202623 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 16 days, net -16. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 723–743 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
23 Aug 2026, 10:56725-8
15 Aug 2026, 16:35733-6
8 Aug 2026, 14:26739-2
8 Aug 2026, 02:02741no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:18741first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 2 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

232 reactions across 19 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 542497247002310408912252.6%
custom 593168772085318591010444.8%
custom 593131396850412052062.59%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 232reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 March 2026 to 16 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Mar 2026, 18:55 UTC548 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ну в целом все как и говорил.. 🔥 Закреп за уровень 71300$ , выход из ренжа с дальнейшим движением вверх. 🏎 Сегодня уже коснулись зоны 74500$. Думаю если рыночное настроение не поменяется то мы уверенно дойдем до 0.5 по Фибоначчи (79k$)... 👍

custom 59313139685041205205custom 59316877208531859104

15 Mar 2026, 17:10 UTC567 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Всем привет, друзья.👋 С последнего обзора по BTC мало что изменилось, за исключением одного момента, о котором, собственно, и хотел рассказать.✈️ Ценовое движение всё так же находится на хаях 4-ч ренджа. С момента последней манипуляции с выходом к 73 800$ я ожидал более глубокой коррекции под откуп, но движение всё ещё борется за выход из ренджа.🏎 В общем, к чему я это всё. Думаю, если мы словим закреп за уровнем

custom 59316877208531859106custom 59313139685041205201

13 Mar 2026, 20:44 UTC382 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Чет смотрю по коментариям у нас не густо .. 🤔 Ну значит буду делать как чувствую…👍 Всех обнял.❤️‍🔥

custom 54249724700231040899custom 59316877208531859103

13 Mar 2026, 16:42 UTC347 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 54249724700231040896

12 Mar 2026, 14:30 UTC327 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Друзья , так и не услышал вашу обратную связь по поводу обучения.. 👀 Делать еще подобного рода моменты ?🤔 Жду ваше мнение в комментария…🌚

custom 593168772085318591013

11 Mar 2026, 14:45 UTC281 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Всем привет, друзья..👋 Что у нас по актуальному… Новости за последние сутки не добавили оптимизма, на фоне чего BTC сходил к отметке 68k$. ⬇️ Минирование Ормузского пролива и нападение на грузовое судно не звучат многообещающе…🙄 Я также придерживаюсь своего плана и жду более глубокой коррекции для откупа...👍

custom 59316877208531859105custom 54249724700231040893

10 Mar 2026, 21:37 UTC279 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

BTC 4H Так-так… Не сказать, что график похож на один из шедевров Пикассо, но зато информативно.👍 В общем, что у нас тут. На 4ч образовался плотный рендж, который торгуется уже достаточно продолжительное время.🧐 Байты на выходы вверх уже были, и думаю, там нормально побрили лонгистов. Не исключаю вторую попытку той же манипуляции, поэтому заходить по маркету не советую.⚔️ Тем более что мы находимся на верхних гран

custom 59316877208531859107custom 54249724700231040893

10 Mar 2026, 21:13 UTC238 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 54249724700231040896

10 Mar 2026, 17:07 UTC237 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 54249724700231040897

9 Mar 2026, 14:04 UTC248 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Друзья есть вопрос…🥸

  1. Добавлять больше лайф контента ?😝64%
  2. Нет , давай только крипту.. 🏎36%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8 Mar 2026, 12:21 UTC266 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Всех с праздником дамы…🌹

custom 593168772085318591010

6 Mar 2026, 15:01 UTC362 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

Ловите, друзья…🔥🔥🔥 В этом кратком обучении я подобрал и разобрал исключительно важные и рабочие графические паттерны, которые помогают определить ценовое движение практически на любых таймфреймах…💯 Как вы заметили, я сам частенько использую их в своих анализах и думаю, что, отталкиваясь от опросника, это обучение подойдет каждому.👍 Так что дерзайте, друзья, жду ваш фидбек в комментариях или реакциях под постом…🔥

custom 593168772085318591010custom 54249724700231040895

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @adnrichi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

9 Mar 2026, 14:04 UTCAnonymous Poll39 voters

Друзья есть вопрос…🥸

  1. Добавлять больше лайф контента ?😝64%
  2. Нет , давай только крипту.. 🏎36%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 March 2026 to 16 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Andrichi | in.crypt” (@adnrichi), 725 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/adnrichi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.