5 measurements spanning 21 days, net -8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 178–188 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
30 Aug 2026, 10:55
179
-2
23 Aug 2026, 23:56
181
-3
16 Aug 2026, 18:27
184
-2
10 Aug 2026, 01:42
186
-1
9 Aug 2026, 05:46
187
first reading
Engagement
6 posts held, back to 23 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3m 44s
Average length
45s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
156 reactions across 6 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
77
49.4%
custom 5224687691060233564
17
10.9%
🔥
15
9.62%
custom 5465158902758776731
13
8.33%
custom 5787253416707231320
9
5.77%
custom 4902466110504308962
7
4.49%
custom 4936285868403983381
7
4.49%
🤣
6
3.85%
custom 5787269728993022231
4
2.56%
custom 5787326688849300783
1
0.641%
Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 156reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 23 December 2025 to 23 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
93
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 6 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
33
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @admiraltyche. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 6 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 December 2025 to 23 February 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Так сложилось, что у нас в семье абсолютное большинство - это всевозможные защитники и офицеры, да и сама я офицер ведь бывших не бывает ☕️ Профиль у всех, конечно, свой, но суть одна - с нашим днём, товарищи! С днём Защитника Отечества!
Всех причастных Мирослава поздравляет тортиком собственного производства 🩷
P.S. устами дочери: кот охраняет нас от привидений - значит, достоин быть лицом праздничного торта 🫳
А с…
❤️ А пока мы с Мирошкой-крошкой стоим в традиционной пятничной пробке, хочу отметить этот день как свой первый эмансипированный опыт абсолютно самостоятельной и независимой уборки целой тонны снега. Спасибо, это было незабываемо
То чувство, когда педагог по балету пишет тебе с предложением поставить Мирославе соло "Бабочка", а ты в этот момент слышишь в телефонном разговоре с дочерью, как она уточняет у друзей, что за бой им предстоит: танковый или корабельный 🫠
Как сказала Mama Drama, тут больше полет шмеля зайдет 🐝
"Поиграться хотела", или шесть часов конкурса - предел только для родителей,
21.12.2025
Ну что: привет, vpn! 10 декабря весь мир узнал о моей любви к блюдам из яиц - 10 февраля наши власти начали замедлять телегу 😦 Самое время запостить видосик!
Период, когда Мирослава с ума сходила по Эльзе и Моане и мы заодно, закончился на одном из саундтреков мультфильма "Kейпоп-охотницы на демонов" -
🙂🙂, т.е. сначала дочь услы…
Шел9⃣день января 😆😆😆
Мы не пропали - мы у прабабушек и бабушек: уничтожаем еду, паримся в банях, колядуем, окультуриваемся в местном ДК, играем в имаджинариум и катаемся на коньках по родственникам
А ещё мы оказались в числе тех самых 🤪, кто хотел скоротать время в кино, а по итогу посмотрел отечественный Буратино за триллион рублей
Слушайте, я такой вкусный рамен не ела уже очень давно
📍 "Вольность" на Ленинском проспекте, уютная и камерная
Случайные места, бывает, в самое сердце попадают 🩷
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @admiraltyche. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 690,380 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“True funs or fans” (@admiraltyche), 179 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/admiraltyche.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
