🍄 RT BEBOLA CHROME 🍄 💐 3.93g 18cm 0.25cm 🔑 booking depo ROSE
Signed Nor Aziantie Azhar

Channel
@adekberadekgoldjewels
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
18subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001074413275 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @adekberadekgoldjewels |
| Created | Between 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/adekberadekgoldjewels |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:17 | 18 | -1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:26 | 19 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:31 | 19 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 11 November 2019 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 December 2019. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
🍄 RT BEBOLA CHROME 🍄 💐 3.93g 18cm 0.25cm 🔑 booking depo ROSE
Signed Nor Aziantie Azhar
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed Nor Aziantie Azhar
🍄 LOKET LOVE STAR 🍄 💐 0.62g ❌ Angah 10/12 RM140
Signed Nor Aziantie Azhar
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed Nor Aziantie Azhar
🍄 RT BELUT PADU 🍄 💐 1.23g 17.5cm 0.1cm ❌ wali
Signed moe aizat
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed moe aizat
🍄 RT BELUT PADU LOCENG 🍄 💐 2.10g 17cm 0.1cm ❌ kak noor masliza
Signed moe aizat
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed moe aizat
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed Nor Aziantie Azhar
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed Nor Aziantie Azhar
Sebarang pertanyaan dan lock pm admin👇 ADMIN 1 👉 @Yantiemiss92 ADMIN 2 👉 @Alyayaiii94 ADMIN 3 👉 @Moeaizat Untuk fast respon😍: Boleh whatsapp terus: www.wasap.my/60172596992 yantie www.wasap.my/60126952585 aizat www.wasap.my/60167879886 leya Semua item adalah readystokkk .. Lock hanya 24JAM shj ‼️ Lebih dikira lock batal ❌ Harap joylocker tidak wujud 😏
Signed Nor Aziantie Azhar
🍄 RL BELUT PADU 🍄 💐 2.50g 44cm 0.1cm ❌ Cikgu atie 11/11
Signed Nor Aziantie Azhar
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @adekberadekgoldjewels. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@adekberadekgoldjewels named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BK EMAS 13 ADEK BERADEK RM207/G” (@adekberadekgoldjewels), 18 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/adekberadekgoldjewels.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.