Channel
@adamcpa
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
161subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002260259906 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @adamcpa |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/adamcpa |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 04:44 | 161 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 17:00 | 162 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:57 | 162 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 21 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
34 reactions across 15 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 19 | 55.9% | |
| 🥰 | 7 | 20.6% | |
| 🤬 | 3 | 8.82% | |
| custom 5352566601382109671 | 2 | 5.88% | |
| custom 5404529538090672257 | 1 | 2.94% | |
| custom 5404591140806598373 | 1 | 2.94% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 2.94% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 34reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 October 2025 to 21 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Реддитологам привет, хочу передать вам подарочек от моего приятеля ❤️ @maerkatobot — бесплатный чекер аккаунтов и проверка требований кармы, возраста аккаунта и требования верификации сабреддита (также показываются правила и описание прямо в боте) Пользуйтесь <3
Очень заболел на 12 дней, вылетел со всех работ полностью(из жизни тоже). Благо все работало без меня, и деньги шли неплохо(из них конечно 0 моих, я то ниче не сделал), но у меня появилось желание сделать вам пост. Про топ 3 ошибки могу написать, но честно как будто мне это не интересно, по этому внизу в комментах можете написать свои идеи про что хотели бы почитать. Если ничего не будет, то напишу про топ 3 ошибки…
❤3🤬3
Утром снега было 0
Video message, posted without a caption
Чужая всегда красивее своей, да? 🤩 Ну вот всегда, в любой соц. сети, глядя на другие страницы, я вижу воронки лучше чем у меня. Только вот я этому не расстраиваюсь. Наоборот, я как эстет - вижу куда расти визуально, и понимаю что обычный человек тоже поведется на визуал и расположение офера, просто он не дает себе в этом отчёт 📚 Но как-то же эти все люди додумываются до конвертящих воронок, да? 🌟 Тут как раз и н…
❤1
Ребят, вы не поняли, сегодня будет пост про ворнки
🥰2❤1
Уберите голоса за первую тему, я уже написал про воронки😡
❤1
Тема new поста? 🤩
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤3
REBRANDING Уже был пост о том что purity больше нет, так что не вижу смысла расписывать всё заново, просто не пугайтесь "непонятному" каналу у вас в тг, я всё еще Адам👤 Пока мы строим команду по AI моделям, предлагаю вам посетить мою доску для AI OFM: https://t.me/+j-fTgfz3mxpkM2Rk 👁 Так же у нас всё ещё есть чат по Reddit'у
❤3
Сегодня хочу записать небольшое гс с описанием проблем с которыми мы столкнулись, что бы обезопасить вас в будущем, если вы собираетесь врываться в AI OFM🤩
❤2
PURITY БОЛЬШЕ НЕ СУЩЕСТВУЕТ 👅 Несколько месяцев назад я принял решение уйти с Reddit и полностью перейти в оффлайн-бизнес. Это было тяжело,но я не жалею ни секунды. То время дало мне пространство, которого раньше не хватало, чтобы честно спросить себя: а чего я вообще хочу дальше? 🤩Сейчас ответ звучит так: оффлайн тоже выматывает. Деньги хорошие, но это уже не то, ради чего хочется вставать утром. Поэтому я остаюсь…
❤3👍1🥰1
УСТАЛ РАБОТАТЬ ЧАТТЕРОМ🚬 ? РЕШЕНИЕ ↓ Я занимаюсь Reddit-трафиком и запускаю менторство в формате созвонов 🏃 Формат живого общения и разбор твоей ситуации, а не абстрактные примеры 🤝 На созвонах: Разбираем Reddit как платформу и правильное построение работы Где брать аккаунты и прокси под работу Как составлять контент планы грамотно Разбираем, как набрать первые кейсы и опыт Учу составлять договоры так, чтобы …
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @adamcpa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Тема new поста? 🤩
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 October 2025 to 21 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“adamion OFM” (@adamcpa), 161 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/adamcpa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.