3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 608–615 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 16:47
609
-5
6 Aug 2026, 17:46
614
no change
6 Aug 2026, 13:33
614
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.96%
avg views ÷ 609 subscribers
Avg views / post
54.5
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.19%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held
20 (4 August 2026 – 6 August 2026)
Views total
1,091
Reactions total
18
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Aug 2026, 17:46 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
18 reactions across 10 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
5
27.8%
👏
4
22.2%
👌
3
16.7%
👍
2
11.1%
💔
2
11.1%
👎
1
5.56%
😡
1
5.56%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
بی اعتنایی در برابر آنچه میگذرد جنایت است.
هیچکس نمیتواند بیطرف باشد. در جامعهی ظالم هیچکس بیگناه نیست. سکوت به خودی خود تشویق به ادامه ظلم و درنتیجه، دست داشتن نامستقیم در ارتکاب جنایت است.
«بیطرف»ها با سکوتشان ظالم را تشویق میکنند. آنها فقط وقتی صدایشان در میآید که مصالحشان مستقیما درخطر بیفتد و این سکوت نوعی همدستی ضمنی و معاهدهی «حسن همجواری» است میان ظالم با کسی که به او هنوز ظلمی نشده یا ظلم کمتری…
مغز اجتماعی:
چرا مغز انسان به ارتباط، حمایت و همدلی با دیگران نیاز دارد؟
در دنیای امروز، فردگرایی بیش از گذشته رواج یافته و بسیاری از افراد، ناخواسته، ارتباطات عمیق انسانی را از دست دادهاند. در حالی که استقلال ارزشمند است، انزوای طولانیمدت میتواند بر عملکرد مغز و سلامت روان تأثیر منفی بگذارد.
مغز انسان برای ارتباط ساخته شده است. روابط صمیمانه و احساس تعلق، با افزایش ترشح موادی مانند اکسیتوسین، دوپامین و سروتونی…
#عشق_ورزي مردهاي ايراني
قبل از عید داشتم کتابهای کتابخانۀ کوچکمان را گردگیری میکردم. طبق معمول هر کتاب را برمیداشتم؛ عنوان آن را نگاه میکردم؛ چند صفحه نخست آنرا ورق میزدم و بعد با دستمال تمیزش میکردم.
توجه ام به جملههای "تقدیم و تشکّری" جلب شد که نویسندگان در صفحات نخست کتابها نوشته بودند. احساس کردم به تدریج دارم قاعدهای کشف میکنم. حداقل در کتاب های کتابخانۀ من اینطور بود.
نویسندگانی که زن بودند بهن…
دیدگاه گور خری در روانشناسی یعنی آدمها را مجموعه ای از ویژگیهای بد و خوب بدانیم،
هیچکس بد مطلق و یا خوب مطلق نیست
باهم بودن را بیاموزیم نه دربرابر هم بودن ما در حدی نیستیم که راجع به کسی قضاوت کنیم.
از گورخری پرسیدم :
تو سفیدی، راه راه سیاه داری یا اینکه سیاهی، راه راه سفید داری؟
گورخر به جای جواب دادن پرسید :
تو خوبی فقط عادت های بد داری ،
یا بدی و چندتا عادت خوب داری؟!
ساکتی بعضی وقت ها شلوغ میکنی،
یا شیطونی و…
۱۴ مرداد ۱۲۸۵ #روز_صدور_فرمان_مشروطیت است. مظفرالدین شاه با امضای این فرمان در جریان جنبش مشروطهخواهی، با تشکیل #مجلس_شورای_ملی موافقت کرد و به این ترتیب حکومت ایران به #مشروطه_سلطنتی تبدیل شد.
کانال صدای امید
تبریز ؛ نام بلند آسمان آبی ایران
۱۴ مرداد روز تبریز است
تبریز شهر نخستینها و شهر عشق و حضور
شهر کشف و شهود و رندی...
شهرِ شاعران و شهریاران
شهر صنعتِ بیمرگ ایرانی: شهر نابها و خلوص: فرشهای دستباف چلهابریشمین
و شهر سالم و امن و همهی خوبیهای آرزو ماندهی جهان.
شهر زنان فریبای و مردانِ تندمزاجِ دیوانهخو
میگویند تولستوی آرزو داشت تبریزی میبود!
و آرزو داشت ایرانی میبود
و خوب، تبریز ما، مهد زیباترینهای ایران…
🌱🌿
یک روز از پدرم پرسیدم فرق بین عشق و ازدواج چیست؟
روز بعد او کتابی قدیمی آورد و به من گفت این برای توست. با تعجب گفتم : اما این کتاب خیلی با ارزش است، تشکر کردم و در حالیکه خیلی ذوق داشتم تصمیم گرفتم کتاب را جایی دنج بگذارم تا سر فرصت بخوانم.
چند روز بعد پدرم روزنامه ای را آورد، نگاهی به آن انداختم و بنظرم جالب آمد که پدرم گفت این روزنامه مال تو نیست، برای شخص دیگریست و موقتا میتوانی آن را داشته باشی، من هم با عج…
" عشق " هدیهای نمیدهد
مگر از گوهرِ ذاتِ خویش.
و هدیهای نمیپذیرد،
مگر از گوهرِ ذاتِ خویش.
" عشق " نَه مالک است و نَه مَملوک،
زیرا " عشق "
برای " عشق " کافی است ...
وقتی که عاشق میشَوید
مگویید :
" خداوند در قلبِ من است " ،
بلکه بگویید :
" من در قلبِ خداوند جای دارم. "
و گمان مَکنید که زمامِ عشق
در دَستِ شماست،
بلکه این عشق است
که اگر شما را شایسته بیند
حرکتِ شما را هدایت میکند ...
#جبران_خلیل_جبر…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @adabiyat_va. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,473,401 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ادبیات و...” (@adabiyat_va), 609 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/adabiyat_va.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.