Channel
@ad_factum
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,344subscribers
+57 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001593025945 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ad_factum |
| Created | 26 April 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ad_factum |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:37 | 2,344 | +23 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:58 | 2,321 | +29 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:10 | 2,292 | +5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:02 | 2,287 | first reading |
27 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 27 (5 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 20,485 |
| Reactions total | 719 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 16:42 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
719 reactions across 27 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5276379787131117640 | 405 | 56.3% | |
| custom 5330039467849853344 | 184 | 25.6% | |
| custom 5330190998591023105 | 130 | 18.1% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 719reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ad_factum. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 27 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Я всемирный космополит: Еврейская мудрость, немецкая педантичность, испанский стыд, русская тоска, английская капитальность, французская элегантность, надёжность швейцарских часов, китайская продуктивность, японская суицидальность, американская свободолюбивость, антарктическое хладноумие и африканская горячечность
custom 527637978713111764014custom 53300394678498533444custom 53301909985910231054
С подсолнухами всё в порядке, кому было интересно Я не столь жесток, чтобы оставлять их гнить на Невском 😭
custom 533019099859102310510custom 52763797871311176406custom 53300394678498533443
Депрессия и мания — это декомпенсаторные механизмы, а не заболевания. Защитный кокон, формирующийся когда ты устал от несправедливости и тщетности бытия. Психиатр и психотерапевт могут объяснить тебе на вербальном уровне что твоя острая сенситивность к миру — это чрезмерно, могут помочь тебе имитировать психокинезис «здорового» человека, но в сущности ты с этим рождаешься; это и дар, и проклятие, этому нельзя научить…
custom 527637978713111764011custom 53300394678498533444custom 53301909985910231052
Также микролемма, мимовердикт: в дейтингах основная масса людей — неудачники, те кто ищут лёгкого секса, девушки, ищущие папика(тарелочницы), а также неудачники и неудачницы, не вписывающиеся в первые две категории или из-за некрасивой внешности, или из-за аутизма и иных психопроблем. Это цитадель поломанных душ, крепость-тюрьма нереализованных грёз. Мнения я своего не сменил: хотите кого-то вашего уровня, идите ту…
custom 52763797871311176408custom 53301909985910231054custom 53300394678498533443
Чтобы не быть голословным и не играть в тренера, вчера залез в дейтинги. Ещё провожу эксперименты. Пока меня поразило только одно. Отчего что у мужчин, что у женщин предельно идентичные интересы: играю на гитаре, рэпер(ша), читаю мангу, смотрю аниме, люблю путешествовать-гулять, рисую(порисульки), слушаю музыку, творческая личность(то есть ничего не умею, любите меня пер се), играю в (длинный список видеоигр). Если…
custom 52763797871311176406custom 53300394678498533445custom 53301909985910231053
Сегодня долгожданный стрим в 21:30 МСК. Расскажу как в Яндексе Алису делают, как Савватан в лагере Эпштейна бывал, немного о Достоевском(«дурная бесконечность и полифония»). В остальном поотвечаю на вопросы, поговорим, затем пойдём смотреть заказанные вами видосы! P.S: Перельман будет, но чуть позже. Возникли небольшие проблемы с получением диссертации, но всё наладилось вчера, я пока не успел прочитать и разобратьс…
custom 52763797871311176408custom 53300394678498533442custom 53301909985910231052
Осталось пять браслетов! 😈😈
custom 52763797871311176406custom 53301909985910231053custom 53300394678498533442
Ладно, вкину ещё прикол с кафедры теорвера и матстата: Ходите по улицам и предлагайте девушкам загадать одно число от нуля до ста. Затем называйте случайное число, которое пришло вам в голову — вероятность угадать 1/100. Значит одна из сотки девушек точно впечатлится. Дальше уже дело это внимание не потерять
custom 527637978713111764025custom 53300394678498533445custom 53301909985910231055
Хорошо, если сделаете 150 сердечек, снимаю "Как математика поможет тебе найти девушку?". Пошаримся в теории вероятностей и мат.стате дейтинг-приложений. Сегодня в чате платных подписчиков обсуждали. Небольшой спойлер: поиск девушки — это модифицированная задача о беспорядке; вероятность успеха(та самая на всю жизнь любовь) если пропустить первые семь-восемь, примерно 1/e ~ 36.6%. Аналогичную стратегию используют HR,…
custom 527637978713111764029custom 53301909985910231055custom 53300394678498533443
Сто сердечек и возвращаюсь в математику
custom 5276379787131117640152custom 53300394678498533449custom 53301909985910231056
Курение вредит вашему здоровью, но почему никто не говорит, что без курения можно сойти с ума?
custom 527637978713111764010custom 53300394678498533443custom 53301909985910231053
Осталось семь браслетов 😈
custom 52763797871311176405custom 53301909985910231054custom 53300394678498533442
Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @ad_factum. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 262,987 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“blablabla” (@ad_factum), 2,344 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ad_factum.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.