Channel
@ad9698
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
241subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002774152335 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ad9698 |
| Description | 霸凌_灌醉搭讪_洗澡_偷窃_校园暴力_女生打架 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 13 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ad9698 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:32 | 241 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:04 | 241 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 13 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 8 (13 September 2025 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 581 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 02:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
20 reactions across 5 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 20 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 13 September 2025 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
来自速搜推荐 @SSOU 📢欧博代理 欧博私网 亚星... 📢🍑宝捡漏频道😍😍�... 📢西安全城洗浴安排🛁 📢少年 📢UG环球平台 UG环球真... 📢月诗 📢依依不舍 📢渗透-品茶-赌场-欧易-... 📢影视剪辑|无缝衔接|治愈... 📢欧博官网|亚星官网|皇冠... 📢【青云】灰产项目话费 电... 📢欧博官方 亚星官方 欧博... 📢圣经故事 返璞归真 📢欣欣老师 📢欧美日韩无码 👉流量互推规则介绍💥 以下是广告推荐 ✅东南亚大事件✅柬埔寨大事件✅东南亚新闻 📢 X-panel 一站式拉人增粉平台 📢⚽️爱博体育-佣金55%-玩家首存即升VIP7等级⚽️ 📢⚽️注册送138🧧百家乐/棋牌/电竞体育信誉平台 ✅【铂莱娱乐bolai.com】8年老台 世界杯指定投注平台 全网上押1300万u 🇨🇳 简体中文包 —————————-- 🔥将 @TonGroupHelpBot 设置为频道管理员，即可在2000+频道进行互
来自速搜推荐 @SSOU 📢SunPorno 📢恐怖异事|悬疑传说|民间... 📢国际外呼线路 外呼系统 ... 📢曼陀铃艺术之路 📢日本美女鉴赏大全|性感写... 📢彩票游戏-体育买球-棋牌... 📢SM 字母 捆绑🔞 📢搞笑综艺|running... 📢韩国赌场—新盛赌场 📢游戏赌博网站 赌球网站 ... 📢lorreAI懒懒 📢欧博代理 亚星代理 亚星... 📢世俱杯-足球-五大联赛-... 📢广州背包客—（顶级复刻表... 📢TED 👉流量互推规则介绍💥 以下是广告推荐 🥇西湖娱乐城✅老品牌包出款✅出款超10亿U 📢🅾️免费试玩✅大客必备✅注册送158🅾️ 📢💎85.CC电子百家乐0审核包出款支持汇旺提U 📢球速体育相信品牌的力量、老品牌值得信赖、不限ip、免实名。 📢XX789🔞成人资源一站式导航 🇨🇳 简体中文包 —————————-- 🔥将 @TonGroupHelpBot 设置为频道管理员，即可在2000
❤5
TG必备的搜索引擎，快搜kuai帮你精准找到，想要的群组、频道、音乐 、视频 👉 https://t.me/kuai?start=a_3HHA5Q7
TG必备的搜索引擎，快搜kuai帮你精准找到，想要的群组、频道、音乐 、视频 👉 https://t.me/kuai?start=a_3HHA5Q7
❤4
⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡🥰🥰🥰🥰 实力U盘放心赢： http://tl10270.com ⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡免实名不限地区： xs06.cc ⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡公正公平无私彩： http://xsj111.vip 邀请码：jd168 ⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡充值提款秒到账： sts66.cc 😃😃😃😃😃😃🥰😰😥😓🤗🤔🫣🤭🫡🤫🫠🤥😶😐🫤😑0️⃣1️⃣2️⃣3️⃣4️⃣5️⃣6️⃣ ☂️☔️🫧 😃😃😄😄😄😄😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃 负责专员TG电报： t.me/tlwd01 ——【@baiyjh】 客服QQ：3365708956 电/微 14736849079 😭😭😭😭 😃😊😃😃😃
❤5
真实玩家提供视频 #百家乐 #赌场 #真人 #AG技巧打法 #澳门赌场 令人震惊，专业人士在澳门赌场独占百家乐，遇到长龙路子，只跟路子不砍龙，平推技巧。 视频PG电子爆奖平台： http://xsj111.vip 邀请码：jd168 👆👆👆【更多游戏链接在置顶】👉TG: t.me/tlwd01
❤3
#AG真人视讯 #百家乐 #pg电子游戏 #体育 #彩票 #麻将糊了 #赌场 #澳门赌场 #新葡京 #金沙娱乐 #新盛赌场 娱乐开户经理qq 3365708956 金沙娱乐平台网址： http://xsj111.vip 邀请码：jd168 圣淘沙娱乐: sts66.cc 不 👇 同 👇 网 👇 站 ❤️麻豆视频 ~ ~ ~ 国产偷拍 💋 — — — — — — — — — 🔞 真人直播 ⛔️ PG电子麻将 👆 👆 👆 🔜官方频道： t.me/tlwd01
😀😃😃😃😃😃😁😁😄😆 🥰 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 🥰🥰🥰🥰 ： http://tl10270.com 主营：百家乐 --牛牛-- 龙虎-😃😃😄😄😄😄😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃玩转百余款游戏--爆奖率超高--诚信赔付 😃😃😃😃😃😃😀😃 ⚡⚡⚡⚡网址 ： xs06.cc ⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡网址 ： sts66.cc ⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡网址 ： http://xsj111.vip 邀请码：jd168 ☎️🥰🥰🥰： t.me/tlwd01 ——【@baiyjh】 客服经理热线电/微 14736849079 QQ：3365708956 充值方式便捷，支持：🥺😒😒🙁🫢😍🥰🥰😜🤓😌支付宝 ，微信红包 ，银行卡 ，USDT ，缅币kbz ，上下分，资金安全干净有保障！
❤3
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @ad9698. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 681,932 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 20 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@ad9698 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“霸凌_灌醉搭讪_洗澡_偷窃_校园暴力_女生打架” (@ad9698), 241 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ad9698.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.