Channel
@acupofme_muniranorova
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
24subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004428149537 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @acupofme_muniranorova |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 4 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 13 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/acupofme_muniranorova |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 18:04 | 24 | +1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 14:02 | 23 | -2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:04 | 25 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:31 | 25 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 4 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
12 reactions across 6 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 5 | 41.7% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 41.7% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 8.33% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 8.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🦉 Eski fransuz tilida kakku qushi "cucu" deb atalar ekan. Koʻchma maʼnoda xiyonatga uchragan erni ham anglatgan. Kakku qushuning baʼzi turlarida urgʻochi kakkular tez-tez juftini almashtirib turar ekan-da, shunga shunday deyishgan ekan. )) Ingliz tilidagi "cuckold" (xotini xiyonat qilgan er) soʻzi ham shu "cucu"dan kelib chiqqan ekan. @acupofme_muniranorova
😁1
🦉 Nick Walmsley "telbaroq/esi yoʻqroq" soʻzini ingliz tiliga "cuckoo" (oʻsha biz bilgan kakku qush) deb tarjima qilibdi. Menga juda yoqdi bu tarjima. "Cuckoo" soʻzining koʻchma maʼnosi: "esi yoʻq/gʻalatiroq/sal esdan ogʻgan". Asl matnda ona 12 yashar oʻgʻliga bir odamni tasvirlayotib "Telbaroq odam boʻlsa kerak-da," deydi. Bu holatda juda mos variant tanlangan, menimcha. Chunki onalar bolalari bilan gaplashayotgand…
#tarjima Berganning betiga qarama. "Never look a gift horse in the mouth" desa boʻlarmikan? 🤔 @acupofme_muniranorova
#tarjimonlarga "Necha yosh deb oʻylaysan (uni)?" "Necha yosh berasan (unga)?" degan gap uchun "How old do you think he is?" ning oʻrniga "How old do you take him to be?" ni ham ishlatsangiz boʻladi. take smb/smth to + verb = deb oʻylamoq, faraz qilmoq. @acupofme_muniranorova
💔 Bir insonni toshboʻron qilib oʻldirish uchun xalq qanchalik yovuz va vahshiy boʻlishi kerak?
😢1
Kitoblar oxirida shrift haqida mana shunday maʼlumotlarni qoldirishlarini yaxshi koʻraman. Bir tomondan, har bir shriftning yaratilish tarixi, uning ortida turgan insonlarni bilishga qiziqsam, boshqa tomondan uni yaratgan muallifni tilga olib, unga ehtirom koʻrsatishlarini alohida hurmat qilaman. Chunki har bir shrift ortida kimningdir yillab qilgan mehnati yotadi. Misol uchun, mana shu rasmda tilga olingan Scala shr…
❤4
💬 Shaxsiy fikrim: "Facebook"da koʻzim tushib qoldi: "The Noble Laureate Award" nomli xalqaro mukofotga arizalar qabul qilinayotgan ekan. Dunyoda taniqli va nufuzli mukofotlar nomiga juda oʻxshash nom tanlash adabiy sohada ishonchsizlik belgisi hisoblanadi. Xalqaro adabiyotda va professional muhitda oʻz oʻrniga ega boʻlishni istagan tashkilotlar/loyihalar va hokazolar, avvalo, oʻz brendi, oʻziga xos nomi va munosib n…
Ha, aytgancha, kitobini kimgadir oʻqishga berib turib, soʻng kimga berganini eslay olmaydiganlar uchun ham alohida boʻlimi bor ekan. 😅
Qay bir kuni Muhiddin kitoblarining hisobini yuritish uchun qulayroq vosita izlayotgani haqida yozib qoldi. Kimlardir Excel dasturidan foydalanar ekan, baʼzilar Telegramda kitobning nomini yozib borishini aytgan. Shu muammoga yechim sifatida biror bir ilova bormikan deb qiziqib izlab koʻrgan edim, bir emas bir nechtasi chiqib keldi. Oralaridan Handy Library nomidagisini yuklab oldim. Javoningizdagi kitoblarning ISBN …
😞 Bilaman, sen uchun parcha non qahat... Rimga nega kelding, tunislik bola? (Abdulla Oripov) @acupofme_muniranorova
❤1
🧳 Orzu qilaman: bir kun kelib bizda ham adabiy turizm paydo boʻladi, rivojlanadi. Bizning adabiyotni ham dunyo sevib oʻqiydi. Ijodkorlarimiz va ular yaratgan asar qahramonlarining izini izlab kelishadi kitobsevar sayyohlar. @acupofme_muniranorova
👍4
Qoʻshiqni tinglab koʻrishni istaganlar uchun
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @acupofme_muniranorova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“A Cup of Me” (@acupofme_muniranorova), 24 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/acupofme_muniranorova.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.