Channel
@actiqapp
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
19,319subscribers
-241 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001541069707 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @actiqapp |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/actiqapp |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 05:16 | 19,319 | -40 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 18:33 | 19,359 | -29 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 17:04 | 19,388 | -34 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:07 | 19,422 | -21 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:02 | 19,443 | -32 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:20 | 19,475 | -30 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:53 | 19,505 | -47 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:12 | 19,552 | -8 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:07 | 19,560 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:21 | 19,560 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 6 August 2024 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
9,286 reactions across 20 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 15.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 1,405 | 15.1% | |
| 👍 | 1,341 | 14.4% | |
| 🥰 | 1,322 | 14.2% | |
| ❤ | 1,293 | 13.9% | |
| 🎉 | 1,255 | 13.5% | |
| 🤩 | 1,207 | 13.0% | |
| 👏 | 1,183 | 12.7% | |
| ❤🔥 | 94 | 1.01% | |
| 😍 | 88 | 0.948% | |
| 💯 | 81 | 0.872% | |
| ☃ | 4 | 0.043% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 0.032% | |
| 🏆 | 2 | 0.022% | |
| 🐳 | 2 | 0.022% | |
| 👨💻 | 2 | 0.022% | |
| 🤡 | 2 | 0.022% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.011% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.011% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,286reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2024 to 2 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A year to stop second-guessing and start moving. We're building Membria to help you think better, decide faster, and never lose track of why. Think clearly. Move boldly. Own your decisions. Happy New Year!
🔥99🥰91🎉85🤩83❤🔥82👍79😍77❤73
Wow! We’re able to cut enterprise spending on AI chips and electricity by 75%. Just another piece of optimistic AI news! https://blog.actiq.ai/welcome-to-membria💭-sustainable-hybrid-ai-platform-coming-first-to-enterprises/
🎉88🤩83👍78❤72👏72🥰68🔥55🙏1
🔥 Actiquest x @Fetch_ai 🤝 Thrilled to partner with Fetch.ai to integrate $FET into Membria - decentralized memory layer for tiny AI and AI Live Pod, hyper-personalized on-device AI coach. Decentralized agents + persistent knowledge + token rewards = edge-native intelligence 🚀 Details (Blog Post)
🔥38👏28❤27🥰27🎉20🤩17👍12👨💻2
https://blog.actiq.ai/gui-nui-a-fireside-tale-of-the-next-natural-interface-shift/
🥰111🔥104👍101🤩101❤90👏89🎉88🏆1
$ACTICAT Token Roadmap HardCap 1,000,000,000 $ACTICAT Platform SOL Distribution Community, ~80% Team 0% Locks for 50% on TGE, 0-month Cliff, Investors 2 month linear vesting Giveaways up to 15% of total emission Utility AI Agent Token, Sport Coaching (Interconnected with Strava and Mini-app Web…
❤20🤩18👍15💯14❤🔥12🥰12😍11🎉10
👆Listing update. Actiquest team is finalizing the launch of $ACTICAT, the AI agent coin, inspired by AI Gamified Coach concept within the Actiq Ecosystem and AI Live Pod, a handheld local inference device. $ACTICAT is the first virtual personal sports coach (AI agent) that sees, hears, understands, and guides you to success in fitness and sports. $ACTICAT functions like an NPC (a character in a computer game) but is…
👍66🔥58🤩56👏55🥰54🎉52❤51🐳1
Over the past two years, generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has changed everything. In 2025, this trend will only intensify as technologies advance further, offering new possibilities in various fields. Generative 3D simulations, enhanced language models, and AI agents are becoming key development areas. These innovations open up enormous potential for personalized learning, fitness, and entertainment. As tec…
❤87🔥86👏84🥰80👍74🤩66🎉59🤡2
💡 If multimodal AI could run locally on devices, it would mark a significant breakthrough in how we interact with technology. It would become the natural home for AI reasoning agents — smart systems capable of understanding context by processing raw data from device sensors, cameras, and wearables. These agents would use this data to make complex, human-like decisions autonomously and almost in real-time 👌. What se…
🔥64👍61❤60🥰59🎉50🤩48👏44
Imagine a world where your devices truly get you 💻, like a close friend who knows what you need ✨, often before you even ask. This is the promise of on-device AI, an exciting technology that’s about to change our lives in ways we’re only just starting to grasp. Until now, Generative AI has mostly lived in the cloud, offering impressive capabilities but with certain trade-offs. That’s beginning to change, thanks to b…
🔥51🎉47👏47❤40🥰40👍33🤩31
🔥Alpaca Network and Actiq AI Partner to Revolutionize Sports Coaching with Decentralized AI Alpaca Network, a leader in decentralized AI infrastructure, and Actiq, an innovative sports coaching platform leveraging computer vision and machine learning, are excited to announce a strategic partnership. This collaboration aims to bring intelligent, AI-driven coaching to athletes worldwide, combining the strengths of dec…
👍71❤63👏59🎉55🔥55🥰54🤩41☃4
🖖Finally, Gate.io plans to list $ACTI in early December 🏆Actiquest builds sport related AI with vision and web3 based incentives to make sport training more productive.Actiq is an innovative app for sports enthusiasts (tennis, golf, cricket, and more) that coming in Q1 of 2025. Actiq is based on the advanced technology of gamified coaches with artificial intelligence (AIGC (https://docs.actiq.xyz/getting-started/ai_…
🥰118🔥117❤108👏107👍106🤩105🎉102
Don't miss Tokenize Everything space on Twitter, Mario Nawfal's Friday talk (Fri, Oct 25, at 7:00 PM). Mario Nawfal is a citizen journalist, Twitter Space Star, and our investor. The space will be recorded and stored here if you can't take part in it online.
👍118👏105❤101🎉99🔥97🥰95🤩73😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @actiqapp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,124,803 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@actiqapp named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Actiquest News Channel EN” (@actiqapp), 19,319 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/actiqapp.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.