11 measurements spanning 9 days, net -168. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,443–15,661 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 17:49
15,468
-19
13 Aug 2026, 11:23
15,487
-19
12 Aug 2026, 13:35
15,506
-21
11 Aug 2026, 10:47
15,527
-26
10 Aug 2026, 09:58
15,553
-21
9 Aug 2026, 12:01
15,574
-17
8 Aug 2026, 14:06
15,591
-19
7 Aug 2026, 14:45
15,610
-15
6 Aug 2026, 15:41
15,625
-11
6 Aug 2026, 02:20
15,636
no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:08
15,636
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 9 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
42s
Average length
21s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,635 reactions across 19 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
795
48.6%
🔥
331
20.2%
⚡
210
12.8%
❤🔥
152
9.30%
🌭
73
4.46%
🍾
44
2.69%
🗿
30
1.83%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,635reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 January 2025 to 7 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
62
across the posts below
Posts paid on
13
of 19 we hold a reading for · 68%
Most on one post
23
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tonpad_updates. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 January 2025 to 7 March 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
TonPad 🤝 Traffy - announcing a new partnership!
We are pleased to announce a new partnership with
Traffy - a traffic aggregator in Telegram!
Now we will promote presales together and attract quality audience to new projects with maximum efficiency. This is a new level of scaling for token launches via TonPad.
🦋 Watch for updates - we'll soon tell you exactly how it will work!
🤟 Airdrop is coming!
Yes, it’s happening! Our airdrop is on the horizon — are you getting ready?
The more you play, collect points, and invite friends, the bigger your future rewards will be. Start now to maximize your airdrop when the time comes!
🔥 Stay tuned, details coming soon…
😱 The whole Tromp fam’s in the TG Chat already — WHERE YOU AT?!
🔥 Discussing pumps, memes, and how to make TON great again!
Don’t miss the family gathering!
👉 https://t.me/tromp_portal
🚨 Less than 2 hours left 🚨 until the completion of $TROMP Pre-Sale!
$30,000+ of investments and more than 550 holders!
🔥 This is your last chance to buy $TROMP at the pre-sale price!
👉 BUY $TROMP NOW
👉 BUY $TROMP NOW
👉 BUY $TROMP NOW
📣 There are 24 hours left until the completion of $TROMP Pre-Sale!
Last day to grab it at a tasty price - next is only the listing on DEX, and judging by the tokenomics, vesting and partners, the project is set for a long game.
👀 What are the current indicators?
🚀300+ holders in a couple of days, capitalization is already over $30K.
🚀 Memes on TON are starting to shoot – there is demand, but supply is limited.
…
🚨 SNAPSHOT COMPLETE! 🚨
We did it, frens — 100,000,000 $TROMP SOLD!
The snapshot of our Giveaway has been taken, and the 20 lucky winners will receive their 1,000,000 $TROMP each. 🔫
😊 Rewards will be distributed on the final vesting day — stay tuned!
This is just the beginning. $TROMP keeps winning, and so do you.
🤨 Diamond hands hold. Paper hands cry!
⚡️ BIGGEST GIVEAWAY BY TONPAD⚡️
TonPad x TROMP have announced a massive giveaway! Buy tokens on the public round and get 1,000,000 $TROMP!
😮 10 investors (winners) will receive 😮
1,000,000 $TROMP after 100kk coins are purchased in the Public round!
This is your chance to be part of something big while securing a shot at a generous reward. 🔫
📌 How to participate?
- Purchase $TROMP tokens.
- Stay tuned for updates…
🚬 OVER 160 INVESTORS IN JUST 24 HOURS! 🚬
Market cap is already nearing $25K and climbing fast!
😱 WHAT IS GOING ON?!**
We launched less than a day ago, and already 160 hungry predators have swooped in to claim their slice of the $TROMP pie!
Still hiding in the bushes? Don’t come crying later saying you couldn’t get in at the best price…
💡 Pro Tip
Share the $TROMP page on TonPad and earn $TON for every friend who …
🤔 WHOA WHOA WHOA, SLOW DOWN!
With all the investment rounds and the pre-sale combined, $TROMP market cap is already closing in on $25K… and guess what?
😔 WE HAVEN’T EVEN STARTED MARKETING YET!
This isn’t just a token; this is a new rocket warming up on the launchpad.
👉 Hop in now or watch us fly from the sidelines!
👉 Hop in now or watch us fly from the sidelines!
👉 Hop in now or watch us fly from the sidelines!
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tonpad_updates. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 January 2025 to 7 March 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 480,660 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@tonpad_updates named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@dollar_tromp named in 22 posts, 8 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TonPad News & Updates” (@tonpad_updates), 15,468 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tonpad_updates.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.