近日,有网友(李颖它自己)挖出馆长直播片段…… 谁都能看出,李颖已经与青蛙国伪政权有千丝万缕的联系,它都懒得掩饰什么🤣 翻墙的中国人会自发抹黑“馆长”,因为馆长的发言,使他们的形象从“独立思考的反抗者”转变为“买10块钱一个月VPN的傻子”
🤣4

Channel
@actionshanghai
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
911subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001182049767 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @actionshanghai |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/actionshanghai |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:42 | 911 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:47 | 911 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 12 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
11 reactions across 3 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🍾 | 4 | 36.4% | |
| 🤣 | 4 | 36.4% | |
| 🫡 | 3 | 27.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 12 April 2025 to 13 June 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
近日,有网友(李颖它自己)挖出馆长直播片段…… 谁都能看出,李颖已经与青蛙国伪政权有千丝万缕的联系,它都懒得掩饰什么🤣 翻墙的中国人会自发抹黑“馆长”,因为馆长的发言,使他们的形象从“独立思考的反抗者”转变为“买10块钱一个月VPN的傻子”
🤣4
本频道编辑提出『三大解构』 1. 解构8️⃣9️⃣6️⃣4️⃣八九六四🔥 6月4日是结束不是开始。学生并未遭到有组织屠杀,暴徒手上有血债,他们被处决理所应当。“临场抗命”的部队并不存在。 2. 解构“防火长城”🔥🧱 结构上看,中共国“防火墙”(GFW、防火长城)并不存在。“墙”属于西方人/西化中国人 发明的(类冷战)自我矮化叙事。在中国的任何一部法律中,“墙”都不存在,因此“翻墙”、“翻墙违法”都属无稽之谈。 作为“墙”存在的集合是入侵检测系统(IDS),你会认为你所在国家的海关/边检(CBP) 是阻止你出国的吗? 通常称为“翻墙”的行为,与“困难” “高级”完全无关。『“两会”、“8964”期间VPN会变得不好用』是shadowsocksR作者周湛萍制造的刻奇。 3. 解构俄乌战争🇷🇺⚔️🇺🇦 俄乌战争是解放“小俄罗斯”、建立“新俄罗斯”的文明之战。小俄罗斯是进入工业文明的发达地区,有众多工业城市与港口,在2010年乌克兰…
“馆长”表述有点问题,rephrase:”翻墙“没有任何难度,且没有人管 ✅ 解构”中共防火墙“,亦是本频道的核心思想之一
八九六四🫡坦克节快乐💤 勿忘基辅独立广场大屠杀 勿忘敖德萨工会大屠杀
什么,难道爱猫英雄们都是假的吗 ? ⚠️🔞 该文章中的部分媒体具有较高冲击性,请务必在安全环境下观看👀 https://telegra.ph/%E7%88%B1%E7%8C%AB%E5%A4%A9%E5%9B%BD%E7%9C%9F%E7%9B%B8%E6%9D%B0%E5%85%8B%E8%BE%A3%E6%9D%A1%E5%BE%90%E5%BF%97%E8%BE%89%E5%88%97%E4%BC%A0-05-01 为了防止被杜罗夫连坐,不链接转载自 langmaoTV
热烈庆祝粉碎『八九六四』反革命暴乱36周年🎉
🍾4
新梗:以色列人将取得二战式的胜利✌️ This tweet violated X rules
🫡3
#青蛙国 🐸政府机构批判性采购 #中共国 IT服务🫡🇨🇳 https://imgur.com/nA4PmEA
这是 #中共国 最邪恶的两位略猫区,猫孝子们敢和他们对视30秒吗? #基米头槌 是什么梗 猫孝子开得起 #宝马 吗 更新:通报出来了,女的不算,居然是碰巧把哈基米爱死了
「文科生才是自由世界的开拓者」👩🎓🚀 「这十年来从互联网起的变革,都是女性和LGBTQ人群主导的」💃🏳️🌈🏳️⚧️
经典回顾:人们不禁想问,为什么站上街头宣传罢免连署的多是女性? https://x.com/initiumnews/status/1924616238531055706
https://www.163.com/dy/article/JUM0STSI05561GTD.html 目田汪左兔友猫友怕了吗?全世界老保们,团结起来! 胜利万岁🫡 🚩
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @actionshanghai. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,315,954 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🇹🇼 экшен Шанхай 🇷🇺” (@actionshanghai), 911 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/actionshanghai.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.