Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Quantus tremor est futurus - Actaeon Journal

@actaeonjournal

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

415subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001658080079
TypeChannel
Username@actaeonjournal
DescriptionMagnus ab integro saeclorum nascitur ordo.
Created4 February 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/actaeonjournal

Growth

4156 Aug 2026, 12:51 — 415 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 19:32 — 415 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 12:516 Aug 2026, 19:32
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 414–416 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 19:32415no change
6 Aug 2026, 12:51415first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 3 April 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
640
Videos
12
Links
218

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

17 Jun 2025, 16:59 UTC350 viewsread 6 August 2026

Part of what separates the old Left communists from the New Left is the belief in subjectivity, even if this only amounts to a reversal of subjectivity. The New Left views capital as an abstraction, a vector of historicism, which results in a stale type of Enlightenment pessimism.

26 May 2025, 21:12 UTC349 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

“Er sah ihn stürzen, trinken Und sinken tief ins Meer, die Augen täten ihm sinken, Trank nie einen Tropfen mehr.” [He saw it plunging and filling, And sinking deep in the sea: Then fell his eyelids for ever, And never more drank he!] That to which all politics returns.

26 May 2025, 17:05 UTC290 viewsread 6 August 2026

"actaeon journal cuts to the chase: ‘pacifist liberal internationalism’ via a ‘consensus of nations’ is a contradiction in terms and always was. the charade was propped up first by the boogeyman of a ‘communist’ soviet union, now by a ‘sinicist’ china. atlanticist nato is now an impotent shuffling zombie, a hollow shell, form without meaning. but the resources still have to be extracted from somewhere for the profit-

26 May 2025, 17:02 UTC288 viewsread 6 August 2026

Unfortunately the question of hatred is implicit, or rather, something worse than hatred is the result of nations today, whether pacifist or militarist. How is a nation recognised today? By election of already recognised states within the world’s governing body: the United Nations, or what was better termed the Society of Nations. There is however a contradiction at the heart of this process, on the one hand a nation

26 May 2025, 17:01 UTC260 viewsread 6 August 2026

"Sure, but advocating for one’s ancestral identity presupposes any sort of “hatred”. It’s simply asking for a place to live autonomously without fear of retribution from the highest liberal class. Alliances between races can happen organically so long as there is mutual respect for each other’s sovereignty. A nation is responsible for identifying what forces contribute to its dissonance."

26 May 2025, 17:00 UTC254 viewsread 6 August 2026

This is also the mistake of racial protest: hatred without an enemy. It is alien to the democratic form in its language, and yet capitulates to its rule of limited struggle. The result is a further abstraction of the problems of race. Spengler was mistaken in seeing an ultimate war of the races. Any racial conflict will be subsumed by democracy's anti-war character. What is recognised as a race in the shadow of two h

26 May 2025, 17:00 UTC255 viewsread 6 August 2026

We are today divided from nationalism as much as from God. The old hatred is lost to us. This is also part of Jünger's turn from ‘vitalism'.

26 May 2025, 16:59 UTC214 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @actaeonbooksPhoto

"Léon Bloy's effect on Ernst Jünger presents an extraordinary problem. For Jünger could only approach Bloy, the ‘pariah’ with his wild hatred of Protestants, Prussians, and Germans, by overcoming the most violent disgust. But Léon Bloy's diaries are also prototypical, I could even say constitutive for the 'diary' as a type, because in one fell swoop they leave the romantic-impressionistic soul-searching behind, they

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @actaeonjournal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 47,552 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Quantus tremor est futurus - Actaeon Journal” (@actaeonjournal), 415 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/actaeonjournal.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.