у кого больше?
👍5
Signed abuzer

Channel
@abuzer0x_life
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
775subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002304308132 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @abuzer0x_life |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 13 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/abuzer0x_life |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:58 | 775 | -6 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:47 | 781 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:20 | 781 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 13 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
91 reactions across 11 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 62 | 68.1% | |
| 😁 | 23 | 25.3% | |
| 🤡 | 4 | 4.40% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 2.20% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 91reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 13 March 2025 to 1 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
у кого больше?
👍5
Signed abuzer
Кто то говорил что стоит сюда постить - жЫзнь, ну окей пробуем, немного крымского утреннего вайба вам. *причину инактива возможно позже раскрою, ну а пока тыкайте 👍 если такой контент имеет место быть
👍16🤡4
Signed abuzer
Ну я еще на адекватичах У вас как?
😁8👍1
Signed abuzer
фух Пронесло..😅
😁9👍2
Signed abuzer
Вроде бы дали клейм, но что то не чувствуется Я ща в барбере, так что у меня происходит двойная побривка Пс. Вышел по STO в микро минус, хуйню какую то делают, лучше скипну
Signed abuzer
Пробую лудка шорт $STO В 13:30 разлок 7,4% Пс. Взял только 1 акк, не дома
Signed abuzer
Прикрыл пару аккаунтов, остальные в бу и до укатки, клейм вышел слабый. делитесь результатами
👍5
Signed abuzer
Ищу твх под шорт PUMP в 21:45 должны дать клейм. Обязательно кросс, ликвидности в стакане мало, и обязательно лимиточкой берите. Закрывать тоже надо надо лимиткой (иначе большую часть профита может скушать) MEXC / DEX !! Могут выбривать шортистов, будьте аккуратны
👍2
Signed abuzer
Кароче я всё проспал к хуям 😎 Лонг по нищему закрыл, под шорт твх проебал. Что что, так вот это факт
😁2😢2
Signed abuzer
Что бы трекнуть инфу о выходе IDO в числе первых: Заходим @redactedsystemsbot (30 дней фри доступ) > @BinanceWallet добавляем в трекер, ждём-с.
👍3😁1
Signed abuzer
Взял $BNB в лонг, завтра новое IDO (не офф инфа). 60% от желаемой позы взял, как инфа подтвердиться доберу оставшиеся.
👍5😁3
Signed abuzer
Новый вид скама🚨 На сайтах токенов теперь появились фейк claudflare вериф при нажатии которого вам на комп скачивается файл и потом доейнит кошельки, хотел поделится чтобы обезопасить вас, спасибо за внимание, репост признателен 🙏
👍8
Signed abuzer
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @abuzer0x_life. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“abuzer life” (@abuzer0x_life), 775 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/abuzer0x_life.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.