Channel
@abusolih_tolib
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
490subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002593328716 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @abusolih_tolib |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/abusolih_tolib |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:04 | 490 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:20 | 491 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:38 | 491 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (5 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,840 |
| Reactions total | 36 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 04:20 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
36 reactions across 9 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 29 | 80.6% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 13.9% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 5.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 36reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Хочу поделиться мыслью. Некоторые братья оставляют те или иные курсы лишь по причине стыда писать устазу, что он не мог и у него не получилось, думая что его отчитают или выгонят и лучше уж он сам выйдет не сказав причину, чем отчитается перед другими братьями или устазом, хочется сказать таким братьям что не стоит вводить себя в заблуждение и покидать группы по этой причине, не нужно бояться говорить "извините" ил…
❤6
первый том,это база,после которой уже можно начать смотреть другие полезные уроки
я сейчас это говорю не для рекламы ,а как искренний совет https://t.me/arabic_bisuhulah/4279 напишите в бот,вступите в курс и на этот раз доведите дело до конца,имея крепкую связь с модераторами
дело не в формате а в тебе,в том,что ты когда не укладываешься в дедлайн просто пропадаешь,вместо того,чтобы сообщить о проблеме,получить отсрочку и исправить свою ситуацию
сколько было людей,которые сказали «мне не подходит этот формат» а в итоге и остальные все форматы тоже «не подошли ему»
я не хочу жаловаться,просто подумайте сами пожалуйста те кто заложали в том или ином деле,зачем вы пытаетесь увильнуть от этого курса и найти «волшебную таблетку» напишите как есть «устаз,я не смог в прошлый раз учиться,так как в первые дни дедлайна думал что можно и потом,но в последний день дедлайна у меня уже дела были было стыдно просить у вас отсрочку,поэтому я вообще оставил курс,можно будет снова вступить»
но таких,кто не боится своих ошибок и не прячется от них - а наоборот исправляет - таких единицы
был также другой брат,который заучивал каждый день по аяту одному,а затем через 5 дней говорил,что все пять аятов,которые он заучивал - забыл но он тоже не стеснялся в требовании знаний и в один из дней Аллах открыл ему и даровал ему внезапно хорошую память что он смог прийти на урок заучив полстраницы (хотя раньше это у него занимало 2-3 недели)
у меня есть ученик по хифзу,сейчас тоже он учится этот брат на уроке может делать 20 ошибок и это для него норма,он не заучил эту суру «плохо» нет,он учил ее и повторял другие по 2-3 часа каждый день (что очень много для обычного человека кто учится в учебном заведении) но он ни разу не говорил «каждый раз у меня огромное количество ошибок,значит это не мое» он писал мне настойчиво,я бывало его каждый день проверя…
💯2👍1
дело вообще не в том,что он «не может» найти время на курс но дело в том,что у него нафс,привыкший проигрывать и он поддакивает этому нафсу мы не будем говорить про 3% трудяг,которые кроме работы другое сделать не могут в силу усталости и отсутствия вообще какой либо восприимчивости после работы будем говорить о большинстве,которые когда-то пробовали то или иное дело и когда у них не получилось сказали себе «вот,э…
сколько в наше время людей,которые начинают тот или иной курс или дело и при первом препятствии или ладно 3-4 сдаются
про тех,кто сразу сдается ⤵️
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @abusolih_tolib. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 534,945 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“أبو صالح | غفر الله له” (@abusolih_tolib), 490 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/abusolih_tolib.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.