Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝐀𝐁𝐔𝐒𝐄𝐑

@abuserpm

On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry

147subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003690587578
TypeChannel
Username@abuserpm
Description@abyezv
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 24 March 2026β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/abuserpm

Growth

14710 Aug 2026, 14:48 β€” 147 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 15:00 β€” 147 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 14:4810 Aug 2026, 15:00
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 146–148 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 15:00147no change
10 Aug 2026, 14:48147first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 24 March 2026 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β€” we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
2
Videos
39
Links
9

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 β€” not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
4m 28s
Average length
16s

Measured directly from 17 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β€” not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no β‰ˆ mark.

Reaction mix

76 reactions across 18 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 9.21% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❀79.21%
⚑56.58%
🌚56.58%
πŸŽ„45.26%
πŸ†45.26%
πŸ‘45.26%
πŸ”₯45.26%
😎45.26%
🀩45.26%
❀‍πŸ”₯33.95%
🍾33.95%
πŸ™Š33.95%
🀯33.95%
πŸ₯°33.95%
🍌22.63%
πŸ“22.63%
🐳22.63%
πŸ‘22.63%
😁22.63%
😍22.63%
6 further kinds810.5%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 76reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 24 March 2026 to 10 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Apr 2026, 16:07 UTC145 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

πŸŽ„3❀‍πŸ”₯1🐳1πŸ‘1πŸ•Š1

8 Apr 2026, 19:16 UTC157 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

vs BLIZZARDπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Ώ 1:0

πŸŽ„1πŸ”₯1

7 Apr 2026, 01:55 UTC142 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

vs ABSUOLUTEπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Ώ 1:0

🀯2πŸ‘1

6 Apr 2026, 18:20 UTC125 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

vs INSAINERSπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Ώ 1:1

🀩2❀‍πŸ”₯1🌚1πŸ†1πŸ€”1😎1πŸ™Š1

1 Apr 2026, 19:10 UTC159 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

vs NACHOπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Ώ 2:0

🌚1🍾1πŸ₯°1

1 Apr 2026, 18:53 UTC105 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @machopmn1

Top 5 uzb by Nekroz πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Ώ πŸ†Whyme 1.JamshidπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Ώ NeverπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Ώ 2.CowboyπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Ώ FaxaπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Ώ 3.TunystπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Ώ DekuπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Ώ 4.ClosyπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Ώ AbuserπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Ώ 5.SamuelπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Ώ707πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Ώ

🌚3πŸ“1πŸ”₯1🀩1🀯1πŸ™Š1

1 Apr 2026, 10:57 UTC145 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

vs BEKBOIπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Ώ 1:0

😎2πŸ†1😑1

30 Mar 2026, 20:49 UTC187 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

vs REFLEXπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Ώ 1:0

❀1🍾1πŸ‘1🀩1πŸ₯°1😎1πŸ™Š1

29 Mar 2026, 20:52 UTC160 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

vs INFINITYπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Ώ

🐳1πŸ₯°1😁1😑1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @abuserpm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œπ€ππ”π’π„π‘β€ (@abuserpm), 147 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/abuserpm.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.