Channel
@abuismailnotes
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4,881subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001574310497 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @abuismailnotes |
| Description | I will be sharing my notes on different topics, I hope it is of benefit for the Muslims. |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/abuismailnotes |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @abuismailnotes/579 · this entry17 Jul 2025, 16:14 UTC | @researchhadith/376417 Jul 2025, 16:21 UTC | 1.00 | 7 minutes |
| @abuismailnotes/584 · this entry18 Jul 2025, 10:28 UTC | @researchhadith/376519 Jul 2025, 09:09 UTC | 1.00 | 23 hours |
| @abuismailnotes/586 · this entry21 Jul 2025, 09:01 UTC | @researchhadith/376621 Jul 2025, 09:05 UTC | 1.00 | 4 minutes |
| @abuismailnotes/588 · this entry22 Jul 2025, 16:19 UTC | @researchhadith/376722 Jul 2025, 16:19 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @abuismailnotes/590 · this entry23 Jul 2025, 11:27 UTC | @researchhadith/376823 Jul 2025, 11:37 UTC | 1.00 | 10 minutes |
| @abuismailnotes/600 · this entry29 Jul 2025, 18:09 UTC | @researchhadith/376929 Jul 2025, 18:09 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @researchhadith | 10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 4 minutes | this entry (10–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 19 comparable posts for this entry, running 14 July 2025 to 10 August 2025. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @abuismailnotes — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 6 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:52 | 4,881 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:21 | 4,880 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:16 | 4,880 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 14 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
491 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 92.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 452 | 92.1% | |
| 💔 | 17 | 3.46% | |
| 💯 | 9 | 1.83% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 1.43% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 0.611% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 0.407% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 0.204% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 491reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2025 to 10 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📢 New Resource Available: The Methodology of the Saved Sect Based on the book by Shaykh Muḥammad ibn Jamīl Zaynū. I’ve prepared a concise presentation on the core principles and application of the Methodology of the Saved Sect, essential for staying upon the path of truth in today’s many differing voices. These slides are designed to make complex concepts easy to grasp, whether for personal study, group discussion…
❤29❤🔥2
Facing the Elephant in the Room: Rekindling the Spirit of Islamic Struggle Why Avoiding the Discussion of Jihād Endangers Our Future Why should we be surprised when many distort and reject Jihād if the people remain ignorant of its true rulings? We must approach the study of Jihād with the same seriousness and dedication as we do learning how to pray and fast, especially in our current time. 💻 Al-Harakah | The Mo…
❤7👍4
Seek Knowledge to Serve, Not to Store "The more seekers of knowledge we have, the more present we should be on the ground, guiding our youth, implementing what we’ve learned, and enjoining good while forbidding evil. If knowledge does not lead to action, we must question whether we are truly seeking it for Allāh or merely accumulating evidences against ourselves for tomorrow. This holiday season, let’s step out of…
❤22
Today is The Day to Give Give to our Islamic School in Afghanistan, your donation will help over 300 students. “Giving charity (on Fridays) has a distinct advantage over the rest of the weekdays. Its superiority is similar to giving charity in the month of Ramaḍān in contrast to the rest of the months.” [Zād al-Maʿād | 1/394 - Ibn al-Qayyim] Don't hold back brothers and sisters, give to the Ummah https://www.la…
❤12👍1💘1
When Scholars Stop Activism and Activists Stop Seeking: The Ummah Loses Its Pulse Facing the disconnect between those who know and those who move Until this fusion takes place, we will continue to witness a fractured Ummah, one side rich in knowledge but stagnant in change, and the other full of movement but bankrupt in meaning. It is not either/or. It is both. The scholar and the activist. The one who knows and t…
❤12🔥1
In the Light of Rubūbiyyah: Allāh the Perfect Creator and Sustainer "We may tire of gazing at cars and towering buildings crafted by human hands, but the endless beauty and power of Allāh’s creation, the great mountains, the flowing streams of fresh water, the radiant sun, and the vast sky, always captures the heart. No man can fashion such wonders, for they belong solely to the Perfect Creator, Allāh." 🖊️ Abū Ism…
❤45
When Life Changes, Let Your Heart Stay With Allāh ”When happiness enters your life, thank Allāh with humility, for it is His mercy. And when you’re tested, trust in Him completely, for it is His wisdom. This world is a delicate blend of ease and trial, joy and sorrow. Prepare your heart for both, and anchor it in Him, for only with Allāh does the heart find peace in every season.” 🖊️ Abū Ismā’īl
❤59💯8
Through the Gates of Trial to the Gardens of Eternity Imām Ibn al-Qayyim رحمه الله said: “Whoever is created for Jannah, will forever be afflicted with calamities.” [al-Fawa’īd | 36] “The believer walks a path paved with trials, each gate harder than the last. But with every hardship endured, he draws closer to the final gate, the gate of Jannah. This journey was never meant to be easy, for paradise was never …
❤41
Serving Allāh with Clear Vision: A Call to Strategic, Legacy-Driven Action Multi Vision Syndrome: The Crisis of Confusion Holding Back Our True Potential Too many are caught in a cycle of hype and burnout, sincere, energetic, but without direction. It’s time we realign our vision build something that lasts. "True growth in faith and in service comes not from fleeting bursts of devotion, but from steadfast commitme…
❤9
Visit our site https://alharakah.substack.com
❤11
Julaybīb The Great Warrior Loved by the Prophet ﷺ "This man is from me and I am from him.” Julaybīb’s story of hidden virtue, prophetic love, and a martyr’s eternal honour In a world obsessed with status and appearance, the story of Julaybīb (رضي الله عنه) reminds us of a greater truth: It is not who you are in the eyes of people, but who you are before Allāh. 💻 Al-Harakah | The Movement Read Full Article & Subsc…
❤29
📢 Ashbāl Al-Ummah Announcement - Light has come for the Scholars of Tomorrow 📢 Alhamdulillah, our solar panels have been successfully installed for our madrasah in Kabul, bringing sustainable electricity to the school that had none. No more praying in the dark. No more learning Qur’an by candlelight. This is more than power, it’s progress, dignity, and hope. We at Ashbāl Al-Ummah want to thank everyone that donate…
❤16
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @abuismailnotes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 374,686 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Abū Ismā’īl Notes” (@abuismailnotes), 4,881 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/abuismailnotes.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.