Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Абрамов

Channel

Абрамов

@abramov_psy

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

132subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002458107325
TypeChannel
Username@abramov_psy
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/abramov_psy

Growth

1329 Aug 2026, 19:17 — 132 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 23:33 — 132 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 19:179 Aug 2026, 23:33
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 131–133 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 23:33132no change
9 Aug 2026, 19:17132first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 23 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
68.1%
avg views ÷ 132 subscribers
Avg views / post
89.9
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
18.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held20 (23 June 20269 August 2026)
Views total989
Reactions total182
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 19:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

368 reactions across 20 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
11832.1%
🔥4211.4%
❤‍🔥4111.1%
👍308.15%
😍236.25%
💔215.71%
👏174.62%
💯123.26%
🙏112.99%
🤔102.72%
🐳82.17%
💘71.90%
🕊71.90%
😢71.90%
61.63%
20.543%
💊20.543%
🆒10.272%
🤝10.272%
🤩10.272%
1 further kind10.272%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 368reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
31
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 20 we hold a reading for · 30%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @abramov_psy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 June 2026 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 13:05 UTC29 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Все повторяется из раза в раз Почему курсы про отношения не работают В кабинете психолога часто можно услышать: «в этих отношениях повторилось ровно то же самое, что и в предыдущих». В этих словах много боли, тревоги и отчаяния. И почти всегда один и тот же вопрос: что, если это я не способен на другие отношения? Дело в том, что нам гораздо легче выстраивать отношения ровно с теми объектами, которые нам уже известн

4🙏4❤‍🔥2

5 Aug 2026, 06:02 UTC72 views29 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Меня зовут Кирилл Абрамов. Обо мне: Я психоаналитический психолог. Я помогаю лучше понять себя, найти решения внутренних конфликтов и начать жить свободнее. Я уважаю индивидуальность и самобытность человека и верю в то, что психика каждого из нас - это отдельная вселенная. Психоаналитический метод, в котором я работаю, позволяет добиться глубоких и долгосрочных изменений качества жизни. Образование: Я окончил магис

12🔥7👍3🐳21💘1🕊1🤝1

5 Aug 2026, 06:01 UTC65 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Друзья, мое внимание обратили на то, что в канале нет поста-приветствия с информацией обо мне. Исправляюсь 🙂

4👏3👍1

1 Aug 2026, 07:23 UTC93 views18 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Часто можно наткнуться на советы из разряда “как войти в контакт со своими желаниями?”. Как обычно, за достаточно простыми вопросами из поп-психологии лежит сложная работа психики. Вопрос звучит так, будто внутри лежит что-то готовое и надо только расчистить завалы, накопившиеся за годы, “прочистить” автоматические мысли. Давайте вернемся к началу нашего существования (а что вы хотели, читая психоаналитического тера

7👍5❤‍🔥2🐳1👏1💘1🕊1

31 Jul 2026, 18:13 UTC68 views20 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @hsepsychoanalysisVideo message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥5😍54👍3🐳1💘1🕊1

31 Jul 2026, 18:13 UTC71 views22 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @hsepsychoanalysisVideo message

Video message, posted without a caption

😍85❤‍🔥4👍2🐳1💘1🕊1

31 Jul 2026, 18:13 UTC82 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026

На днях на моей магистерской программе меня попросили рассказать, как я принял решение поступать на психоанализ в Вышку. Решил поделиться и с вами 😊

😍41🐳1👍1💘1🕊1🥰1

28 Jul 2026, 09:02 UTC120 views17 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Место для нового О пространстве, в которое можно поместить другой опыт Мы обычно ждем, что перемены начнутся снаружи. Уйдем с работы - все будет иначе. Уедем в другой город - там точно все по-другому. Но если внутри нашей психики нет пространства для нового опыта, то внешние изменения ничего не поменяют. Психике нужно пространство и время, чтобы принять новый опыт, а не переработать его по старым правилам. То, для

7❤‍🔥3😍3🐳1👍1💘1🕊1

24 Jul 2026, 17:38 UTC137 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Творчество как признак живого Что рождается между В бытовом языке под творчеством принято понимать искусство. Но можно посмотреть на него под иным углом, как на способ обращения с реальностью. Можно приспосабливаться к миру, делая “как надо”, соответствуя чужим ожиданиям и угадывая чужие желания. А можно каждый раз открывать мир заново, привнося в него новое. Первый способ Винникотт называл послушанием и связывал

5😍3❤‍🔥2🐳1👍1💘1🕊1

21 Jul 2026, 07:59 UTC133 views16 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Почему так важно говорить О том, как молчание становится наследством Во многих семьях принято замалчивать сложный опыт - насилие, алкоголизм, не-любовь, измены, репрессии, даже болезни. Об этом не говорят. Если о чем-то не говорить, то оно ведь исчезнет? Но психика устроена иначе. Происходит что-то намного хуже. То, о чем не говорят, нельзя переработать и оплакать. Нельзя злиться. Оно не исчезает, но замуровываетс

6🔥3😢3❤‍🔥1👍1👏1🤔1

19 Jul 2026, 15:27 UTC119 views18 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Вы не обязаны себя любить Я очень критично отношусь к идее «я такой, какой есть, и надо любить себя именно таким». Концепт self-love устроен просто: все мысли, которые не вписываются в «любовь к себе», нужно забить. Любое сомнение в себе, любое недовольство собой объявляется токсичным. И тут возникает парадокс: такая «любовь» порождает больше ненависти. Ведь запрет на ненависть противоречит фундаментальному закону

8👏5🤔4👍1

16 Jul 2026, 15:59 UTC129 views21 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Телефон как способ не чувствовать Замечали, в какие моменты рука сама тянется к телефону? Стало тревожно - открыть ленту. Невозможно выдержать скуку - в телефон. Страшно - телефон. Неловкая пауза в разговоре - телефон. Даже когда поняли, что идете не в ту сторону, перед тем как развернуться - сделать вид, что смотрите в телефон. Телефон стал идеальным способом не проживать эмоции. Не единственным, ведь человечество

12🔥5👏3👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @abramov_psy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,101,387 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Абрамов” (@abramov_psy), 132 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/abramov_psy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.