Gambling & betting โ a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channelโs own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a modelโs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
7 measurements spanning 5 days, net +3,682. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โno change observedโ, never โinterpolatedโ. The vertical axis spans 338,890โ343,676 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 16:56
343,124
+525
11 Aug 2026, 16:44
342,599
+748
10 Aug 2026, 18:11
341,851
+929
9 Aug 2026, 16:35
340,922
+437
8 Aug 2026, 17:37
340,485
+1,043
7 Aug 2026, 19:30
339,442
no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:22
339,442
first reading
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 25 January 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
964
Videos
171
Links
130
Lifetime counters from Telegramโs own channel header, read 12 August 2026 โ not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramโs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
28s
Average length
28s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ not this channelโs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโs own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ mark.
Reaction mix
2,787 reactions across 15 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
โค
1,667
59.8%
โคโ๐ฅ
633
22.7%
๐
114
4.09%
๐
113
4.05%
๐ญ
59
2.12%
๐ข
53
1.90%
๐
52
1.87%
๐ฅฐ
27
0.969%
๐
20
0.718%
๐ฅ
12
0.431%
๐
8
0.287%
๐
7
0.251%
๐จ
7
0.251%
๐พ
5
0.179%
๐
4
0.144%
๐
2
0.072%
๐ค
2
0.072%
๐
1
0.036%
๐ฆ
1
0.036%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 2,787reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 25 January 2026 to 17 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
22
across the posts below
Posts paid on
13
of 15 we hold a reading for ยท 87%
Most on one post
7
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars โ bought with money โ on a post by @aboutlovepoetry. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 January 2026 to 17 March 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramโs short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @aboutlovepoetry. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions โ Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channelโs posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@aboutlovepoetry named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleโs history โ see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today โ not that anything โdiedโ. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant โ a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@ngngweo named in 4 posts, 8 August 2026 โ 12 August 2026 ยท confirmed gone 8 August 2026 (two independent sightings โ see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel โ we have no record it ever was one.
@neera_4 named in 4 posts, 8 August 2026 โ 12 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 โ this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ๐ ๐ป๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐พ ๐๐๐พ๐๐๐โ (@aboutlovepoetry), 343,124 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aboutlovepoetry.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.