Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

👋 Hey! It’s banda

@abouthub

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

52subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001985511602
TypeChannel
Username@abouthub
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/abouthub

Growth

528 August 2026 — 52 subscribers10 August 2026 — 52 subscribers8 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 51–53 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 10:1652no change
8 Aug 2026, 12:0452first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 16 January 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 July 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
8
Videos
1
Links
9

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
19s
Average length
19s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

133 reactions across 14 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥2921.8%
2518.8%
❤‍🔥1612.0%
129.02%
💯107.52%
🦄96.77%
👍86.02%
🥰53.76%
🌚43.01%
😁43.01%
🤡32.26%
🫡32.26%
🙏21.50%
🤔21.50%
😐10.752%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 133reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 16 January 2024 to 25 July 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

25 Jul 2024, 09:59 UTC231 views12 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Коворкинг среда и окружение Чертовски круто, когда рядом есть like-minded сообщество ребят, с кем можно физически выбрать поковркать. Я провел 2 года жизни в таком окружении в Казанском Coffee Bean, после Скуратов. Сейчас же вижу, как это делают наши бандиты в Питере. Люди как productivity инфраструктура Пару мыслей о фундаментальной ценности совместных коворкинг таймов: — Выше accountability. Когда работаешь оди

❤‍🔥6💯4🙏2

Signed Vitaly Krenel

25 Jul 2024, 09:41 UTC198 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🌚4🤔2❤‍🔥1😁1😐1

1 Jul 2024, 10:33 UTC170 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥1👍1😁1

1 Jul 2024, 10:33 UTC142 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Иногда вот такое у нас за дверями происходит 😁

😁1

1 Jul 2024, 10:33 UTC151 viewsread 10 August 2026

Ну какой кайф на сайте датастепа!!

1 Jul 2024, 10:33 UTC187 viewsread 10 August 2026

Там в конце ещё "сделаем всё в лучшем виде, брат" с грузинским акцентом ну какаво!🤌

30 Jun 2024, 07:03 UTC128 views15 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @avoround

🦾 Путь к истинному мастерству через эксперименты и инновации - путь который я выбрал Это тема с которой я выступал в AI комьюнити codex.town недавно Запись: https://youtu.be/KVzYx0pMjZ0 Презентация: https://krenels.notion.site/AI-68fce49391f54be7940d0780ccfe66a9?pvs=4 Для выступлений я выбираю тему в которую сам верю, которую я проверил или использую на практике. Так что я хочу прям рассказать за нее Я хотел донес

🔥533👍2❤‍🔥1😁1

21 Jun 2024, 17:53 UTC125 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Вебинар прошел восторг. Получился не вебинар — а мини лекция от Славы, с диалогами и обсуждением в кулуарах. Эвент показал, что не задумывались об кейсах — например, Константин рассказал о кейсах, когда люди в компании могут саботировать внедрении AI. Никогда не задумался об этом, с учетом того, что в крупных компаниях линейный персонал как будто бы имеет ограниченный эффект на это. Зацепил Илья, который эксперемен

🔥4❤‍🔥3👍2🥰2

21 Jun 2024, 08:02 UTC364 views10 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🚀 Вебинар: «Оставайся на волне AI: Путь к истинному мастерству через эксперименты и инновации» Сегодня в 18:00 по Москве выступление Славы в club.codex.town. Начался "масс адопшен" AI: все залезли в тему, как будто “AI - это новый javascript”. Люди начали просто следовать масс трендам и создавать кучу GPT-like ботов с RAG под капотом, не вдумывая в суть масштаба Artificial Intelligence технологии. Как перейти от бе

💯4❤‍🔥3🫡3

18 Jun 2024, 10:53 UTC636 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

А еще мы продолжаем знакомиться с опытом различных участников ИИ-рынка и подводными камнями, а также интересными находками, с которыми они столкнулись во время работы. На следующей неделе у нас будет интересная встреча, темой которой станет тема экспериментов и исследований в ИИ в контексте прикладного применения результатов. 🚀 Вебинар: «Оставайся на волне AI: Путь к истинному мастерству через эксперименты и инновац

11🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @abouthub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 511,520 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“👋 Hey! It’s banda” (@abouthub), 52 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/abouthub.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.