Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

عابِرُ سَبيل

@aberusabil

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

737subscribers

+23 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002009169930
TypeChannel
Username@aberusabil
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 30 April 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/aberusabil

Growth

714737725.56 August 2026 — 714 subscribers6 August 2026 — 728 subscribers6 August 2026 — 728 subscribers12 August 2026 — 737 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +23. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 711–740 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 20:57737+9
6 Aug 2026, 16:35728no change
6 Aug 2026, 16:28728+14
6 Aug 2026, 03:19714first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 15 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
70.2%
avg views ÷ 737 subscribers
Avg views / post
517
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.35%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held20 (15 May 20265 August 2026)
Views total4,137
Reactions total180
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 16:35 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

457 reactions across 20 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
34575.5%
💔4610.1%
😢255.47%
😭245.25%
👏81.75%
🔥20.438%
🕊20.438%
❤‍🔥10.219%
👍10.219%
😁10.219%
😍10.219%
🙏10.219%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 457reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 May 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 20:36 UTC≈1,150 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

واقعا چقد ادم بايد خوشبخت باشه كه خدا دوست داشته باشه بهش گوش بده؟بنظرتون ارامش و اسايشي بالاتر از اين هست كه شنونده تو خدا باشه؟ #عابرسبيل @aberusabil

14👏1😍1

28 Jul 2026, 22:45 UTC366 views27 reactionsread 6 August 2026

اللهم لك الشكر علي نعمة الاب واجبر كسر من فقد والده يا الله خدایا، تو را سپاس می‌گویم برای نعمتِ پدر. و ای پروردگار، دلِ شکسته‌ی هر آن‌کس که پدرش را از دست داده است، مرهم باش و شکستگیِ قلبش را التيام ببخش.

22💔5

28 Jul 2026, 22:33 UTC349 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026

پستی دیدم که نوشته بود: «پدرت را با دو کلمه توصیف کن.» ناخوداگاه نوشتم: «پناهِ بی‌پناه...» و چه عجیب که این دو کلمه، وصفِ بسیاری از پدرانِ ماست. همان‌هایی که جان کندن را وظیفه می‌دانند و عرق ریختن را عادتِ زندگی. همان‌هایی که خستگی‌شان را کسی نمی‌بیند، دلگیری‌شان را عصبانیت می‌نامند و عصبانیتشان را ظلم. پدرها محکوم‌اند به قوی بودن... محکوم‌اند به اعتراض نکردن... محکوم‌اند به همیشه پناه بودن، همیشه امین بودن، همیشه حا

13💔3

21 Jul 2026, 17:57 UTC456 views22 reactionsread 6 August 2026

چند روز پیش، دخترِ یک فوتبالیست ثروتمند را در یک برنامه دیدم. رقص بلد بود، آواز می‌خواند، انگلیسی صحبت می‌کرد؛ حاصل سال‌ها آموزش، فرصت و امنیت. از دیدنش خوشحال شدم. راستش، لذت می‌بردم که کودکی توانسته در رفاه و با این همه امکانات و توجه بزرگ شود. خصوصا فرزند كسي كه خود از دل فقر و محدوديت به موفقيت رسيده. (اگرچه اين شخص از لحاظ فكري و انديشه كمي لنگ بزند...) خلاصه اينكه با ديدن اين دختر خانم همزمان با احساس خرسندي ا

21😁1

19 Jul 2026, 18:45 UTC342 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @fanus9

هرگاه با دوستی همراه شدی و دیدی رفتارش با تو تغییر کرده است، تو بر وفاداری و خوش‌رفتاری خود پایدار بمان و در برابر او تغییر نکن. برایش عذر بیاور؛ چرا که انسان، حالات و روحیات گوناگونی را تجربه می‌کند. مگر نه اینکه خودت نیز همیشه بر یک حال نمی‌مانی؟ پس چگونه از دیگری انتظار داری که همواره یکسان و بی‌تغییر بماند؟ •ابن جوزی رحمه الله 📚صید الخاطر @fanus9 | فانوس

17😢1

18 Jul 2026, 18:23 UTC457 views36 reactionsread 6 August 2026

امروز يه جووني رو ديدم به ناگاه مابين حرفاش با لحن سرخوش و گويي از سر افتخار گفت آتئيستم... گفتم شوخي كردي يا واقعي؟ گفت واقعي! راستش رو بخواي مثل قبل انرژي و نيروي روحي بحث علمي و فلسفي رو ندارم فقط يه جمله بهش گفتم(شايد اصلا براش مهمم نباشه) گفتم: ببين ميدوني بدترين و تاريك ترين نقطه آتئيستي يا بي باوري يا دوري از خدا چيه؟ گفت چيه؟ گفتم اينه كه الان تو فكر ميكني تو داري خدارو از زندگيت خط ميزني و دور ميشي اما سهمگي

28👏4😢4

16 Jul 2026, 16:37 UTC537 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026

دنياي عجيبيست... یک سویش میلیون‌ها نفر از صعود تیم محبوبشان به فینال جام جهاني سر از پا نمی‌شناسند؛ و سوی دیگر، پدر و مادرهایی که چشم‌انتظار بازگشت اندك باقیمانده‌ی پیکر پسر سربازشان هستند. اين آدم‌هاهم عجب موجوداتی‌اند، نه؟ آیا هیچ موجود دیگری جز انسان، برای اثبات حقانیت یا حفظ منافعش، این‌گونه هم‌نوع خود را می‌کشد؟ این‌گونه رؤیاها را به خاک می‌سپارد؟ به راستي اگر قدرت و نفت و سياست طعمی داشتند، چه طعمی بود؟ اگر بوی

11😢5👍1👏1

15 Jul 2026, 12:36 UTC480 views27 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

#عابرسبيل @aberusabil

💔16😢10❤‍🔥1

10 Jul 2026, 13:42 UTC694 views32 reactionsread 6 August 2026

خدايا مارو ببخش بخاطر هر بار كه خواستي مارو امتحان كني تا رشد كنيم و كاملتر بشيم اما عجول بوديم و ناشكر و معترض... ولي تو بازم به ما پشت نكردي و فرصت دادي كه سمتت برگرديم! #عابر_سبيل @aberusabil

24💔8

8 Jul 2026, 20:37 UTC≈3,250 views30 reactionsread 6 August 2026

خدايا شكرت بخاطر همه چيزهايي كه به ما دادي،قدر ندونستيم و بازهم ازمون نگرفتي!

24😢4🕊2

8 Jul 2026, 13:26 UTC826 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026

ما عادت داريم وقتي در موقعيت و يا در جايي خاص اگر اتفاق به ظاهر خوبي براي ما ميفته، ميگيم ديدي حكمتش چي بود؟خيرش تو اين بود... وقتي همون اتفاق در ادامه تبديل به واقعه اي بد ميشه چي؟ اونوقت ميگي نه!حكمتش در اين نبود؟ عادت آدمي است ديگر... همواره در شاديها سرمستيم و غرق خنده اما در رنج ها شاكي از خداوند و قدرش... در واقع هر دوي اين اتفاقات خير است اگر چه يكي مورد تاييد تو باشد و ديگري نباشد. ايمان يعني اينكه باور ك

14😢1

7 Jul 2026, 19:48 UTC822 views66 reactionsread 6 August 2026

اگر در آن روز در بهشت دور هم جمع شدين و من رو در بين خودتون نديدين به پروردگار بگين كه بزرگترين آرزويش كه هرگز خود را لايقش نميديد اما رحمت و مهر تو به او شجاعت آرزو كردنش را داده بود رؤيت پروردگارش در بهشتش بود… #عابرسبيل @aberusabil

40😭24💔2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @aberusabil. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 137,046 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“عابِرُ سَبيل” (@aberusabil), 737 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aberusabil.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.