Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 39% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 3 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 8 comparable posts for this entry, running 14 July 2026 to 4 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @abdullabakhramov — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
22 measurements spanning 82 days, net -1,534. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,663–9,657 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 22
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
29 Oct 2026, 00:59
7,893
-29
25 Oct 2026, 13:09
7,922
-24
22 Oct 2026, 12:39
7,946
-37
19 Oct 2026, 03:36
7,983
-53
15 Oct 2026, 17:08
8,036
-31
13 Oct 2026, 02:19
8,067
-97
7 Oct 2026, 02:42
8,164
-90
29 Sept 2026, 23:36
8,254
-288
16 Sept 2026, 06:41
8,542
-90
12 Sept 2026, 15:41
8,632
-53
8 Sept 2026, 17:35
8,685
-88
3 Sept 2026, 17:17
8,773
-68
31 Aug 2026, 16:35
8,841
-139
28 Aug 2026, 16:46
8,980
-100
25 Aug 2026, 16:52
9,080
-67
23 Aug 2026, 00:15
9,147
-34
19 Aug 2026, 22:34
9,181
-48
16 Aug 2026, 21:16
9,229
-88
13 Aug 2026, 11:47
9,317
-74
10 Aug 2026, 20:27
9,391
first reading
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 30 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
5m 59s
Average length
3m 00s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
400 reactions across 21 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
159
39.8%
❤
143
35.8%
🔥
55
13.8%
🥰
15
3.75%
🤝
12
3.00%
⚡
4
1.00%
👏
3
0.75%
🫡
3
0.75%
🕊
2
0.5%
😁
2
0.5%
🐳
1
0.25%
💯
1
0.25%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 400 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 21 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @abdullabakhramov. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Ustoz shogirdini emas, shogird ustozini tanlaydi.
Ba’zan qilgan mehnatingizning natijasi faqat yutuqlarda emas, insonlarning sizga bildirgan e’tirofida ham ko‘rinadi.
Ko‘p narsani o‘rgatgan insoningiz sizni ustoz deb bilmasligi mumkin. Ba’zida esa ko‘p narsa o‘rgatmasangiz ham, inson sizni o‘ziga ustoz deb biladi.
Chunki ustozlik — unvon emas, bu insonning sizga bo‘lgan hurmati va e’tirofi.
👥 Jamoa bu men kelajagimni ular bilan qurishni tasavvur qiladigan insonlarim..
Xodimlar, bular xuddiki vaqtinchadey. Ya’ni men ularni bunday qabul qilmayman, ular o‘zlari ularni o‘zlarini shunaqa tutadi.
Xodimlar, hozir ber menga, deydi. Mayli, menga ko‘p kerak emas, lekin hozir ber.
Jamoa esa, mayli, hozir kerak emas. Men sen bilan birga bo‘laman, siz bilan birga ishlayman, mehnat qilaman, ko‘taramiz. Keyin lekin…
🕌 Masjidimiz qurilishi eng chiroyli bosqichiga yetib keldi!
Alhamdulillah, bugun masjidimizning eng baland nuqtasiga hilol o‘rnatilmoqda. 🌙
Qurilish ishlari davom etmoqda, masjidimiz kundan-kunga yanada chiroyli ko‘rinish kasb etyapti.
Ushbu xayrli ishga o‘z hissasini qo‘shayotganimdan juda xursandman.
Ushbu izohlar! G’oliblarni tabriklab qolaman .
Yuqorida aytganimdek Odamlarni xursand qilishda davom etamiz qo’llab quvvatlasangiz bo’ldi🙌🏻
Video👇🏻
https://youtu.be/VuYCPiNLM7E?si=RQrv4CPqR1p_fv2b
💸YouTube videomiz izohlaridan 3 ta g’olibni tanlab oldim.💸
1) Randomniy tanlangan izoh
2) Eng ko’p like yig’gan, ko’pchilikka ma’qul bo’lgan izoh .
3) Menga va Jamoaga yoqqan eng yaxshi izoh
Videoda qanday aloqaga chiqish kerak hammasini aytib o’tdim👆🏻
"Onam gullarni yoqtirmaydi..."
Ko‘pchilikdan shunday gapni eshitganmiz. Lekin bir savol:
Dunyoda gullarni yoqtirmaydigan qiz bola bormi? Yo‘q.
Unda qanday qilib ona gullarni yoqtirmasligi mumkin?
Aslida, onalar gullarni yomon ko‘rishmaydi. Ular farzandini juda yaxshi ko‘rishadi.
Farzandining bir kun mehnat qilib topgan puliga qimmatbaho guldasta olganini ko‘rsa, "Menga gul kerak emas", deydi. Chunki o‘sha pulni far…
Bir paytlar shunday o'ylardim: muvaffaqiyatga faqat o'zimning mehnatim, harakatim, ishtiyoqim va to'kkan terim bilan erishaman.
Lekin natijalar kela boshlagach, bitta haqiqatni tushundim...
Hammasi Yaratganning izni bilan ekan.
Shuning uchun maqsadingiz sari shunday harakat qilingki, go'yo hammasi sizga bog'liq.
Ammo qalbingizda doim shuni unutmang: haqiqiy natija va muvaffaqiyatni beruvchi — Yaratganning O'zi.…
👍20❤7🔥5👏1💯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @abdullabakhramov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
💸 Investitsiya — bugun pulingizni ertaga ko‘proq qiymat olib keladigan aktivga yo‘naltirishdir.
Kim pulini ko’proq nimaga investitsiya qilayabdi?
Tilla32%
Ko’chmas mulk (Kvartira)63%
Mashina10%
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Abdullo Bakhramov || Hamjamiyat” (@abdullabakhramov), 7,893 subscribers as measured 29 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/abdullabakhramov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
