Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for قُرآنْ ِ﴿وَذَكِّرْ﴾ِ

Channel

قُرآنْ ِ﴿وَذَكِّرْ﴾ِ

@aari808

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

784subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 23 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002029838045
TypeChannel
Username@aari808
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded23 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/aari808

Growth

784785784.523 Aug 2026, 15:30 — 785 subscribers25 Aug 2026, 00:34 — 784 subscribers23 Aug 2026, 15:3025 Aug 2026, 00:34
2 measurements spanning 1 day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 784–785 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Aug 2026, 00:34784-1
23 Aug 2026, 15:30785first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.6%
avg views ÷ 784 subscribers
Avg views / post
98.8
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 August 2026
Posts held20 (10 August 202620 August 2026)
Views total1,976
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken23 Aug 2026, 15:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
42s
Average length
42s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

20 Aug 2026, 11:46 UTC54 viewsread 23 August 2026
Forwarded from @io90w

- التَّوحِيد : هِيَ كَلِمَةٌ ( لَا إلَهَ إلَّا اللَّهِ ). وَهُوَ إفرَادٌ اللَّه بِالعِبَادَة . إركَان تَوْحِيد : 1-النَّفيِ : ( لَا إلَهَ ) نَفْي الْعُبُودِيَّة 2- الإِثبَاتِ : ( إلَّا اللَّهُ ) مَعبُودَ بِحَقٍّ اللَّه . أَقْسَام تَوْحِيد : 1- تَوحِيدُ الرُّبُوبِيَّةِ : إفرَادِ اللَّهِ بِأَفعَالِه . مِثل: رَزَق . 2- تَوحِيد الأَولَوِهيه : تَوحِيدُ اللَّهِ بِأَفْعَالِ الْعِبَادِ . مِثْلَ: دُعَاء. 3- تَوْحِيدِ الْأَس

19 Aug 2026, 14:17 UTC84 viewsread 23 August 2026

اِنْتَبِهْ! «لَا تَكُنْ مِمَّنْ يَتَّبِعُ الحَقَّ إِذَا وَافَقَ هَوَاهُ، وَيُخَالِفُهُ إِذَا خَالَفَ هَوَاهُ» •شَيْخُ الإِسْلَامِ ابْنُ تَيْمِيَّةَ رَحِمَهُ اللَّهُ.

19 Aug 2026, 11:56 UTC72 viewsread 23 August 2026

«والذنب للعبد كأنه أمر حتم، فالكيس هو الذي لا يزال يأتي من الحسنات بما يمحو السيئات‏». ابن تيمية

18 Aug 2026, 18:56 UTC74 viewsread 23 August 2026
Forwarded from @io90w

الصِّدِّيقِ الَّذِي يُؤلِمُك بِنَصَائِحَهَا خَيرُ مَن صَدِيق فَاسِد يَهوِي إلَيك فِي جَهَنَّمَ خَيْر الرِّفَاقِ مِنْ تَحَابُّوا تَنَاصَحُوا . نَحْنُ بِحَاجَةٍ لِأَصدِقَاء يَنصَحُونَا وَلَيسَ يَمدَحُونَا . يقَولَ عُمَر بن الْخطَاب : لَا خَيْرَ فِي قَوْمٍ لَيْسُوا بِنَاصَحَّيْن، وَلَا خَيْرَ فِي قَوْمٍ لَا يُحِبُّونَ النُّاصْحين . قَال رَسُولٍ ( ﷺ ) : إذَا رَأَيْتُمْ الْمَدَّاحِينَ فَاحْثُوا فِي وُجُوهم التُّرَابُ

18 Aug 2026, 17:07 UTC75 viewsread 23 August 2026

مازال سؤال أبن القيم يحتاج جواب! «أترُيِدُ أن تَدّخلَ الجنَّة ُبعَمَلِ أهلِ النَّار؟»

18 Aug 2026, 17:05 UTC75 viewsread 23 August 2026

﴿ وَلا تَهِنوا وَلا تَحزَنوا وَأَنتُمُ الأَعلَونَ إِن كُنتُم مُؤمِنينَ ﴾

18 Aug 2026, 11:00 UTC81 viewsread 23 August 2026

• " يا أهل السُنة زاَحمُو أهل البدَع همً يرفَعون التَهاني بذكُرى الَمولد النَبوي وأنتـم ارفَعوا أدِلة أن لا أَصل للاحتفِال بهِذه الذكرى وهي " بدعة". . https://t.me/eabaq_2

18 Aug 2026, 10:16 UTC76 viewsread 23 August 2026
Forwarded from @pl22nVoice message

المولد النبوي -ابن باز رحمه الله

17 Aug 2026, 21:35 UTC86 viewsread 23 August 2026

بدأتِ البِدَع، وبدأ التَّغنّي في المساجد احتفالًا بالمولد النبوي، فمتى يُدرِكون أنَّ محبّةَ النبي ﷺ تكون باتِّباع سُنّته والاقتداء به، لا بإحداث ما لم يشرعه الله؟ إنَّ الدِّين أمانة، والعبادات مبناها على الاتِّباع لا الإبتداع، فلا نُحدِث في دين الله ما ليس منه.

16 Aug 2026, 20:50 UTC96 viewsread 23 August 2026

"الحَمْدُ للهِ ربِّ النُّورِ والفلَقِ ومُذهِبِ البَأْسِ والضَّرَّاءِ والقَلَقِ ما بَيْنَ جَنْبَيَّ آياتٌ أُرَدِّدُها تعلُوْ بصاحِبِها كالطَّيرِ في الأفُقِ هبْ أنَّنيْ قد فَقَدْتُ الكونَ أكمَلَهُ فهل خَسِرْتُ وذِكرُ اللهِ في رَمَقِي"

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @aari808. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

إذاعة القرآن الكريم
@BBeBB · 160,888
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 23 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“قُرآنْ ِ﴿وَذَكِّرْ﴾ِ” (@aari808), 784 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aari808.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.